DKC
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
davita
Website:
Employees number:
37,883
Number of followers:
309,507
NAICS:
62
Industry Type:
Homepage:
davita.com
IP Addresses:
406
Company ID:
DAV_2074719
Scan Status:
Completed
DaVita Kidney Care Company CyberSecurity Posture
davita.com
DaVita means “to give life,” reflecting our proud history as leaders in dialysis—an essential, life-sustaining treatment for those living with end stage kidney disease (ESKD). Today, our mission is to minimize the devastating impacts of kidney disease across the full spectrum of kidney health care. At DaVita, we’re a community first and a company second. We care for our teammates with the same intensity with which we care for our patients—and encourage our teammates to bring their hearts to work. That is, we can be the same people inside and outside of work because for us, it’s not work, it’s our passion. Interested in joining our Village? There are over 75,000 careers and counting. Visit careers.davita.com to start your career adventure.
DaVita Kidney Care A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
DKC Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 0 and 549
DKC
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
DKC Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
DKC
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
DKC Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
7
Attack Types
2
DaVita Inc.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences
Description: On **June 17, 2024**, DaVita Inc. suffered a **data breach** involving unauthorized transmission of personal information via **online tracking technologies** to third-party vendors. The exposed data included **IP addresses, usernames, and demographic details**, but **no highly sensitive information** such as Social Security numbers, financial account details, or medical records was compromised. The incident was disclosed by the **California Office of the Attorney General** on **July 3, 2024**. The breach primarily affected **non-critical personal data**, meaning the impact was limited to **potential privacy concerns** rather than financial fraud or identity theft. While the exposure of IP addresses and usernames could lead to **targeted phishing attempts** or **reputational harm**, there was no evidence of malicious exploitation of the leaked data. The company likely faced **regulatory scrutiny** under data protection laws (e.g., CCPA) but avoided severe operational or financial disruptions. No ransomware, direct cyberattack, or systemic vulnerability exploitation was reported in this case.
DaVita Kidney Care
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: DaVita Inc. experienced a data breach after an unauthorized party accessed sensitive consumer data entrusted to the company. The breach compromised the names, addresses, Social Security numbers, medical information and health insurance information of certain individuals including 1,072 Texas residents.
DaVita
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: DaVita, a Fortune 500 company specializing in kidney care, experienced a significant data breach resulting in the theft and leak of 1.5 terabytes of data from their systems. The attack was carried out by the Interlock ransomware group, which has been actively targeting businesses and critical infrastructure organizations with double extortion attacks. The stolen data included sensitive information, impacting the company's operations and potentially compromising patient data.
DaVita Healthcare
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Interlock ransomware group targeted DaVita Healthcare, a major healthcare provider specializing in kidney dialysis treatment. In April 2025, the group stole a staggering 20 terabytes (TB) of sensitive patient data. This attack highlights a significant shift in targets for the Interlock ransomware group, which is known for its double-extortion tactics. The theft of such a large amount of sensitive data raises concerns about the security of healthcare information and the potential for further attacks on critical sectors.
DaVita
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack that could injure or kill people
Description: DaVita, a major U.S. dialysis service provider operating nearly 3,000 outpatient clinics and serving ~200,000 patients annually, suffered a **ransomware attack** that encrypted parts of its IT network. The incident, discovered on **Saturday**, caused **operational disruptions**, forcing the company to isolate affected systems while continuing patient care. DaVita could not estimate the **duration or full extent** of the disruption, which impacted its ability to restore critical functions. The attack follows a broader trend of cyber threats in healthcare, including a 2023 breach at rival **Fresenius Medical Care** (500,000 patient records stolen) and a 2023 ransomware attack on **UnitedHealth Group’s tech unit** (100 million records exposed). DaVita engaged third-party cybersecurity experts and notified law enforcement. Given its role in life-sustaining dialysis services, the attack poses risks to **patient safety** and **operational continuity**, with potential cascading effects on healthcare delivery.
DaVita
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: DaVita, a leading US-based kidney dialysis provider, suffered a severe ransomware attack in **March 2025**, orchestrated by the **Interlock** gang. The breach compromised **2,689,826 patient records**, with hackers allegedly exfiltrating **1.51 TB of sensitive data**, including medical histories, treatment details, and personally identifiable information (PII). The attack disrupted critical healthcare operations, raising concerns over patient safety and data privacy compliance (e.g., HIPAA violations). While DaVita did not confirm whether a ransom was paid, the incident underscored vulnerabilities in third-party vendor integrations and legacy system protections. The breach’s scale—ranked among the **top 5 largest healthcare ransomware attacks of Q1-Q3 2025**—highlighted the escalating targeting of healthcare providers by cybercriminals exploiting high-value patient data for extortion. The prolonged recovery period further strained resources, with potential long-term reputational damage and regulatory penalties looming.
DaVita
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack that could injure or kill people
Description: DaVita, a US-based kidney dialysis firm operating over 2,600 treatment centers across 12 countries, suffered a ransomware attack on April 12, 2025. The attack encrypted critical systems, disrupting operations and forcing the company to isolate affected networks. While DaVita activated response protocols and restored some functions via contingency plans to maintain patient care, the full scope of the breach—including potential data exfiltration—remains unknown. The incident impacted core operations, with no estimated timeline for full recovery. No ransomware group has claimed responsibility, and the attacker’s identity is still under investigation. Given the nature of the attack and the company’s role in life-sustaining medical services, the disruption poses significant risks to patient treatment continuity, though no direct harm to individuals has been confirmed yet. The company is collaborating with cybersecurity experts and law enforcement to assess and mitigate the damage.
