Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Adobe is changing the world through digital experiences. Our creative, marketing and document solutions empower everyone — from emerging artists to global brands — to bring digital creations to life and deliver them to the right person at the right moment for the best results. Our award-winning software and technologies have set the gold standard in communication and collaboration for more than 30 years. Adobe Technical Communication group delivers best-in-class tools, systems, and services that help businesses streamline content workflows end-to-end. With our cutting-edge solutions, teams can effortlessly collaborate on the creation of ground-breaking content, manage and reuse assets efficiently, and seamlessly publish it across multiple channels and devices. Published content can be tailored to audiences, increasing relevance and consumption. All this, and more, while offering the highest return on investment. With the convergence of marketing and technical content across enterprises – Adobe’s new-age solutions will empower organizations to create valuable experiences that build brands, drive demand, and extend the reach and ROI of customer-facing content, pre-sale and post-sale. Adobe’s Technical Communication products include Adobe Experience Manager Guides, Adobe Technical Communication Suite, Adobe FrameMaker, Adobe RoboHelp, Adobe FrameMaker Publishing Server, and Adobe RoboHelp Server.

Adobe Technical Communication A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

AI scoreATC Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adobetcs.jpeg
ATC Software Development
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreATC Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adobetcs.jpeg
ATC Software Development
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

ATC Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
Adobe Technical CommunicationVulnerability8548/2025NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: CISA added CVE-2025-54253, a critical misconfiguration vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms on Java Enterprise Edition (JEE), to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, confirming active in-the-wild exploitation. The flaw stems from an improperly enabled Apache Struts 'devMode' in the admin UI, combined with an authentication bypass, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code remotely via evaluated Struts expressions. Exploitation requires no user interaction and is classified as low-complexity, posing a severe risk to standalone AEM Forms deployments on J2EE-compatible servers like JBoss.Though Adobe patched the vulnerability in August 2025 (alongside CVE-2025-54254, an XXE flaw), a public proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit was released earlier after researchers (Shubham Shah and Adam Kues) disclosed the flaws due to Adobe’s delayed response. The absence of mitigations before the patch led to active exploitation, prompting CISA to mandate Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to apply fixes by November 5, 2025. Organizations failing to upgrade to version 6.5.0-0108 or later remain exposed to full system compromise, data breaches, or lateral movement within corporate networks. The vulnerability’s exploitation could enable attackers to deploy malware, steal sensitive data, or disrupt business operations, particularly in enterprises relying on AEM Forms for critical workflows.

Adobe Technical CommunicationVulnerability10056/2025NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Adobe is facing active exploitation of a critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-54253) in its Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms on JEE (versions 6.5.23 and earlier), allowing unauthenticated attackers to bypass security and execute arbitrary code remotely without user interaction. The flaw, stemming from a misconfiguration in Struts DevMode, was disclosed by researchers on April 28th but left unpatched for over 90 days, during which proof-of-concept exploits became publicly available. While Adobe released fixes on August 9th, the delay exposed organizations to potential large-scale breaches, with CISA mandating federal agencies to patch by November 5th under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01. The vulnerability poses severe risks, including unauthorized system takeover, data exfiltration, or lateral movement within corporate networks. Since AEM is widely used for enterprise content management, exploitation could lead to compromised customer data, financial records, or proprietary business logic, especially if deployed in government, healthcare, or financial sectors. CISA’s warning underscores the urgent threat, as attackers could leverage this flaw for ransomware deployment, espionage, or disruptive cyberattacks. Organizations failing to patch risk regulatory penalties, reputational damage, and operational downtime, particularly if the flaw is chained with other unpatched vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-54254).

Adobe
Vulnerability
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 8/2025
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: CISA added CVE-2025-54253, a critical misconfiguration vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms on Java Enterprise Edition (JEE), to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, confirming active in-the-wild exploitation. The flaw stems from an improperly enabled Apache Struts 'devMode' in the admin UI, combined with an authentication bypass, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code remotely via evaluated Struts expressions. Exploitation requires no user interaction and is classified as low-complexity, posing a severe risk to standalone AEM Forms deployments on J2EE-compatible servers like JBoss.Though Adobe patched the vulnerability in August 2025 (alongside CVE-2025-54254, an XXE flaw), a public proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit was released earlier after researchers (Shubham Shah and Adam Kues) disclosed the flaws due to Adobe’s delayed response. The absence of mitigations before the patch led to active exploitation, prompting CISA to mandate Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to apply fixes by November 5, 2025. Organizations failing to upgrade to version 6.5.0-0108 or later remain exposed to full system compromise, data breaches, or lateral movement within corporate networks. The vulnerability’s exploitation could enable attackers to deploy malware, steal sensitive data, or disrupt business operations, particularly in enterprises relying on AEM Forms for critical workflows.

