Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. » WRI1781196310

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (WRI1781196310)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-113
Company Score Before Incident753 / 1000
Company Score After Incident640 / 1000
Company LinkView Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERWRI1781196310
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal data including names and...
INCIDENT DATE02/04/2024
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. breach identified under incident ID WRI1781196310.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/wright-brothers-construction-company-inc-, the number of followers: 19335, the industry type: Construction and the number of employees: 301 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 753 and after the incident was 640 with a difference of -113 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. and their customers.

Wright Brothers Construction Co. recently reported "Wright Brothers Construction Data Breach Settlement", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Wright Brothers Construction Co.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal data including names and Social Security numbers, with nearly 4780 records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of 500000.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification letters to affected individuals.

The case underscores how with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notification letters sent to affected individuals with details on claims and credit monitoring.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including cyberattack on the company’s systems, and alleged failure to implement adequate security measures and External Remote Services (T1133) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating targeted cyberattack on the company’s systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating alleged failure to implement adequate security measures and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names and Social Security numbers compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach exposed the personal data of 4,780 current and former employees. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack in April 2024 that exposed the personal data and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating allegations that the company failed to implement adequate security measures. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
External Remote Services (40%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (60%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References