Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Wisner Baum » WIS1769454564

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (WIS1769454564)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-63
Company Score Before Incident751 / 1000
Company Score After Incident688 / 1000
Company LinkView Wisner Baum Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERWIS1769454564
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal information, including names,...
INCIDENT DATE07/10/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Wisner Baum's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Wisner Baum Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Wisner Baum breach identified under incident ID WIS1769454564.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Wisner Baum's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/wisnerbaum, the number of followers: 3717, the industry type: Law Practice and the number of employees: 89 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 751 and after the incident was 688 with a difference of -63 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Wisner Baum and their customers.

On 26 January 2026, Wisner Baum LLP disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Wisner Baum LLP Data Breach Investigation".

Wisner Baum LLP, a Los Angeles-based law firm specializing in litigation against major corporations, experienced a data breach where an unauthorized third party accessed its systems and potentially exfiltrated files containing sensitive personal data, including names, driver’s...

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting IT network, and exposing Sensitive personal information, including names, driver’s license numbers, bank account and routing details, and medical records.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized third party accessed the firm’s systems and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious activity on its IT network. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating accessed the firm’s systems between October 8 and October 9 and Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal data compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating files containing sensitive personal data...potentially exfiltrated and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating names, driver’s license numbers, bank account details, medical records. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating potentially exfiltrating files containing sensitive personal data and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized third party accessed the firm’s systems. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious activity on its IT network and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal data compromised. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Unsecured Credentials (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References