Adobe
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 6/2025
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Adobe is facing active exploitation of a critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-54253) in its Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms on JEE (versions 6.5.23 and earlier), allowing unauthenticated attackers to bypass security and execute arbitrary code remotely without user interaction. The flaw, stemming from a misconfiguration in Struts DevMode, was disclosed by researchers on April 28th but left unpatched for over 90 days, during which proof-of-concept exploits became publicly available. While Adobe released fixes on August 9th, the delay exposed organizations to potential large-scale breaches, with CISA mandating federal agencies to patch by November 5th under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01. The vulnerability poses severe risks, including unauthorized system takeover, data exfiltration, or lateral movement within corporate networks. Since AEM is widely used for enterprise content management, exploitation could lead to compromised customer data, financial records, or proprietary business logic, especially if deployed in government, healthcare, or financial sectors. CISA’s warning underscores the urgent threat, as attackers could leverage this flaw for ransomware deployment, espionage, or disruptive cyberattacks. Organizations failing to patch risk regulatory penalties, reputational damage, and operational downtime, particularly if the flaw is chained with other unpatched vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-54254).

Ailogo

ATC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for ATC

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adobe Technical Communication in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adobe Technical Communication in 2026.

Incident Types ATC vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adobe Technical Communication in 2026.

Incident History — ATC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ATC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

ATC Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Adobe is changing the world through digital experiences. Our creative, marketing and document solutions empower everyone — from emerging artists to global brands — to bring digital creations to life and deliver them to the right person at the right moment for the best results. Our award-winning software and technologies have set the gold standard in communication and collaboration for more than 30 years. Adobe Technical Communication group delivers best-in-class tools, systems, and services that help businesses streamline content workflows end-to-end. With our cutting-edge solutions, teams can effortlessly collaborate on the creation of ground-breaking content, manage and reuse assets efficiently, and seamlessly publish it across multiple channels and devices. Published content can be tailored to audiences, increasing relevance and consumption. All this, and more, while offering the highest return on investment. With the convergence of marketing and technical content across enterprises – Adobe’s new-age solutions will empower organizations to create valuable experiences that build brands, drive demand, and extend the reach and ROI of customer-facing content, pre-sale and post-sale. Adobe’s Technical Communication products include Adobe Experience Manager Guides, Adobe Technical Communication Suite, Adobe FrameMaker, Adobe RoboHelp, Adobe FrameMaker Publishing Server, and Adobe RoboHelp Server.

Loading...
similarCompanies

ATC Similar Companies

Microsoft

Every company has a mission. What's ours? To empower every person and every organization to achieve more. We believe technology can and should be a force for good and that meaningful innovation contributes to a brighter world in the future and today. Our culture doesn’t just encourage curiosity; it

Facebook

The Facebook company is now Meta. Meta builds technologies that help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving

Airbnb

Airbnb was born in 2007 when two hosts welcomed three guests to their San Francisco home, and has since grown to over 5 million hosts who have welcomed over 2 billion guest arrivals in almost every country across the globe. Every day, hosts offer unique stays, experiences and services that make it p

Shopify

Shopify is a leading global commerce company, providing trusted tools to start, grow, market, and manage a retail business of any size. Shopify makes commerce better for everyone with a platform and services that are engineered for reliability, while delivering a better shopping experience for consu

Zoho offers beautifully smart software to help you grow your business. With over 100 million users worldwide, Zoho's 55+ products aid your sales and marketing, support and collaboration, finance, and recruitment needs—letting you focus only on your business. Zoho respects user privacy and does not h

Groupon is an experiences marketplace that brings people more ways to get the most out of their city or wherever they may be. By enabling real-time mobile commerce across local businesses, live events and travel destinations, Groupon helps people find and discover experiences––big and small, new and

Daraz

Founded in 2015, Daraz is the leading e-commerce platform in South Asia with operations in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Myanmar. It provides sellers and consumers with cutting-edge marketplace technology, targeting a rapidly growing region of over 500 million people. By building an in

Cox Automotive Inc.

