Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Winslow Technology Group » WINCALWAS1774953031

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (WINCALWAS1774953031)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-18
Company Score Before Incident751 / 1000
Company Score After Incident733 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERWINCALWAS1774953031
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORExploited weak security controls (absence of MFA)
DATA EXPOSEDAll cloud-stored data permanently deleted
INCIDENT DATE05/09/2023
STATUSOngoing (case in litigation)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Winslow Technology Group's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Winslow Technology Group Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Winslow Technology Group breach identified under incident ID WINCALWAS1774953031.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Winslow Technology Group's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/winslow-technology-group, the number of followers: 3011, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 92 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 751 and after the incident was 733 with a difference of -18 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Winslow Technology Group and their customers.

Calvary Design Team, Inc. recently reported "Calvary Design Team v. Wasabi Technologies, LLC, et al. - Ransomware Data Destruction Case", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A Massachusetts Superior Court judge ruled that the economic loss doctrine does not bar negligence claims in a case involving a 2023 ransomware attack that destroyed a tech company’s critical data.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Cloud storage systems, and exposing All cloud-stored data permanently deleted.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing (case in litigation), teams are taking away lessons such as The economic loss doctrine may not shield IT vendors and cloud providers from negligence claims when ransomware attacks result in permanent data destruction. Businesses and service providers share responsibility for implementing basic security measures like MFA, and recommending next steps like Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) and other basic security controls to mitigate ransomware risks. Review contractual liability limits in light of potential negligence claims, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering IT service providers and cloud vendors may face increased liability for ransomware attacks resulting in data destruction. Businesses should ensure basic security measures are in place to avoid negligence claims.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploited weak security controls, including the absence of multi-factor authentication (MFA) and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating hacker infiltrated Calvary’s systems via cloud storage vulnerabilities. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating absence of MFA enabled exploitation of weak security controls. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating permanent deletion of Calvary’s cloud-stored data; all data destroyed and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating lockBit 3.0 ransomware attack, though data was deleted, not encrypted. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating absence of MFA allowed attacker to bypass security controls. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating lockBit 3.0 ransomware group likely exfiltrated data prior to deletion. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (80%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (90%)
Data Encrypted for Impact (30%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (50%)

Sources & References