Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (WEL1766016089)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Wellcare Medicare's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Wellcare Medicare Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Wellcare Medicare breach identified under incident ID WEL1766016089.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Wellcare Medicare's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/wellcare, the number of followers: 65765, the industry type: Insurance and the number of employees: 5361 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 765 and after the incident was 698 with a difference of -67 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Wellcare Medicare and their customers.
On 07 December 2025, Wellcare Health Plans, Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Wellcare Health Plans Data Breach".
Wellcare Health Plans, Inc.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI), with nearly 325 (Texas only, subject to change) records at risk.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notified affected individuals by mail and through a dedicated website notice.
The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Provided resources such as credit monitoring or identity theft protection (common practice, not confirmed for this incident).
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access mentioned as possible cause of breach and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cause of the breach remains unclear but involves external access. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating pII/PHI exposed suggests possible credential misuse or theft. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data breach exposing PII and PHI implies exfiltration occurred and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no specifics, but cloud storage is a common exfiltration target. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no ransomware confirmed, but encryption is a possible tactic and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating pHI/PII exposure could enable fraud or manipulation. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Wellcare Medicare Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/wellcare/incident/WEL1766016089
- Wellcare Medicare CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/wellcare
- Wellcare Medicare Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/wel1766016089-breach-december-2025/
- Wellcare Medicare CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/wellcare/history
- Wellcare Medicare CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/data-breach/wellcare-health-plans-inc-2025
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf