Comparison Overview

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center

VS

The Opportunity Institute

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center

1030 15th St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Championing positive paths forward that nations, economies, and societies can pursue to ensure new technologies and data empower people, prosperity, and peace. #GoodTechChoices

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

The Opportunity Institute

2001 Center St, Berkeley, California, 94704, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

The Opportunity Institute is a nonprofit organization that promotes social mobility and equity by improving outcomes from early childhood through early career. We focus on education, which plays a critical role in opening opportunities, and the related social policies that make true opportunity possible. We bring together leaders in early childhood development, Pre-K through 12 education, juvenile and criminal justice, and higher education to collaborate across policy sectors for broader and deeper impact. Our work reaches around the country, but with special attention to California, our base. We are advancing pragmatic, evidence-based solutions that will combat inequality and build stronger, more equitable ladders to success. Our projects currently include Partners for Each and Every Child, Renewing Communities, Just Equations, and Whole Child Equity.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlantic-council-geotech-center.jpeg
Atlantic Council GeoTech Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-opportunity-institute.jpeg
The Opportunity Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Atlantic Council GeoTech Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Opportunity Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlantic Council GeoTech Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Opportunity Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Atlantic Council GeoTech Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Opportunity Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Opportunity Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlantic-council-geotech-center.jpeg
Atlantic Council GeoTech Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Zero-click attacks
Motivation: Surveillance, Data-stealing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-opportunity-institute.jpeg
The Opportunity Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Opportunity Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atlantic Council GeoTech Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The Opportunity Institute company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Opportunity Institute company and Atlantic Council GeoTech Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Opportunity Institute company nor Atlantic Council GeoTech Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Opportunity Institute company nor Atlantic Council GeoTech Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while The Opportunity Institute company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Atlantic Council GeoTech Center company nor The Opportunity Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atlantic Council GeoTech Center nor The Opportunity Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Atlantic Council GeoTech Center company nor The Opportunity Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center company employs more people globally than The Opportunity Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Atlantic Council GeoTech Center nor The Opportunity Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Atlantic Council GeoTech Center nor The Opportunity Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Atlantic Council GeoTech Center nor The Opportunity Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Atlantic Council GeoTech Center nor The Opportunity Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Atlantic Council GeoTech Center nor The Opportunity Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Atlantic Council GeoTech Center nor The Opportunity Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L