Cox Automotive is the world’s largest automotive services and technology provider. Fueled by the largest breadth of first-party data fed by 2.3 billion online interactions a year, Cox Automotive tailors leading solutions for car shoppers, auto manufacturers, dealers, lenders and fleets. The company

SS&C Technologies

SS&C is a leading global provider of mission-critical, cloud-based software and solutions for the financial and healthcare industries. Named to the Fortune 1000 list as a top U.S. company based on revenue, SS&C (NASDAQ: SSNC) is a trusted provider to more than 22,000 financial services and healthcar

newsone

ATC CyberSecurity News

January 14, 2026 05:04 PM
Cyberattacks seek to exploit trust in Microsoft and Adobe tech brands

The first quarter of 2023 has seen a significant increase in cyberattacks looking to exploit trust in established tech brands like Microsoft and Adobe.

December 22, 2025 08:00 AM
A comprehensive list of 2025 tech layoffs

A complete list of all the known layoffs in tech, from Big Tech to startups, broken down by month throughout 2024 and 2025.

July 09, 2025 07:00 AM
Your Data Privacy Is Slipping Away. Here’s Why, And What You Can Do About It

The cybersecurity tools, policies and knowledge to protect personal data exist – but people's and institutions' use of them still falls...

June 16, 2025 07:00 AM
Getting a Job in Tech in San Jose in 2025: The Complete Guide

San Jose's tech job market is booming in 2025, with 15.9% growth in computer and math roles and average salaries reaching $206,000.

May 12, 2025 07:00 AM
Fostering Resilience in Cybersecurity: Prevent Burnout and Enhance Sec Ops

Burnout is a cybersecurity issue; securing SecOps starts with securing cybersecurity professionals' mental health.

April 11, 2025 07:00 AM
6 in-demand tech skills to learn without coding in 2025

Want to thrive in tech without coding? Discover the top 6 in-demand tech skills for 2025, including data analysis, UI/UX, cybersecurity,...

November 26, 2024 08:00 AM
The Next Hot Cybersecurity Skill for Your Resume? Empathy

Adobe's chief security officer tells us why cybersecurity leaders should seek people from diverse career backgrounds.

August 23, 2024 07:00 AM
Cybercriminals Deploy New Malware to Steal Data via Android’s Near Field Communication (NFC)

Malware called NGate allows criminals to steal near field communication data from Android phones. The data is sent to the fraudsters before...

September 05, 2023 07:00 AM
Hackers Exploit Pre-Authentication RCE Vulnerabilities in Adobe ColdFusion

Adobe ColdFusion is a Java-based, commercial web app development platform using CFML for server-side programming.

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

ATC CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Adobe Technical Communication

The official website of Adobe Technical Communication is https://www.adobe.com/products/one-adobe-solution-for-technical-content.html.

Adobe Technical Communication’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Adobe Technical Communication’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 746, reflecting their Moderate security posture.

How many security badges does Adobe Technical Communication’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Adobe Technical Communication currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Adobe Technical Communication been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Adobe Technical Communication has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Adobe Technical Communication have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Adobe Technical Communication is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Adobe Technical Communication have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Adobe Technical Communication does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Adobe Technical Communication comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Adobe Technical Communication is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Adobe Technical Communication have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Adobe Technical Communication does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Adobe Technical Communication comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Adobe Technical Communication is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Adobe Technical Communication have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Adobe Technical Communication is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Adobe Technical Communication

Adobe Technical Communication operates primarily in the Software Development industry.

Number of Employees at Adobe Technical Communication

Adobe Technical Communication employs approximately 62 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Adobe Technical Communication

Adobe Technical Communication presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Adobe Technical Communication’s LinkedIn Followers

Adobe Technical Communication’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 9,946 followers.

NAICS Classification of Adobe Technical Communication

Adobe Technical Communication is classified under the NAICS code 5112, which corresponds to Software Publishers.

Adobe Technical Communication’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Adobe Technical Communication does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Adobe Technical Communication’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Adobe Technical Communication maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/adobetcs.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Adobe Technical Communication

As of January 21, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Adobe Technical Communication has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Adobe Technical Communication has an estimated 28,125 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Adobe Technical Communication ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability.