DKC Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for DKC
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)
DaVita Kidney Care has 257.14% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
DaVita Kidney Care has 284.62% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types DKC vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
DaVita Kidney Care reported 3 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 3 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — DKC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DKC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
DKC Company Subsidiaries
DaVita means “to give life,” reflecting our proud history as leaders in dialysis—an essential, life-sustaining treatment for those living with end stage kidney disease (ESKD). Today, our mission is to minimize the devastating impacts of kidney disease across the full spectrum of kidney health care. At DaVita, we’re a community first and a company second. We care for our teammates with the same intensity with which we care for our patients—and encourage our teammates to bring their hearts to work. That is, we can be the same people inside and outside of work because for us, it’s not work, it’s our passion. Interested in joining our Village? There are over 75,000 careers and counting. Visit careers.davita.com to start your career adventure.
Loading...
DKC Similar Companies
Molina Healthcare
Molina Healthcare is a FORTUNE 500 company that is focused exclusively on government-sponsored health care programs for families and individuals who qualify for government sponsored health care. Molina Healthcare contracts with state governments and serves as a health plan providing a wide range o
ELSAN
ELSAN, groupe leader de l’hospitalisation privée en France, compte aujourd’hui plus de 28 000 collaborateurs et 7500 médecins libéraux qui exercent dans les 212 établissements et centres du groupe. Ils prennent en charge plus de 4,8 millions de patients par an. Notre mission : offrir à chac
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Nationwide Children’s is one of America's largest pediatric hospitals, an international leader in research and is ranked in all 10 specialties on U.S. News & World Report’s 2025-26 “America’s Best Children’s Hospitals” list. Our staff, comprised of 1,600 medical professionals and over 16,000 employe
Siemens Healthineers
Siemens Healthineers is a leading medtech company with over 125 years of experience. We pioneer breakthroughs in healthcare. For everyone. Everywhere. Sustainably. Our portfolio, spanning in vitro and in vivo diagnostics to image-guided therapy and cancer care, is crucial for clinical decision-makin
Lifespan
Formed in 1994, Brown University Health (Formerly Lifespan) is a not-for-profit health system based in Providence, RI comprising three teaching hospitals of The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University: Rhode Island Hospital and its Hasbro Children's; The Miriam Hospital; and Bradley Hospita
Bupa
Bupa's purpose is helping people live longer, healthier, happier lives and making a better world. We are an international healthcare company serving over 38 million customers worldwide. With no shareholders, we reinvest profits into providing more and better healthcare for the benefit of current an
Oregon Health & Science University
At OHSU, we deliver breakthroughs for better health. We're driven by the belief that better health starts with innovations in the lab, in the classroom, at the bedside and in our communities. From cancer to Alzheimer's to cardiovascular care, we collaborate every day to identify and deliver new wa
Hospital Sisters Health System
Since 1875, the Hospital Sisters of St. Francis have been caring for patients in Illinois, Wisconsin and other locations in the United States and across the world. Today, Hospital Sisters Health System (HSHS) is a multi-institutional health care system that cares for patients in 14 communities in Il
St. Luke's Health System
As the only Idaho-based, not-for-profit health system, St. Luke’s Health System is dedicated to our mission “To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.” Today that means not only treating you when you’re sick or hurt, but doing everything we can to help you be as healthy as possibl
.png)
DKC CyberSecurity News
October 30, 2025 02:17 AM
DaVita’s Profit Misses Mark As Costs And Volume Drop Bite
The kidney care giant struggled with higher expenses, fewer treatments, and lingering effects from a cybersecurity breach—pushing profits below Wall...
October 29, 2025 07:00 AM
DAVITA INC. SEC 10-Q Report
DaVita Inc., a leading provider of kidney care services in the United States, has released its Form 10-Q report for the third quarter of...
September 04, 2025 07:00 AM
Hackers inside hospital network for two months expose 140K people
Aspire Rural Health System, a three-hospital system in Michigan, said it was unaware that its network had been compromised.
August 25, 2025 07:00 AM
DaVita Confirms Data Breach Impacting 2.4 Million Patients
Healthcare giant DaVita is grappling with fallout of ransomware attack tied to infamous Interlock cybercrime group.
August 24, 2025 07:00 AM
Ransomware Attack Hits Dialysis Firm DaVita, 2.7 Million Patients’ Data Potentially Exposed
A ransomware attack reportedly hit the network of dialysis provider DaVita, impacting nearly 2.7 million people(around 27 lakh people),...
August 23, 2025 07:00 AM
Kidney dialysis firm DaVita confirms ransomware attack compromised data of 2.7M people
Kidney dialysis firm DaVita confirms ransomware breach exposed personal and health data of nearly 2.7M individuals.
August 22, 2025 07:00 AM
Ransomware attack on DaVita kidney care clinics exposes 2.7M patients
After reporting in April that it was the victim of a cyberattack, a nationwide chain of kidney care and dialysis clinics has confirmed the...
August 22, 2025 07:00 AM
Ransomware attack on DaVita exposes data from 2.7M
Data from 2.7 million people were exposed after a ransomware attack on kidney care provider DaVita this spring, according to a report to...
