Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Woolworths at WorkWoolworths at Work
VS
RD SaúdeRD Saúde
Woolworths at Work

Woolworths at Work

407 Elizabeth St, Surry Hills, 2010, AU

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

Woolworths at Work is a whole new business grown to take care of business - from fresh food and kitchen supplies to cleaning and office essentials. Our free business solutions will help save time, drive efficiencies and add real value - from consolidated invoicing to he...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:122
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
RD Saúde

RD Saúde

Avenida Corifeu de Azevedo Marques 3097, São Paulo, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://rdsaude.com.br/
812/1000Good

Somos a RD Saúde, um ecossistema de saúde integral, com mais de 3 mil farmácias em todo o Brasil e negócios em saúde que dividem o mesmo propósito: contribuir para uma sociedade mais saudável. Nossa jornada começou em novembro de 2011, fruto da união entre Droga Raia e ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:34,747
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Woolworths at Work

Woolworths at Work

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
RD Saúde

RD Saúde

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woolworths at Work in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RD Saúde in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Woolworths at Work (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woolworths at Work cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - RD Saúde (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RD Saúde cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Woolworths at Work

Woolworths at Work

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
RD Saúde

RD Saúde

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Woolworths at Work company and RD Saúde company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Woolworths at Work company and RD Saúde company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Woolworths at Work company and RD Saúde company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Woolworths at Work company and RD Saúde company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Woolworths at Work company and RD Saúde company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Woolworths at Work company and RD Saúde company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Woolworths at Work company and RD Saúde company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Woolworths at Work company and RD Saúde company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Woolworths at Work company and RD Saúde company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Woolworths at Work company and RD Saúde company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Woolworths at Work company and RD Saúde company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Woolworths at Work and RD Saúde, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Woolworths at Work and RD Saúde, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Woolworths at Work or RD Saúde ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Woolworths at Work or RD Saúde ?
Between Woolworths at Work and RD Saúde, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Woolworths at Work and RD Saúde, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA