What is the official website of We. Communications (UK) ?

The official website of We. Communications (UK) is https://www.wecommunications.com/markets/united-kingdom.

What is We. Communications (UK)'s cybersecurity risk score?

We. Communications (UK) has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 752 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has We. Communications (UK) experienced?

According to Rankiteo, We. Communications (UK) currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has We. Communications (UK) been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, We. Communications (UK) has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does We. Communications (UK) have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, We. Communications (UK) is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does We. Communications (UK) have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, We. Communications (UK) does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does We. Communications (UK) comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, We. Communications (UK) is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does We. Communications (UK) have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, We. Communications (UK) does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does We. Communications (UK) comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, We. Communications (UK) is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does We. Communications (UK) have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,We. Communications (UK) is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does We. Communications (UK) operate in ?

We. Communications (UK) operates primarily in the Public Relations and Communications Services industry.

How many employees does We. Communications (UK) have ?

We. Communications (UK) employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does We. Communications (UK) own any subsidiaries ?

We. Communications (UK) presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does We. Communications (UK) have ?

We. Communications (UK)'s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 1,308 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for We. Communications (UK) ?

We. Communications (UK) is classified under the NAICS code 54182, which corresponds to Public Relations Agencies.

Does We. Communications (UK) have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, We. Communications (UK) does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does We. Communications (UK) have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, We. Communications (UK) maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/we-communications-uk.

How many cybersecurity incidents has We. Communications (UK) experienced ?

As of July 2, 2026, Rankiteo reports that We. Communications (UK) has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does We. Communications (UK) have ?

We. Communications (UK) has an estimated 4,610 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

752

/1000

Fair

777

/1000

Fair

We. Communications (UK) Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

wecommunications.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

We. is a global communications agency helping brands navigate an ever-changing world. We’ve spent decades at the intersection of technology and humanity, translating new innovations into meaningful experiences that connect with people. As change accelerates and expectations evolve, we use our expertise to help brands communicate through complexity to drive connection, understanding and progress. We offer a range of solutions with this in mind, across diverse industries, audiences and stakeholders.

WC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

We. Communications (UK) CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

WC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for WC

Incidents vs Public Relations and Communications Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for We. Communications (UK) in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for We. Communications (UK) in 2026.

Incident Types WC vs Public Relations and Communications Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for We. Communications (UK) in 2026.

Incident History - WC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

We. Communications (UK) Subsidiaries

WC

Public Relations and Communications Services

Website: https://www.wecommunications.com/markets/united-kingdom

Company Size: 501-1,000 employees

WE CommunicationsPublic Relations and Communications Services

Avian We.Public Relations and Communications Services

CodewordAdvertising Services

WE Red BridgePublic Relations and Communications Services

We. Communications DeutschlandPublic Relations and Communications Services

Loading…

We. Communications (UK) Similar Companies

International Mission of Mercy (IMM)

immusa.org

International Mission of Mercy (IMM) was founded in 1991 by Satish Mehtani, a veteran of disaster relief missions in Kuwait, Japan and at the World Trade Center following September 11, 2001. IMM is a certified 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization whose goals are to serve people of all cultures following natural or man-made disasters, including weather-related catastrophes and violent uprisings. Mr. Mehtani and his wife Sneh are honored and proud to live in freedom in the United States. To pay tribute to their good luck, they have pledged a portion of their resources from Mehtani Restaurant Group, a 30-year-old, national portfolio of seven fine-dining Indian, Pan-Asian and Italian restaurants, and an award-winning catered events business, to rebuild communities and care for affected populations around the world. The professional team committed to IMM includes renowned physicians in the fields of pediatrics, geriatrics, orthopedics, infectious disease, ophthalmology, pain management, obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, psychology, physical therapy, nuclear medicine and more. Also on the distinguished Board of Directors is a former U.S. Ambassador, a retired Major General USA, attorneys, the Manhattan Chamber of Commerce CEO and respected leaders in the community. IMM provides satellite feeding centers capable of serving up to 10,000 people per day, using foods and designing recipes common to the culture of the region.

Loading…

NEWS

We. Communications (UK) CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

January 09, 2026 08:00 AM

UK's £210m Cybersecurity Push Advances, But Silence on Encryption Raises Alarms

The United Kingdom is investing £210m to secure public services, but the lack of guidance on encrypted communications is raising fears that...

Read Article

December 03, 2025 08:00 AM

Spy in the sky promises to render cyber attacks impossible

An out of this world Oxford-Singapore SpaceTech collaboration is testing whether ultra-secure quantum communication technology from orbit...

Read Article

November 25, 2025 08:00 AM

Sale of Cyberseer Limited to Redsquid Communications

Cyberseer is a UK-based Managed Security Service Provider that specialises in Managed Detection and Response, protecting organisations 24/7...