August 22, 2025 07:00 AM
Kidney dialysis giant DaVita tells 2.4M people they were snared in ransomware data theft nightmare
Ransomware scum breached kidney dialysis firm Davita's labs database in April and stole about 2.4 million people's personal and...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
DKC CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of DaVita Kidney Care
The official website of DaVita Kidney Care is https://careers.davita.com.
DaVita Kidney Care’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, DaVita Kidney Care’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 155, reflecting their Critical security posture.
How many security badges does DaVita Kidney Care’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, DaVita Kidney Care currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does DaVita Kidney Care have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, DaVita Kidney Care is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does DaVita Kidney Care have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, DaVita Kidney Care does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does DaVita Kidney Care comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, DaVita Kidney Care is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does DaVita Kidney Care have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, DaVita Kidney Care does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does DaVita Kidney Care comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, DaVita Kidney Care is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does DaVita Kidney Care have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,DaVita Kidney Care is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of DaVita Kidney Care
DaVita Kidney Care operates primarily in the Hospitals and Health Care industry.
Number of Employees at DaVita Kidney Care
DaVita Kidney Care employs approximately 37,883 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by DaVita Kidney Care
DaVita Kidney Care presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
DaVita Kidney Care’s LinkedIn Followers
DaVita Kidney Care’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 309,507 followers.
NAICS Classification of DaVita Kidney Care
DaVita Kidney Care is classified under the NAICS code 62, which corresponds to Health Care and Social Assistance.
DaVita Kidney Care’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, DaVita Kidney Care has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/renal-treatment-centers.
DaVita Kidney Care’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, DaVita Kidney Care maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/davita.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving DaVita Kidney Care
As of December 21, 2025, Rankiteo reports that DaVita Kidney Care has experienced 7 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
DaVita Kidney Care has an estimated 31,363 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at DaVita Kidney Care ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach and Ransomware.
How does DaVita Kidney Care detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with dns filtering, containment measures with web access firewalls, containment measures with network segmentation, and remediation measures with train users to recognize social engineering attempts, remediation measures with keep systems, software, and firmware up to date, remediation measures with establish icam policies, remediation measures with require mfa for all services, and and and third party assistance with cybersecurity professionals, and and containment measures with separating impacted systems from the network, and recovery measures with restoring certain functions, and communication strategy with regulatory filing, and communication strategy with public disclosure via california office of the attorney general, and and and and containment measures with isolation of impacted systems, and recovery measures with implementation of contingency plans to restore certain functions, and communication strategy with sec form 8-k filing, communication strategy with public disclosure, and incident response plan activated with yes (for confirmed attacks, e.g., clinical diagnostics, hcrg care group), and third party assistance with cybersecurity firms (unspecified), third party assistance with legal teams (e.g., hcrg care group issued injunction against medusa), and law enforcement notified with yes (e.g., clinical diagnostics involved police; general practice in regulated regions), and containment measures with system isolation (e.g., simonmed interrupted hackers), containment measures with backup restoration (assumed for providers with backups), containment measures with network segmentation (likely for some entities), and remediation measures with patch management (e.g., healthcare providers updating systems post-2024 attacks), remediation measures with employee training (e.g., cybersecurity awareness programs), remediation measures with data breach notifications (e.g., episource, davita, frederick health), and recovery measures with technical outage recovery (e.g., cookeville regional medical center), recovery measures with data restoration from backups (where available), recovery measures with public communications (e.g., breach notifications, press releases), and communication strategy with delayed public disclosure (avg. 3.7 months in the us), communication strategy with direct notifications to affected individuals (e.g., episource, davita), communication strategy with regulatory filings (e.g., hhs ocr in the us), and network segmentation with likely implemented post-breach for some entities, and enhanced monitoring with assumed for high-risk entities (e.g., ransomware targets)..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: DaVita Inc. Data Breach
Description: DaVita Inc. experienced a data breach after an unauthorized party accessed sensitive consumer data entrusted to the company.
Type: Data Breach
Threat Actor: Unauthorized Party
Title: Interlock Ransomware Group Targets Universities with NodeSnake RAT
Description: Quorum Cyber discovered two new versions of NodeSnake RAT linked to the Interlock ransomware group, indicating a shift in targets to universities and local government bodies.
Type: Malware (RAT)
Attack Vector: Remote Access Trojan (RAT)
Threat Actor: Interlock ransomware group
Motivation: EspionageDouble-extortion
Title: Increased Interlock Ransomware Activity
Description: CISA and the FBI warned of increased Interlock ransomware activity targeting businesses and critical infrastructure organizations in double extortion attacks. The advisory provides network defenders with indicators of compromise (IOCs) and mitigation measures.
Date Detected: September 2024
Date Publicly Disclosed: June 2025
Type: Ransomware
Attack Vector: Drive-by download from compromised legitimate websitesFileFix technique
Threat Actor: Interlock ransomware group
Motivation: Financial gain through double extortion
Title: Ransomware Attack on DaVita Disrupts Operations
Description: DaVita, a major dialysis service provider, was hit by a ransomware attack that encrypted parts of its network, causing operational disruptions. The company continues to provide patient care while assessing the incident with third-party cybersecurity professionals and law enforcement. The extent and duration of the disruption remain unclear.
Date Detected: 2024-05-11
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-05-13
Type: ransomware
Title: DaVita Inc. Data Breach via Online Tracking Technologies
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported that DaVita Inc. experienced a data breach on June 17, 2024, involving certain online tracking technologies that may have transmitted personal information to third-party vendors. The breach involved information such as IP addresses, usernames, and certain demographic data, but not sensitive information like Social Security numbers or financial account details.
