Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Waitrose & PartnersWaitrose & Partners
VS
NAPA Auto PartsNAPA Auto Parts
Waitrose & Partners

Waitrose & Partners

Waite House, Doncastle Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, GB, RG12 8YA

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
773/1000Fair

We’re on a journey, an ongoing experiment to find happier, more trusted ways of doing business and all of our Partners have a part to play. By joining the Partnership you’ll be joining a different kind of business. One that seeks to make a difference, not just to its ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:18,187
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
NAPA Auto Parts

NAPA Auto Parts

2999 Wildwood Pkwy, Atlanta, Georgia, US, 30339

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://jobs.genpt.com
790/1000Fair

Through nearly 6,000 auto parts stores and over 16,000 auto care and collision centers in the U.S., NAPA has America’s largest network of parts and care. The NAPA Network is supported by nationwide distribution centers with approximately 800,000 available parts, accesso...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,772
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Waitrose & Partners

Waitrose & Partners

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NAPA Auto Parts

NAPA Auto Parts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Waitrose & Partners in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NAPA Auto Parts in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Waitrose & Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Waitrose & Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NAPA Auto Parts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAPA Auto Parts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Waitrose & Partners

Waitrose & Partners

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MARCALWAISAITOYTHEMORPET-TE1772023906
NAPA Auto Parts

NAPA Auto Parts

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Waitrose & Partners company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Waitrose & Partners company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Waitrose & Partners company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Waitrose & Partners company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Waitrose & Partners company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Waitrose & Partners company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Waitrose & Partners company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Waitrose & Partners company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Waitrose & Partners company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Waitrose & Partners company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Waitrose & Partners company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Waitrose & Partners and NAPA Auto Parts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Waitrose & Partners and NAPA Auto Parts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Waitrose & Partners or NAPA Auto Parts ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Waitrose & Partners or NAPA Auto Parts ?
Between Waitrose & Partners and NAPA Auto Parts, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Waitrose & Partners and NAPA Auto Parts, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8