How does Adobe Technical Communication detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with restrict internet access to standalone aem forms deployments (pre-patch mitigation), and remediation measures with upgrade to aem forms on jee version 6.5.0-0108 or later, and communication strategy with cisa kev catalog update, communication strategy with adobe security advisory, communication strategy with public disclosure of poc exploit by researchers (shubham shah, adam kues), and containment measures with restrict internet access to aem forms when deployed as a standalone application (if patching is delayed), containment measures with discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable, and remediation measures with apply adobe security updates (released 2025-08-09), remediation measures with follow cisa's binding operational directive (bod) 22-01 guidance for federal agencies, and communication strategy with cisa advisory (2025-08-xx, exact date unspecified), communication strategy with adobe security bulletin (2025-08-09), communication strategy with searchlight cyber technical write-up (2025-07-29), and network segmentation with recommended (restrict aem forms exposure), and enhanced monitoring with recommended (for signs of exploitation)..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation

Title: Exploitation of CVE-2025-54253 in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms on JEE

Description: CISA has added CVE-2025-54253, a misconfiguration vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms on Java Enterprise Edition (JEE), to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, warning of detected in-the-wild exploitation. The vulnerability allows remote code execution (RCE) due to an enabled 'devMode' in Apache Struts within the admin UI and an authentication bypass. It affects AEM Forms on JEE versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier. A proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit was publicly released before Adobe's August 2025 patch, increasing the risk of exploitation. CISA has mandated Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to patch their systems by November 5, 2025.

Date Resolved: 2025-08-01

Type: Vulnerability Exploitation

Attack Vector: NetworkLow-Complexity AttackNo User Interaction Required

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-54253 (Misconfiguration in AEM Forms - Apache Struts 'devMode' enabled + Authentication Bypass)CVE-2025-54254 (Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation

Title: Active Exploitation of Critical Adobe Experience Manager Vulnerability (CVE-2025-54253)

Description: CISA has warned that attackers are actively exploiting a maximum-severity vulnerability (CVE-2025-54253) in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms on JEE versions 6.5.23 and earlier. The flaw, an authentication bypass leading to remote code execution (RCE) via Struts DevMode, was disclosed by researchers Adam Kues and Shubham Shah of Searchlight Cyber. Adobe released patches on August 9th after proof-of-concept exploit code became publicly available. CISA has mandated federal agencies to patch by November 5th under BOD 22-01 and urged all organizations to prioritize mitigation.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-07-29

Date Resolved: 2025-08-09

Type: Vulnerability Exploitation

Attack Vector: NetworkMisconfiguration ExploitationStruts DevMode Abuse

Vulnerability Exploited: Cve Id: CVE-2025-54253, Cvss Score: None, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms on JEE 6.5.23 and earlierSeverity: Critical (Maximum), Patch Status: Patched (as of 2025-08-09), Exploit Availability: Proof-of-Concept (Publicly Available).

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Misconfigured Apache Struts 'devMode' in AEM Forms admin UIAuthentication bypass.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Systems Affected: Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms on JEE (versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier)Standalone deployments on J2EE-compatible servers (e.g., JBoss)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Systems Affected: Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms on JEE

Operational Impact: High (Potential for arbitrary code execution on unpatched systems)

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage for organizations failing to patch

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Entity Name: Adobe

Entity Type: Software Vendor

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Entity Name: Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) Agencies

Entity Type: Government

Industry: Public Sector

Location: United States

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Entity Name: Organizations using AEM Forms on JEE (versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier)

Entity Type: Private Sector, Public Sector

Location: Global

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Entity Name: Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) Agencies

Entity Type: Government

Industry: Public Sector

Location: United States

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Entity Name: Private Sector Organizations (using AEM Forms on JEE)

Entity Type: Corporate, Non-Profit, Educational

Location: Global

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Containment Measures: Restrict internet access to standalone AEM Forms deployments (pre-patch mitigation)

Remediation Measures: Upgrade to AEM Forms on JEE version 6.5.0-0108 or later

Communication Strategy: CISA KEV catalog updateAdobe security advisoryPublic disclosure of PoC exploit by researchers (Shubham Shah, Adam Kues)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Containment Measures: Restrict Internet access to AEM Forms when deployed as a standalone application (if patching is delayed)Discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable

