Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VITAS HealthcareVITAS Healthcare
VS
DaVita Kidney CareDaVita Kidney Care
VITAS Healthcare

VITAS Healthcare

3046 Corporate Way, Miramar, 33025, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
https://www.vitas.com
574/1000Very Poor

The nation’s leading provider of end-of-life care, and we have the resources and expertise to support your personal and professional growth. With nearly 12,000 employees, VITAS was named a 2025 Top Workplace in Healthcare. We are committed to providing compassionate ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:6,906
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1
DaVita Kidney Care

DaVita Kidney Care

2000 16th Street, Denver, 80202, US

Last Update: 24/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.davita.com
100/1000Critical

DaVita means “to give life,” reflecting our proud history as leaders in dialysis—an essential, life-sustaining treatment for those living with end stage kidney disease (ESKD). Today, our mission is to minimize the devastating impacts of kidney disease across the full sp...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:38,795
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
VITAS Healthcare

VITAS Healthcare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DaVita Kidney Care

DaVita Kidney Care

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VITAS Healthcare in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

DaVita Kidney Care has 90.48% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - VITAS Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VITAS Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DaVita Kidney Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DaVita Kidney Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
VITAS Healthcare

VITAS Healthcare

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VIT1764820973
🔒 Incident : Breach
VIT1765275172
🔒 Incident : Breach
VIT0093100112025
DaVita Kidney Care

DaVita Kidney Care

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TEXDAV1773347117
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CONDAVORASANASA1770645741
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
KET5232452102025

FAQ

Between VITAS Healthcare company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between VITAS Healthcare company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between VITAS Healthcare company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between VITAS Healthcare company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between VITAS Healthcare company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between VITAS Healthcare company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between VITAS Healthcare company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between VITAS Healthcare company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between VITAS Healthcare company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between VITAS Healthcare company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between VITAS Healthcare company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between VITAS Healthcare and DaVita Kidney Care, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between VITAS Healthcare and DaVita Kidney Care, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - VITAS Healthcare or DaVita Kidney Care ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - VITAS Healthcare or DaVita Kidney Care ?
Between VITAS Healthcare and DaVita Kidney Care, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between VITAS Healthcare and DaVita Kidney Care, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2