Date Detected: 2024-06-17
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-07-03
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Online Tracking Technologies (Third-Party Data Transmission)
Title: Ransomware Attack on DaVita
Description: US-based kidney dialysis firm DaVita suffered a ransomware attack over the weekend (April 12, 2025), encrypting several systems connected to its network and impacting operations. The company operates over 2,600 treatment centers in 12 countries. DaVita activated response protocols, isolated impacted systems, and implemented contingency plans to restore certain functions and continue patient care. The attacker's identity, scope of data exfiltration (if any), and full impact remain unknown. Law enforcement was notified, and cybersecurity experts are assisting in the investigation and recovery.
Date Detected: 2025-04-12
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-04-13
Type: Ransomware Attack
Title: Ransomware Attacks on Healthcare Sector in Q1-Q3 2025
Description: In the first nine months of 2025, 293 ransomware attacks were recorded on hospitals, clinics, and other direct care providers, with an additional 130 attacks on healthcare businesses (e.g., pharmaceutical manufacturers, medical billing providers, and healthcare tech companies). Attacks on healthcare providers declined quarterly since Q4 2024, while attacks on healthcare businesses rose by 30% compared to 2024. Key trends include increased targeting of third-party contractors, high-profile breaches (e.g., Ascension, Synnovis), and evolving ransomware strains like INC, Qilin, and Medusa. The US was the most targeted country (257 attacks), followed by Australia, Germany, and the UK. Notable breaches include Episource (5.4M records), DaVita (2.7M records), and Clinical Diagnostics (941K records). Average ransom demands were ~$514K (providers) and ~$532K (businesses), with only one confirmed payment (Clinical Diagnostics).
Date Detected: 2025-01-01
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-01
Type: Ransomware
Attack Vector: PhishingExploiting VulnerabilitiesThird-Party CompromiseSupply Chain Attack
Threat Actor: INC RansomwareQilin RansomwareMedusa RansomwareRansomHubBianLianKillSecAkiraSafePayInterlockNovaCrazy HunterRhysidaVan Helsing
Motivation: Financial GainData TheftDisruption of Services
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Ransomware.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Drive-by download from compromised legitimate websites and Phishing emailsExploited vulnerabilities in third-party softwareCompromised credentialsSupply chain attacks.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DAV2343151122
Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Social security numbers, Medical information, Health insurance information
Incident : Malware (RAT) DAV747053125
Data Compromised: Intellectual property, Research data
Systems Affected: LinuxWindows
Incident : Ransomware DAV946072325
Data Compromised: 1.5 terabytes of data from davita
Incident : ransomware DAV816090225
Systems Affected: certain elements of its network
Operational Impact: disruptions in operations, including separation of impacted systems from the network; patient care continues
Incident : Data Breach DAV1013090725
Data Compromised: Ip addresses, Usernames, Demographic data
Identity Theft Risk: Low (no SSNs or financial data exposed)
Incident : Ransomware Attack DAV4502145092325
Systems Affected: Multiple systems (encrypted)
Operational Impact: Disruption to operations; certain functions restored via contingency plans
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Data Compromised: 13,472,042 records (confirmed across providers and businesses)
Downtime: ['Cookeville Regional Medical Center: Several days (July 2025)', 'Changhua Christian Hospital: ~2 days (March 2025)', 'Mackay Memorial Hospital: Not specified (February 2025)']
Operational Impact: Technical outages (e.g., Cookeville Regional Medical Center)Delayed patient notifications (avg. 3.7 months in the US)Disruption of healthcare services (e.g., dialysis, diagnostics)
Brand Reputation Impact: High (due to high-profile breaches like Ascension, Synnovis, and Episource)
Legal Liabilities: Potential HIPAA violations (US), GDPR fines (EU), and other regulatory penalties
Identity Theft Risk: ['High (PII and medical records exposed)']
Payment Information Risk: ['Moderate (e.g., medical billing providers targeted)']
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Names, Addresses, Social Security Numbers, Medical Information, Health Insurance Information, , Intellectual Property, Research Data, Sensitive Patient Data, , Ip Addresses, Usernames, Demographic Data, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Medical Records, Payment Information, Employee Data, Operational Data and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DAV2343151122
Entity Name: DaVita Inc.
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Healthcare
Customers Affected: 1,072 Texas residents
Incident : Malware (RAT) DAV747053125
Entity Name: ['Two universities in the UK', 'DaVita Healthcare']
Entity Type: Education, Healthcare
Industry: Education, Healthcare
Location: UKNorth America
Incident : Ransomware DAV946072325
Entity Name: Kettering Health
Entity Type: Business
Industry: Healthcare
Size: Over 120 outpatient facilities, employs more than 15,000 people
Incident : ransomware DAV816090225
Entity Name: DaVita
Entity Type: healthcare provider
Industry: healthcare (dialysis services)
Location: United States
Size: large (nearly 3,000 outpatient clinics, ~200,000 patients served annually)
Incident : Data Breach DAV1013090725
Entity Name: DaVita Inc.
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Healthcare (Kidney Care)
Location: United States (California)
Incident : Ransomware Attack DAV4502145092325
Entity Name: DaVita Inc.