Remediation Measures: Apply Adobe security updates (released 2025-08-09)Follow CISA's Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01 guidance for federal agencies

Communication Strategy: CISA advisory (2025-08-XX, exact date unspecified)Adobe security bulletin (2025-08-09)Searchlight Cyber technical write-up (2025-07-29)

Network Segmentation: Recommended (restrict AEM Forms exposure)

Enhanced Monitoring: Recommended (for signs of exploitation)

Data Breach Information

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Upgrade to AEM Forms on JEE version 6.5.0-0108 or later, , Apply Adobe security updates (released 2025-08-09), Follow CISA's Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01 guidance for federal agencies, .

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by restrict internet access to standalone aem forms deployments (pre-patch mitigation), , restrict internet access to aem forms when deployed as a standalone application (if patching is delayed), discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable and .

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Regulatory Notifications: CISA KEV catalog inclusionMandatory patching deadline for FCEB agencies (November 5, 2025)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Regulatory Notifications: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog (added post-disclosure)Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01 (mandates patching for federal agencies by 2025-11-05)

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Lessons Learned: Timely patching is critical to prevent exploitation of publicly disclosed vulnerabilities., Restricting internet exposure of vulnerable systems can mitigate risk pre-patch., Public PoC exploits accelerate attacker adoption of vulnerabilities.

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Lessons Learned: Delayed patching of critical vulnerabilities increases exposure to exploitation., Public disclosure of vulnerabilities without patches can accelerate attacker activity., Restricting network exposure of vulnerable systems can serve as a temporary mitigation.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Recommendations: Upgrade AEM Forms on JEE to version 6.5.0-0108 or later immediately., Audit and restrict internet-facing deployments of AEM Forms, especially standalone instances on J2EE servers., Monitor for signs of exploitation, such as unauthorized code execution or unusual admin UI activity., Follow CISA directives for FCEB agencies and apply patches by the November 5, 2025 deadline., Implement network segmentation to limit lateral movement if exploitation occurs.Upgrade AEM Forms on JEE to version 6.5.0-0108 or later immediately., Audit and restrict internet-facing deployments of AEM Forms, especially standalone instances on J2EE servers., Monitor for signs of exploitation, such as unauthorized code execution or unusual admin UI activity., Follow CISA directives for FCEB agencies and apply patches by the November 5, 2025 deadline., Implement network segmentation to limit lateral movement if exploitation occurs.Upgrade AEM Forms on JEE to version 6.5.0-0108 or later immediately., Audit and restrict internet-facing deployments of AEM Forms, especially standalone instances on J2EE servers., Monitor for signs of exploitation, such as unauthorized code execution or unusual admin UI activity., Follow CISA directives for FCEB agencies and apply patches by the November 5, 2025 deadline., Implement network segmentation to limit lateral movement if exploitation occurs.Upgrade AEM Forms on JEE to version 6.5.0-0108 or later immediately., Audit and restrict internet-facing deployments of AEM Forms, especially standalone instances on J2EE servers., Monitor for signs of exploitation, such as unauthorized code execution or unusual admin UI activity., Follow CISA directives for FCEB agencies and apply patches by the November 5, 2025 deadline., Implement network segmentation to limit lateral movement if exploitation occurs.Upgrade AEM Forms on JEE to version 6.5.0-0108 or later immediately., Audit and restrict internet-facing deployments of AEM Forms, especially standalone instances on J2EE servers., Monitor for signs of exploitation, such as unauthorized code execution or unusual admin UI activity., Follow CISA directives for FCEB agencies and apply patches by the November 5, 2025 deadline., Implement network segmentation to limit lateral movement if exploitation occurs.

