Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » W.C. Smith Wholesale Distributor Inc. » WCS1768336289

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (WCS1768336289)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-56
Company Score Before Incident748 / 1000
Company Score After Incident692 / 1000
Company LinkView W.C. Smith Wholesale Distributor Inc. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERWCS1768336289
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personally identifiable information
INCIDENT DATE17/05/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of W.C. Smith Wholesale Distributor Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts W.C. Smith Wholesale Distributor Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the W.C. Smith Wholesale Distributor Inc. breach identified under incident ID WCS1768336289.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of W.C. Smith Wholesale Distributor Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/wcsmith, the number of followers: 438, the industry type: Wholesale and the number of employees: 23 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 748 and after the incident was 692 with a difference of -56 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on W.C. Smith Wholesale Distributor Inc. and their customers.

On 12 January 2026, William C. Smith and Company disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "William C. Smith and Company Data Breach".

Shamis & Gentile P.A.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Certain computer network systems, and exposing Sensitive personally identifiable information.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Isolated affected systems, and stakeholders are being briefed through Written notices sent to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing, and recommending next steps like Review account statements and credit reports regularly for unauthorized activity, Place a fraud alert or credit freeze on your credit file with major credit bureaus and Report suspected identity theft or fraud to banks, credit card companies, and law enforcement, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Written notices sent to affected individuals on Jan. 12, 2026.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor accessed and exfiltrated files and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious activity on its network. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating accessed and exfiltrated files containing PII. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating files containing personally identifiable information (PII). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor accessed and exfiltrated files and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious activity on its network and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating heightening risks of identity theft and fraud. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References