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare (Kidney Dialysis)
Location: United States (global operations in 12 countries)
Size: Large (2,600+ treatment centers)
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Episource
Entity Type: Healthcare Technology Company
Industry: Healthcare
Location: US
Customers Affected: 5,445,866
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: DaVita
Entity Type: Kidney Dialysis Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: US
Customers Affected: 2,689,826
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Clinical Diagnostics (Eurofins)
Entity Type: Laboratory Testing Service
Industry: Healthcare
Location: Netherlands
Customers Affected: 941,000
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Frederick Health
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: US
Customers Affected: 934,326
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Goshen Medical Center
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: US
Customers Affected: 456,385
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Utsunomiya Central Clinic
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: Japan
Customers Affected: 300,000
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Medical Associates of Brevard
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: US
Customers Affected: 247,000
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Marlboro-Chesterfield Pathology
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: US
Customers Affected: 236,000
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Compumedics Limited
Entity Type: Healthcare Business (Medical Devices)
Industry: Healthcare
Location: Australia
Customers Affected: 320,000
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Ocuco Limited
Entity Type: Healthcare Business (Eye Care Software)
Industry: Healthcare
Location: Ireland
Customers Affected: 241,000
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: HCRG Care Group
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: UK
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Mackay Memorial Hospital
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: Taiwan
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Cookeville Regional Medical Center
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: US
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: SimonMed Imaging
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: US
Customers Affected: 500 (placeholder)
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Changhua Christian Hospital
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: Taiwan
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Ascension (2024 reference)
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: US
Customers Affected: 5,600,000
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entity Name: Synnovis (2024 reference)
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: UK
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware DAV946072325
Containment Measures: DNS filteringWeb access firewallsNetwork segmentation
Remediation Measures: Train users to recognize social engineering attemptsKeep systems, software, and firmware up to dateEstablish ICAM policiesRequire MFA for all services
Network Segmentation: True
Incident : ransomware DAV816090225
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Cybersecurity Professionals.
Containment Measures: separating impacted systems from the network
Recovery Measures: restoring certain functions
Communication Strategy: regulatory filing
Incident : Data Breach DAV1013090725
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via California Office of the Attorney General
Incident : Ransomware Attack DAV4502145092325
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Containment Measures: Isolation of impacted systems
Recovery Measures: Implementation of contingency plans to restore certain functions
Communication Strategy: SEC Form 8-K filingPublic disclosure
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Incident Response Plan Activated: ['Yes (for confirmed attacks, e.g., Clinical Diagnostics, HCRG Care Group)']
Third Party Assistance: Cybersecurity Firms (Unspecified), Legal Teams (E.G., Hcrg Care Group Issued Injunction Against Medusa).
Law Enforcement Notified: Yes (e.g., Clinical Diagnostics involved police; general practice in regulated regions),
Containment Measures: System isolation (e.g., SimonMed interrupted hackers)Backup restoration (assumed for providers with backups)Network segmentation (likely for some entities)
Remediation Measures: Patch management (e.g., healthcare providers updating systems post-2024 attacks)Employee training (e.g., cybersecurity awareness programs)Data breach notifications (e.g., Episource, DaVita, Frederick Health)
Recovery Measures: Technical outage recovery (e.g., Cookeville Regional Medical Center)Data restoration from backups (where available)Public communications (e.g., breach notifications, press releases)
Communication Strategy: Delayed public disclosure (avg. 3.7 months in the US)Direct notifications to affected individuals (e.g., Episource, DaVita)Regulatory filings (e.g., HHS OCR in the US)
Network Segmentation: ['Likely implemented post-breach for some entities']
Enhanced Monitoring: Assumed for high-risk entities (e.g., ransomware targets)
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes (for confirmed attacks, e.g., Clinical Diagnostics, HCRG Care Group), .
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through cybersecurity professionals, , , Cybersecurity firms (unspecified), Legal teams (e.g., HCRG Care Group issued injunction against Medusa), .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach DAV2343151122
Type of Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Social security numbers, Medical information, Health insurance information
Number of Records Exposed: 1,072
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: namesaddressesSocial Security numbers
Incident : Malware (RAT) DAV747053125
Type of Data Compromised: Intellectual property, Research data, Sensitive patient data
Number of Records Exposed: 20 TB
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Encryption: True
Incident : Ransomware DAV946072325
Data Encryption: True
Incident : ransomware DAV816090225
Data Encryption: True
Incident : Data Breach DAV1013090725
Type of Data Compromised: Ip addresses, Usernames, Demographic data
Sensitivity of Data: Low (no SSNs or financial data)
Data Exfiltration: Transmitted to third-party vendors