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Recommendations: Immediately apply Adobe's security updates for AEM Forms on JEE., Restrict Internet-facing access to AEM Forms if patching is delayed., Monitor systems for signs of exploitation (e.g., unauthorized code execution)., Prioritize patching for vulnerabilities added to CISA's KEV Catalog., Follow CISA's BOD 22-01 guidance for federal systems.Immediately apply Adobe's security updates for AEM Forms on JEE., Restrict Internet-facing access to AEM Forms if patching is delayed., Monitor systems for signs of exploitation (e.g., unauthorized code execution)., Prioritize patching for vulnerabilities added to CISA's KEV Catalog., Follow CISA's BOD 22-01 guidance for federal systems.Immediately apply Adobe's security updates for AEM Forms on JEE., Restrict Internet-facing access to AEM Forms if patching is delayed., Monitor systems for signs of exploitation (e.g., unauthorized code execution)., Prioritize patching for vulnerabilities added to CISA's KEV Catalog., Follow CISA's BOD 22-01 guidance for federal systems.Immediately apply Adobe's security updates for AEM Forms on JEE., Restrict Internet-facing access to AEM Forms if patching is delayed., Monitor systems for signs of exploitation (e.g., unauthorized code execution)., Prioritize patching for vulnerabilities added to CISA's KEV Catalog., Follow CISA's BOD 22-01 guidance for federal systems.Immediately apply Adobe's security updates for AEM Forms on JEE., Restrict Internet-facing access to AEM Forms if patching is delayed., Monitor systems for signs of exploitation (e.g., unauthorized code execution)., Prioritize patching for vulnerabilities added to CISA's KEV Catalog., Follow CISA's BOD 22-01 guidance for federal systems.

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Timely patching is critical to prevent exploitation of publicly disclosed vulnerabilities.,Restricting internet exposure of vulnerable systems can mitigate risk pre-patch.,Public PoC exploits accelerate attacker adoption of vulnerabilities.Delayed patching of critical vulnerabilities increases exposure to exploitation.,Public disclosure of vulnerabilities without patches can accelerate attacker activity.,Restricting network exposure of vulnerable systems can serve as a temporary mitigation.

What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Prioritize patching for vulnerabilities added to CISA's KEV Catalog., Monitor systems for signs of exploitation (e.g., unauthorized code execution)., Immediately apply Adobe's security updates for AEM Forms on JEE., Follow CISA's BOD 22-01 guidance for federal systems. and Restrict Internet-facing access to AEM Forms if patching is delayed..

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Source: Adobe Security Bulletin (August 2025)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Source: Researchers Shubham Shah and Adam Kues (PoC Disclosure)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Source: CISA Advisory on CVE-2025-54253

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Source: Adobe Security Bulletin (APSB25-XX)

Date Accessed: 2025-08-09

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Source: Searchlight Cyber Technical Write-Up

Date Accessed: 2025-07-29

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Source: Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01

URL: https://www.cisa.gov/binding-operational-directive-22-01

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog, and Source: Adobe Security Bulletin (August 2025), and Source: Researchers Shubham Shah and Adam Kues (PoC Disclosure), and Source: CISA Advisory on CVE-2025-54253, and Source: Adobe Security Bulletin (APSB25-XX)Date Accessed: 2025-08-09, and Source: Searchlight Cyber Technical Write-UpDate Accessed: 2025-07-29, and Source: Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01Url: https://www.cisa.gov/binding-operational-directive-22-01.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Investigation Status: Ongoing (limited details available; CISA KEV entry lacks attack specifics)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Investigation Status: Ongoing (active exploitation observed; patching in progress)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Cisa Kev Catalog Update, Adobe Security Advisory, Public Disclosure Of Poc Exploit By Researchers (Shubham Shah, Adam Kues), Cisa Advisory (2025-08-Xx, Exact Date Unspecified), Adobe Security Bulletin (2025-08-09) and Searchlight Cyber Technical Write-Up (2025-07-29).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Stakeholder Advisories: Cisa Patching Directive For Fceb Agencies, Adobe Security Advisory For Customers.

Customer Advisories: Adobe recommends upgrading to patched versions and restricting access to standalone deployments.

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Stakeholder Advisories: Cisa Alert To Federal Agencies And Private Sector Organizations., Adobe Customer Notifications Via Security Bulletin..

Customer Advisories: Adobe recommends immediate patching for AEM Forms on JEE users.CISA urges all organizations to prioritize mitigation.

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Cisa Patching Directive For Fceb Agencies, Adobe Security Advisory For Customers, Adobe Recommends Upgrading To Patched Versions And Restricting Access To Standalone Deployments., , Cisa Alert To Federal Agencies And Private Sector Organizations., Adobe Customer Notifications Via Security Bulletin., Adobe Recommends Immediate Patching For Aem Forms On Jee Users., Cisa Urges All Organizations To Prioritize Mitigation. and .

