Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Yotta Data Services Private Limited » RELYOTNPC1784111693

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (RELYOTNPC1784111693)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-22
Company Score Before Incident760 / 1000
Company Score After Incident738 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERRELYOTNPC1784111693
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORData exfiltration via compromised server
DATA EXPOSED19,000+ sensitive files
INCIDENT DATE28/05/2026
STATUSOngoing (CERT-In, Nuclear Power Corporation of India)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Yotta Data Services Private Limited's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Yotta Data Services Private Limited Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Yotta Data Services Private Limited breach identified under incident ID RELYOTNPC1784111693.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Yotta Data Services Private Limited's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/yotta-data-services, the number of followers: 122129, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 1160 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 760 and after the incident was 738 with a difference of -22 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Yotta Data Services Private Limited and their customers.

On 29 May 2024, Reliance Group disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Ransomware Group Leaks Thousands of Files Linked to India’s Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant".

A ransomware group, World Leaks, has published over 19,000 sensitive files allegedly stolen from Reliance Group, a contractor involved in India’s Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Server hosted by Yotta (Indian data center provider), and exposing 19,000+ sensitive files, with nearly 19,000+ records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Ransomware execution halted (claimed by Yotta), and stakeholders are being briefed through Partial confirmation by Reliance Group; no public comment from Department of Atomic Energy or Prime Minister’s Office.

The case underscores how Ongoing (CERT-In, Nuclear Power Corporation of India), teams are taking away lessons such as Growing cybersecurity risks to critical infrastructure; need for stronger protections across supply chains, particularly in nuclear energy expansion, and recommending next steps like Enhance supply chain security, improve contractor cybersecurity standards, and strengthen monitoring of third-party vendors.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating compromised server hosted by third-party data center provider (Yotta) and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attack threatening the economy of geographical region; server hosted by Yotta. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware execution was halted (claimed by Yotta). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating supply chain vulnerability; third-party contractor access. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 19,000+ sensitive files...engineering blueprints, supplier details and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating inspection records, insurance policies related to nuclear plant. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration via compromised server; files published on dark web and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating files posted on the dark web by World Leaks. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement (T1491) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group published 19,000+ files on dark web and Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware execution halted (potential disruption). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromised server hosted by third-party provider (Yotta) and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware execution halted (suggests evasion attempt). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (70%)
Credential Access
Adversary-in-the-Middle (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Defacement (80%)
Endpoint Denial of Service (50%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (70%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)

Sources & References