Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (WEBBAN1787149850)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of WEBA WORLD's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts WEBA WORLD Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the WEBA WORLD breach identified under incident ID WEBBAN1787149850.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of WEBA WORLD's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/weba-world, the number of followers: 374, the industry type: Education Management and the number of employees: 11 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 753 and after the incident was 655 with a difference of -98 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on WEBA WORLD and their customers.
On 10 August 2023, WEBA disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "WEBA Hit by Cyberattack: Customer Data Stolen in Ransomware Incident".
Belgian home furnishings retailer WEBA suffered a cyberattack on August 10, resulting in the theft of customer data and temporary operational disruptions.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting IT systems, and exposing Customer data (names, phone numbers, email and physical addresses, order histories).
In response, and began remediation that includes Restored systems using backups, reinforced security measures, while recovery efforts such as Resumed normal operations continue.
The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Customers remain at potential risk of phishing attempts.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack on August 10, resulting in the theft of customer data and Valid Accounts (T1078) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating attackers accessed personal information via IT systems. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware that partially crippled the company’s IT systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating passwords and online account credentials remained secure (implied access attempt). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating hackers accessed personal information, including names, phone numbers, email... and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating order histories from both in-store and online purchases. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including theft of customer data, and data exfiltration such as Yes. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware that partially crippled the company’s IT systems and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating temporary operational disruptions. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion (T1497) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating attackers failed to encrypt all critical data (implied evasion attempt) and Indicator Removal (T1070) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating restored its systems using backups (implied cleanup). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- WEBA WORLD Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/weba-world/incident/WEBBAN1787149850
- WEBA WORLD CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/weba-world
- WEBA WORLD Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/webban1787149850-weba-bol-ransomware-august-2026/
- WEBA WORLD CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/weba-world/history
- WEBA WORLD CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.retaildetail.eu/news/home/furniture-chain-weba-hit-by-a-cyberattack/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf