Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Wright-Ryan Construction, Inc. » WRI1782147556

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (WRI1782147556)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-60
Company Score Before Incident751 / 1000
Company Score After Incident691 / 1000
Company LinkView Wright-Ryan Construction, Inc. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERWRI1782147556
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personally identifiable information (PII)
INCIDENT DATE17/06/2026
STATUSOngoing (investigated by Shamis & Gentile P.A.)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Wright-Ryan Construction, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Wright-Ryan Construction, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Wright-Ryan Construction, Inc. breach identified under incident ID WRI1782147556.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Wright-Ryan Construction, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/wright-ryan-construction-inc., the number of followers: 2682, the industry type: Construction and the number of employees: 77 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 751 and after the incident was 691 with a difference of -60 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Wright-Ryan Construction, Inc. and their customers.

On 18 June 2026, Wright-Ryan Construction, Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Wright-Ryan Construction Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Personal Information".

Wright-Ryan Construction, Inc.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive personally identifiable information (PII).

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing (investigated by Shamis & Gentile P.A.).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating no details on breach’s cause or scope, but PII accessed implies account compromise and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating prominent firm with potential exposed systems; no attack vector disclosed. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive PII (SSNs, passports) accessed; likely credential abuse and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating driver’s licenses and SSNs compromised; suggests credential harvesting. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, SSNs, driver’s licenses, passport details compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating high-sensitivity PII accessed; likely stored in internal repositories. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach disclosed; PII exposed implies exfiltration occurred and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on exfiltration method; web services a plausible vector. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of destruction, but breach may have involved tampering and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk suggests potential data manipulation. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Credential Access
Modify Authentication Process (50%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References