Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Zentrale Polizeidirektion NiedersachsenZentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen
VS
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen

Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen

Tannenbergallee 11, Hannover, 30163, DE

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Unser Ziel: Niedersachsen jeden Tag sicherer machen! Gerade bei einer von Teamwork geprägten Organisation sind es die Menschen, die den Erfolg ausmachen – auch bei uns! Wir sind ein wichtiger Teil der Polizei Niedersachsen, allerdings anders, als viele denken. Wir scha...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:155
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

J. Edgar Hoover Building, Washington, 20535-0001, US

Last Update: 28/07/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.fbijobs.gov
100/1000Critical

This is the official Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) LinkedIn account and is used to build awareness of workplace culture, engagement opportunities, and the FBI mission. The FBI does not collect comments or messages through this account. The FBI is the premier ...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:10,425
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
14
Known data breaches
12
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen

Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has 1246.15% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen

Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FBI1785270231
🔒 Incident : Breach
FBIHUN1782843828
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FBIOFF1778905426

FAQ

Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen or Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen or Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Zentrale Polizeidirektion Niedersachsen and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1