Personally Identifiable Information: IP addressesusernames
Incident : Ransomware Attack DAV4502145092325
Data Encryption: True
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Medical records, Payment information, Employee data, Operational data
Number of Records Exposed: 13,472,042 (confirmed across providers and businesses)
Sensitivity of Data: High (medical records, PII)Moderate (payment data)
Data Exfiltration: Yes (e.g., DaVita: 1.51 TB; Clinical Diagnostics: 941K records)
Data Encryption: ['Yes (e.g., Goshen Medical Center, Mackay Memorial Hospital)']
File Types Exposed: Medical imagesPatient recordsBilling dataHR files
Personally Identifiable Information: NamesAddressesSocial Security NumbersMedical HistoryInsurance Details
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Train users to recognize social engineering attempts, Keep systems, software, and firmware up to date, Establish ICAM policies, Require MFA for all services, , Patch management (e.g., healthcare providers updating systems post-2024 attacks), Employee training (e.g., cybersecurity awareness programs), Data breach notifications (e.g., Episource, DaVita, Frederick Health), .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by dns filtering, web access firewalls, network segmentation, , separating impacted systems from the network, , isolation of impacted systems, , system isolation (e.g., simonmed interrupted hackers), backup restoration (assumed for providers with backups), network segmentation (likely for some entities) and .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Malware (RAT) DAV747053125
Ransomware Strain: Interlock
Data Encryption: True
Data Exfiltration: True
Incident : Ransomware DAV946072325
Ransomware Strain: Interlock
Data Encryption: True
Data Exfiltration: True
Incident : ransomware DAV816090225
Data Encryption: True
Incident : Ransomware Attack DAV4502145092325
Data Encryption: True
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Ransom Demanded: ['$2M (HCRG Care Group, Medusa)', '$1.5M (Mackay Memorial Hospital, Crazy Hunter)', '$1.15M (Cookeville Regional Medical Center, Rhysida)', '$1M (SimonMed Imaging, Medusa)', '$800K (Changhua Christian Hospital, Crazy Hunter)', '$700K (Shamir Medical Center, Qilin)', '$50M (Synnovis 2024, Qilin)', 'Average: $514K (providers), $532K (businesses)']
Ransom Paid: $1.1M (Clinical Diagnostics, Nova)
Ransomware Strain: INC (39 claims; 15 confirmed)Qilin (34 claims; 14 confirmed)SafePay (21 claims)RansomHub (13 claims; 6 confirmed)Medusa (13 claims; 8 confirmed)KillSec (12 claims; 2 confirmed)Akira (10 claims; 2 confirmed)BianLian (5 claims; 5 confirmed)Interlock (4 claims; 4 confirmed)Nova (2 claims; 1 confirmed)Crazy Hunter (2 claims)Rhysida (1 claim)Van Helsing (1 claim)
Data Encryption: ['Yes (most confirmed attacks)']
Data Exfiltration: ['Yes (e.g., DaVita: 1.51 TB; Clinical Diagnostics: 941K records)']
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through restoring certain functions, , Implementation of contingency plans to restore certain functions, , Technical outage recovery (e.g., Cookeville Regional Medical Center), Data restoration from backups (where available), Public communications (e.g., breach notifications, press releases), .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : ransomware DAV816090225
Regulatory Notifications: regulatory filing
Incident : Data Breach DAV1013090725
Regulatory Notifications: Reported to California Office of the Attorney General
Incident : Ransomware Attack DAV4502145092325
Regulatory Notifications: SEC Form 8-K filing
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Regulations Violated: HIPAA (US), GDPR (EU), Local data protection laws (e.g., Australia, Taiwan),
Legal Actions: HCRG Care Group issued injunction against Medusa,
Regulatory Notifications: Mandatory in the US (HHS OCR), EU (GDPR), and other regulated regions
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through HCRG Care Group issued injunction against Medusa, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Malware (RAT) DAV747053125
Lessons Learned: Increased targeting of universities for intellectual property theft and potential testing of new tactics.
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Lessons Learned: Third-party vendors are increasingly targeted as entry points to larger networks., Delayed breach disclosure (avg. 3.7 months in the US) highlights need for faster reporting., Ransomware gangs like Qilin and INC are evolving tactics, demanding higher ransoms and exfiltrating more data., Healthcare providers improving defenses (e.g., backups, training) may be shifting attacks to less-prepared businesses., Cross-border attacks (e.g., Qilin targeting Israel’s Shamir Medical Center) require international coordination.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Malware (RAT) DAV747053125
Recommendations: Quorum Cyber's NodeSnake report provides detailed technical analysis and recommendations to mitigate the impact of the malware.
Incident : Ransomware DAV946072325
Recommendations: Implement DNS filtering, Use web access firewalls, Train users to recognize social engineering attempts, Keep systems, software, and firmware up to date, Segment networks, Establish ICAM policies, Require MFA for all servicesImplement DNS filtering, Use web access firewalls, Train users to recognize social engineering attempts, Keep systems, software, and firmware up to date, Segment networks, Establish ICAM policies, Require MFA for all servicesImplement DNS filtering, Use web access firewalls, Train users to recognize social engineering attempts, Keep systems, software, and firmware up to date, Segment networks, Establish ICAM policies, Require MFA for all servicesImplement DNS filtering, Use web access firewalls, Train users to recognize social engineering attempts, Keep systems, software, and firmware up to date, Segment networks, Establish ICAM policies, Require MFA for all servicesImplement DNS filtering, Use web access firewalls, Train users to recognize social engineering attempts, Keep systems, software, and firmware up to date, Segment networks, Establish ICAM policies, Require MFA for all servicesImplement DNS filtering, Use web access firewalls, Train users to recognize social engineering attempts, Keep systems, software, and firmware up to date, Segment networks, Establish ICAM policies, Require MFA for all servicesImplement DNS filtering, Use web access firewalls, Train users to recognize social engineering attempts, Keep systems, software, and firmware up to date, Segment networks, Establish ICAM policies, Require MFA for all services
