Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Womens Center For Radiology » WOM1782743734

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (WOM1782743734)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-64
Company Score Before Incident765 / 1000
Company Score After Incident701 / 1000
Company LinkView Womens Center For Radiology Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERWOM1782743734
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized Access
DATA EXPOSEDPatient records including names, addresses,...
INCIDENT DATE25/04/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Womens Center For Radiology's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Womens Center For Radiology Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Womens Center For Radiology breach identified under incident ID WOM1782743734.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Womens Center For Radiology's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/womens-center-for-radiology, the number of followers: 53, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 20 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 765 and after the incident was 701 with a difference of -64 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Womens Center For Radiology and their customers.

On 26 June 2026, Women’s Center for Radiology disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Women’s Center for Radiology Data Breach".

The Women’s Center for Radiology, a medical imaging practice in Orlando, Florida, reported a data breach involving unauthorized access to its computer network.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Computer network and sensitive files storage, and exposing Patient records including names, addresses, dates of birth, contact details, medical diagnoses, lab results, physician information, medical record numbers, health insurance details, and driver’s license numbers.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Immediate steps to contain the breach, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure via website notice and dedicated support line.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Dedicated support line (844-507-8933) available Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. EST.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including unauthorized access to its computer network, and gained entry to a portion of the center’s systems and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), with evidence including medical imaging practice in Orlando, Florida, and no specific vulnerability mentioned. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including accessing and downloading sensitive files, and high sensitivity of compromised data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating accessing and downloading sensitive files containing patient information and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating medical diagnoses, lab results, physician information, health insurance details. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including data exfiltration confirmed, and downloading sensitive files and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no specific exfiltration method mentioned. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential identity theft and medical fraud risks for patients. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References