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Entry Point: Misconfigured Apache Struts 'Devmode' In Aem Forms Admin Ui, Authentication Bypass,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO1392213101625

Root Causes: Misconfiguration In Aem Forms (Apache Struts 'Devmode' Enabled), Lack Of Authentication Enforcement, Delayed Patching Post-Poc Release,

Corrective Actions: Patch Deployment (Aem Forms 6.5.0-0108+), Restrict Internet Exposure Of Vulnerable Systems, Enhanced Monitoring For Rce Attempts,

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation ADO2292522101625

Root Causes: Misconfiguration In Adobe Experience Manager (Aem) Forms On Jee (Authentication Bypass)., Delayed Patching By Adobe (90+ Days Between Disclosure And Fix For Cve-2025-54253)., Public Availability Of Proof-Of-Concept Exploit Code.,

Corrective Actions: Adobe Released Security Updates (2025-08-09)., Cisa Added To Kev Catalog And Issued Patching Mandate For Federal Agencies., Searchlight Cyber Provided Mitigation Guidance (Restrict Network Access).,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Recommended (for signs of exploitation).

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Patch Deployment (Aem Forms 6.5.0-0108+), Restrict Internet Exposure Of Vulnerable Systems, Enhanced Monitoring For Rce Attempts, , Adobe Released Security Updates (2025-08-09)., Cisa Added To Kev Catalog And Issued Patching Mandate For Federal Agencies., Searchlight Cyber Provided Mitigation Guidance (Restrict Network Access)., .

Additional Questions

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-07-29.

What was the most recent incident resolved ?

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on 2025-08-01.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms on JEE (versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier)Standalone deployments on J2EE-compatible servers (e.g., JBoss) and Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms on JEE.

Response to the Incidents

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Restrict internet access to standalone AEM Forms deployments (pre-patch mitigation) and Restrict Internet access to AEM Forms when deployed as a standalone application (if patching is delayed)Discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Restricting network exposure of vulnerable systems can serve as a temporary mitigation.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Upgrade AEM Forms on JEE to version 6.5.0-0108 or later immediately., Prioritize patching for vulnerabilities added to CISA's KEV Catalog., Implement network segmentation to limit lateral movement if exploitation occurs., Monitor for signs of exploitation, such as unauthorized code execution or unusual admin UI activity., Monitor systems for signs of exploitation (e.g., unauthorized code execution)., Follow CISA directives for FCEB agencies and apply patches by the November 5, 2025 deadline., Immediately apply Adobe's security updates for AEM Forms on JEE., Follow CISA's BOD 22-01 guidance for federal systems., Restrict Internet-facing access to AEM Forms if patching is delayed., Audit and restrict internet-facing deployments of AEM Forms and especially standalone instances on J2EE servers..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01, Searchlight Cyber Technical Write-Up, CISA Advisory on CVE-2025-54253, Researchers Shubham Shah and Adam Kues (PoC Disclosure), CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog, Adobe Security Bulletin (APSB25-XX) and Adobe Security Bulletin (August 2025).

What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.cisa.gov/binding-operational-directive-22-01 .

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (limited details available; CISA KEV entry lacks attack specifics).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was CISA patching directive for FCEB agencies, Adobe security advisory for customers, CISA alert to federal agencies and private sector organizations., Adobe customer notifications via security bulletin., .

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Adobe recommends upgrading to patched versions and restricting access to standalone deployments. and Adobe recommends immediate patching for AEM Forms on JEE users.CISA urges all organizations to prioritize mitigation.

Initial Access Broker

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Misconfiguration in AEM Forms (Apache Struts 'devMode' enabled)Lack of authentication enforcementDelayed patching post-PoC release, Misconfiguration in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms on JEE (authentication bypass).Delayed patching by Adobe (90+ days between disclosure and fix for CVE-2025-54253).Public availability of proof-of-concept exploit code..

What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Patch deployment (AEM Forms 6.5.0-0108+)Restrict internet exposure of vulnerable systemsEnhanced monitoring for RCE attempts, Adobe released security updates (2025-08-09).CISA added to KEV Catalog and issued patching mandate for federal agencies.Searchlight Cyber provided mitigation guidance (restrict network access)..

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=adobetcs' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge