Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Grupa Wirtualna Polska » WIRGOO1781655885

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (WIRGOO1781655885)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-31
Company Score Before Incident766 / 1000
Company Score After Incident735 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERWIRGOO1781655885
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTOREmail
DATA EXPOSEDLogin credentials, Two-factor authentication (2FA)...
INCIDENT DATE28/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Grupa Wirtualna Polska's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Grupa Wirtualna Polska Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Grupa Wirtualna Polska breach identified under incident ID WIRGOO1781655885.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Grupa Wirtualna Polska's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/wirtualna-polska, the number of followers: 17767, the industry type: Technology, Information and Internet and the number of employees: 1135 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 766 and after the incident was 735 with a difference of -31 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Grupa Wirtualna Polska and their customers.

On 01 March 2026, Polish individuals disclosed Phishing issues under the banner "Ghostwriter Hackers Target Gmail Users in Sophisticated Phishing Campaign".

A state-linked hacker group, Ghostwriter (UNC1151), has intensified its phishing attacks against Gmail users, masquerading as official Google security alerts to steal login credentials and two-factor authentication (2FA) codes.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Gmail accounts, Linked social media accounts, and exposing Login credentials, Two-factor authentication (2FA) codes, Sensitive documents, Social media account access.

In response, and began remediation that includes Direct verification via official service URLs, User awareness training, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public advisories from CERT Polska.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Urgent security warnings and sender display names should be treated with skepticism. Direct verification via official service URLs is recommended, and recommending next steps like Enhance user awareness training, implement multi-factor authentication (MFA), monitor for phishing domains, and verify security alerts through official channels, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering CERT Polska has issued public warnings about the phishing campaign.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including phishing attacks against Gmail users, and fake login pages that mimic Gmail’s interface, Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.001) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including emails...directing victims to fake login pages, and phishing domains almost daily, and Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of malicious attachments in description. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Input Capture: Keylogging (T1056.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating capturing passwords and 2FA codes via fake login pages, Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating broad guessing of email addresses, and Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication (T1556.006) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating steal login credentials and two-factor authentication (2FA) codes. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including exfiltrating sensitive documents, and hijacking linked social media accounts and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including sensitive documents compromised, and intelligence-gathering motives. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating phishing pages hosted on compromised Polish websites and Dynamic Resolution (T1568) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating dynamically rotated domains (e.g., *.icu, .digital, .top). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including data exfiltration such as Yes, and sensitive documents compromised. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating compromised Polish websites...without altering the main site and Masquerading (T1036) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including emails impersonate Gmail administrator notices, and sender addresses like [email protected]. Under the Reconnaissance tactic, the analysis identified Active Scanning (T1595) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including broad guessing of email addresses, and targets high-profile Polish individuals. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (95%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (90%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (30%)
Credential Access
Input Capture: Keylogging (80%)
Brute Force (50%)
Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication (90%)
Collection
Data from Local System (70%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol (70%)
Dynamic Resolution (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Defense Evasion
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (60%)
Masquerading (90%)
Reconnaissance
Active Scanning (70%)

Sources & References