Read Article

November 20, 2025 08:00 AM

FCC eliminates cybersecurity requirements for telecom companies

The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday abandoned an effort to require telecommunications companies to meet minimum cybersecurity...

Read Article

October 16, 2025 07:00 AM

Thousands of LNER train passengers are latest hacking victims

The train operator, whose services run from London to Edinburgh , revealed that hackers gained access to its customer communication database...

Read Article

October 15, 2025 07:00 AM

UK Home Office Selects Leonardo MC_linX Dispatcher for Their Blue Light Services

The MC_linX Dispatcher will support users to transition from the Airwave Network to the Emergency Services Network, by providing a...

Read Article

September 11, 2025 07:00 AM

Insider threat of students leading to increasing number of cyber attacks in schools

Over half of school insider cyber attacks caused by students; Almost a third of insider attack incidents caused by students guessing weak...

Read Article

August 29, 2025 07:00 AM

National Security Strategy 2025: Security for the British People in a Dangerous World (HTML)

CP 1338. PM Foreword. National Security is the first responsibility of any government, that never changes. But as the world changes,...

Read Article

August 27, 2025 07:00 AM

UK and allies expose China-based technology companies for enabling global cyber campaign against critical networks

GCHQ's National Cyber Security Centre and international partners link three China-based companies to campaign targeting foreign governments...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-55790

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.22 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.15, an attacker with only a GitHub account can plant a JavaScript payload in a craftcms/cms issue title. When a Craft admin uses the CraftSupport widget’s "Give feedback" screen and types a search term that returns the poisoned issue, the payload executes in the admin’s control panel session. No control panel account or elevated privileges are required on the attacker’s side. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.16 and 5.9.23.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-50284

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.21 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.14, theAssetsController::actionDeleteFolder() only requires the deleteAssets:<volume-uid> permission for the target folder. It never enforces deletePeerAssets:<volume-uid>, even though Assets::deleteFoldersByIds() cascades deletion to every descendant folder and every asset inside, regardless of the uploader's assigned privileges. A low-privilege user who has been granted folder-management rights on a shared volume can therefore destroy assets uploaded by other users (peer assets), bypassing the per-asset peer-permission check that the sibling actionDeleteAsset endpoint correctly applies. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.15 and 5.9.22.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-50283

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). Versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.20, and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.13 contain an authorization issue in the AssetsController::actionReplaceFile that can delete a source asset without source delete permission by supplying both assetId and sourceAssetId. AssetsController::actionReplaceFile() supports replacing a target asset file using another existing asset as the source. The action loads: assetId -> $assetToReplace and sourceAssetId -> $sourceAsset, then enforces replace permissions using ($assetToReplace ?: $sourceAsset). When both IDs are provided, this expression resolves to the target asset so no permission check is performed against the source asset volume. When both assets are present, Craft copies the source file into the target and then deletes the source asset. There is no deletion check for for the source asset. An authenticated user who can replace files in one volume can delete assets in another volume where they do not have delete permission, as long as they can obtain a sourceAssetId, leading to broken content references and data loss. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.14 and 5.9.21.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-14440

SUMMARY

Description: To issue and renew TLS certificates on behalf of customers, Cloudflare's Universal SSL feature automatically manages the CAA RRset for the customer's zone. This auto-managed RRset is permissive by design (e.g. 'issue "letsencrypt.org"' without parameters). On Universal SSL zones, Cloudflare's authoritative DNS serves this auto-managed RRset at query time, superseding any customer-configured CAA records on the zone. When a customer publishes a stricter CAA record using the RFC 8657 accounturi or validationmethods parameters, the Certificate Authority does not observe those parameters when evaluating the served RRset under RFC 8659. As a result, the RFC 8657 account-binding and validation-method-binding protections are not enforced end-to-end on Universal SSL zones. Successful exploitation could result in issuance of a browser-trusted TLS certificate to an attacker, enabling MITM against the affected domain. Exploitation is non-trivial in practice: an attacker would need to hold an ACME account at one of the Certificate Authorities in the served CAA RRset and to simultaneously satisfy domain control validation across the multiple geographically distinct Network Perspectives the CA relies on for Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration. Cloudflare prefixes are anycast-announced from hundreds of locations globally, raising the bar against single-vantage-point BGP hijacks. Any resulting misissuance of a browser-trusted certificate is subject to Certificate Transparency logging required by major browsers, and would be visible to CT monitoring. Mitigation: Customers requiring strict RFC 8657 enforcement need to disable Universal SSL on the affected zone. Universal SSL's automatic CAA management and customer-set RFC 8657 accounturi and validationmethods enforcement are mutually exclusive by the nature of the issue, so there is no in-product workaround that preserves both. Certificate Transparency monitoring is recommended for all customers as a general detection control. Credits: David Osipov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2713-9242), independent researcher

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.6

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-14422

SUMMARY

Out of bounds read and write in Tint in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…