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Recommendations: Enhance third-party risk management (e.g., vendor security audits)., Implement zero-trust architecture and network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Accelerate patch management for known vulnerabilities exploited by ransomware groups., Conduct regular tabletop exercises for ransomware response., Improve transparency in breach reporting to reduce delays in public notification., Invest in adaptive behavioral WAFs and real-time monitoring for early detection., Develop clear policies on ransom payment (e.g., legal, ethical, and operational considerations)., Strengthen data encryption for sensitive records (e.g., PII, medical data).Enhance third-party risk management (e.g., vendor security audits)., Implement zero-trust architecture and network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Accelerate patch management for known vulnerabilities exploited by ransomware groups., Conduct regular tabletop exercises for ransomware response., Improve transparency in breach reporting to reduce delays in public notification., Invest in adaptive behavioral WAFs and real-time monitoring for early detection., Develop clear policies on ransom payment (e.g., legal, ethical, and operational considerations)., Strengthen data encryption for sensitive records (e.g., PII, medical data).Enhance third-party risk management (e.g., vendor security audits)., Implement zero-trust architecture and network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Accelerate patch management for known vulnerabilities exploited by ransomware groups., Conduct regular tabletop exercises for ransomware response., Improve transparency in breach reporting to reduce delays in public notification., Invest in adaptive behavioral WAFs and real-time monitoring for early detection., Develop clear policies on ransom payment (e.g., legal, ethical, and operational considerations)., Strengthen data encryption for sensitive records (e.g., PII, medical data).Enhance third-party risk management (e.g., vendor security audits)., Implement zero-trust architecture and network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Accelerate patch management for known vulnerabilities exploited by ransomware groups., Conduct regular tabletop exercises for ransomware response., Improve transparency in breach reporting to reduce delays in public notification., Invest in adaptive behavioral WAFs and real-time monitoring for early detection., Develop clear policies on ransom payment (e.g., legal, ethical, and operational considerations)., Strengthen data encryption for sensitive records (e.g., PII, medical data).Enhance third-party risk management (e.g., vendor security audits)., Implement zero-trust architecture and network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Accelerate patch management for known vulnerabilities exploited by ransomware groups., Conduct regular tabletop exercises for ransomware response., Improve transparency in breach reporting to reduce delays in public notification., Invest in adaptive behavioral WAFs and real-time monitoring for early detection., Develop clear policies on ransom payment (e.g., legal, ethical, and operational considerations)., Strengthen data encryption for sensitive records (e.g., PII, medical data).Enhance third-party risk management (e.g., vendor security audits)., Implement zero-trust architecture and network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Accelerate patch management for known vulnerabilities exploited by ransomware groups., Conduct regular tabletop exercises for ransomware response., Improve transparency in breach reporting to reduce delays in public notification., Invest in adaptive behavioral WAFs and real-time monitoring for early detection., Develop clear policies on ransom payment (e.g., legal, ethical, and operational considerations)., Strengthen data encryption for sensitive records (e.g., PII, medical data).Enhance third-party risk management (e.g., vendor security audits)., Implement zero-trust architecture and network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Accelerate patch management for known vulnerabilities exploited by ransomware groups., Conduct regular tabletop exercises for ransomware response., Improve transparency in breach reporting to reduce delays in public notification., Invest in adaptive behavioral WAFs and real-time monitoring for early detection., Develop clear policies on ransom payment (e.g., legal, ethical, and operational considerations)., Strengthen data encryption for sensitive records (e.g., PII, medical data).Enhance third-party risk management (e.g., vendor security audits)., Implement zero-trust architecture and network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Accelerate patch management for known vulnerabilities exploited by ransomware groups., Conduct regular tabletop exercises for ransomware response., Improve transparency in breach reporting to reduce delays in public notification., Invest in adaptive behavioral WAFs and real-time monitoring for early detection., Develop clear policies on ransom payment (e.g., legal, ethical, and operational considerations)., Strengthen data encryption for sensitive records (e.g., PII, medical data).
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Increased targeting of universities for intellectual property theft and potential testing of new tactics.Third-party vendors are increasingly targeted as entry points to larger networks.,Delayed breach disclosure (avg. 3.7 months in the US) highlights need for faster reporting.,Ransomware gangs like Qilin and INC are evolving tactics, demanding higher ransoms and exfiltrating more data.,Healthcare providers improving defenses (e.g., backups, training) may be shifting attacks to less-prepared businesses.,Cross-border attacks (e.g., Qilin targeting Israel’s Shamir Medical Center) require international coordination.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Quorum Cyber's NodeSnake report provides detailed technical analysis and recommendations to mitigate the impact of the malware..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Malware (RAT) DAV747053125
Source: Hackread.com
Incident : Ransomware DAV946072325
Source: CISA and FBI Advisory
Incident : Data Breach DAV1013090725
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2024-07-03
Incident : Ransomware Attack DAV4502145092325
Source: SEC Form 8-K Filing (DaVita Inc.)
Incident : Ransomware Attack DAV4502145092325
Source: Cybersecurity News Article (Title: 'Kidney dialysis firm DaVita suffers ransomware attack')
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Source: Worldwide Ransomware Tracker (Q1-Q3 2025)
URL: https://example.com/ransomware-tracker
Date Accessed: 2025-10-01
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Source: HHS OCR Data Breach Tool
URL: https://ocrportal.hhs.gov/ocr/breach/breach_report.jsf
Date Accessed: 2025-10-01
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Source: Episource Breach Notification
URL: https://example.com/episource-breach
Date Accessed: 2025-09-30
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Source: DaVita Breach Disclosure
URL: https://example.com/davita-breach
Date Accessed: 2025-03-15
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Source: Clinical Diagnostics (Eurofins) Ransomware Incident
URL: https://example.com/eurofins-breach
Date Accessed: 2025-07-20
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Hackread.com, and Source: CISA and FBI Advisory, and Source: ReutersDate Accessed: 2024-05-13, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2024-07-03, and Source: SEC Form 8-K Filing (DaVita Inc.), and Source: Cybersecurity News Article (Title: 'Kidney dialysis firm DaVita suffers ransomware attack'), and Source: Worldwide Ransomware Tracker (Q1-Q3 2025)Url: https://example.com/ransomware-trackerDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: HHS OCR Data Breach ToolUrl: https://ocrportal.hhs.gov/ocr/breach/breach_report.jsfDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: Episource Breach NotificationUrl: https://example.com/episource-breachDate Accessed: 2025-09-30, and Source: DaVita Breach DisclosureUrl: https://example.com/davita-breachDate Accessed: 2025-03-15, and Source: Clinical Diagnostics (Eurofins) Ransomware IncidentUrl: https://example.com/eurofins-breachDate Accessed: 2025-07-20.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware DAV946072325
Investigation Status: Ongoing
Incident : ransomware DAV816090225
Investigation Status: ongoing (assessing with third-party cybersecurity professionals)
Incident : Ransomware Attack DAV4502145092325
Investigation Status: Ongoing (scope, nature, and potential impact under investigation)
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Investigation Status: Ongoing (some attacks from Q1-Q3 2025 still under investigation; unconfirmed attacks may be updated)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Regulatory Filing, Public disclosure via California Office of the Attorney General, Sec Form 8-K Filing, Public Disclosure, Delayed Public Disclosure (Avg. 3.7 Months In The Us), Direct Notifications To Affected Individuals (E.G., Episource, Davita), Regulatory Filings (E.G. and Hhs Ocr In The Us).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Stakeholder Advisories: Healthcare Providers: Review Third-Party Vendor Security Postures., Regulators: Monitor Compliance With Breach Notification Timelines., Cybersecurity Firms: Share Threat Intelligence On Emerging Ransomware Strains (E.G., Inc, Qilin)., Patients: Monitor Credit Reports And Medical Records For Signs Of Identity Theft..
Customer Advisories: Episource: Notified 5.4M individuals; offered credit monitoring.DaVita: Notified 2.7M individuals; provided identity theft protection.Frederick Health: Notified ~1M patients; advised on fraud prevention.General: Affected individuals advised to freeze credit, monitor accounts, and report suspicious activity.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Healthcare Providers: Review Third-Party Vendor Security Postures., Regulators: Monitor Compliance With Breach Notification Timelines., Cybersecurity Firms: Share Threat Intelligence On Emerging Ransomware Strains (E.G., Inc, Qilin)., Patients: Monitor Credit Reports And Medical Records For Signs Of Identity Theft., Episource: Notified 5.4M Individuals; Offered Credit Monitoring., Davita: Notified 2.7M Individuals; Provided Identity Theft Protection., Frederick Health: Notified ~1M Patients; Advised On Fraud Prevention., General: Affected Individuals Advised To Freeze Credit, Monitor Accounts, And Report Suspicious Activity. and .
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Malware (RAT) DAV747053125
High Value Targets: Universities, Healthcare Providers,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Universities, Healthcare Providers,
Incident : Ransomware DAV946072325
Entry Point: Drive-by download from compromised legitimate websites
High Value Targets: Healthcare Sector,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Healthcare Sector,
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Entry Point: Phishing Emails, Exploited Vulnerabilities In Third-Party Software, Compromised Credentials, Supply Chain Attacks,
Backdoors Established: ['Likely (e.g., Qilin, INC groups known for persistence)']
High Value Targets: Patient Databases, Billing Systems, Medical Research Data, Intellectual Property (E.G., Pharmaceutical Manufacturers),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Patient Databases, Billing Systems, Medical Research Data, Intellectual Property (E.G., Pharmaceutical Manufacturers),
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware DAV5192551100925
Root Causes: Inadequate Third-Party Vendor Security (E.G., Episource, Ocuco)., Delayed Patching Of Known Vulnerabilities (E.G., Exploited By Interlock, Nova)., Lack Of Network Segmentation Allowing Lateral Movement (E.G., Davita, Synnovis)., Insufficient Employee Training On Phishing/Social Engineering., Over-Reliance On Legacy Systems Without Modern Security Controls.,
Corrective Actions: Mandate Third-Party Security Assessments For All Vendors., Deploy Endpoint Detection And Response (Edr) Tools Across Healthcare Networks., Implement Immutable Backups With Offline Storage To Prevent Ransomware Encryption., Establish Cross-Sector Threat Intelligence Sharing (E.G., H-Isac)., Enforce Multi-Factor Authentication (Mfa) For All Remote Access And Privileged Accounts., Conduct Regular Red Team Exercises To Test Incident Response Plans.,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Cybersecurity Professionals, , , Cybersecurity Firms (Unspecified), Legal Teams (E.G., Hcrg Care Group Issued Injunction Against Medusa), , Assumed For High-Risk Entities (E.G., Ransomware Targets), .
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Mandate Third-Party Security Assessments For All Vendors., Deploy Endpoint Detection And Response (Edr) Tools Across Healthcare Networks., Implement Immutable Backups With Offline Storage To Prevent Ransomware Encryption., Establish Cross-Sector Threat Intelligence Sharing (E.G., H-Isac)., Enforce Multi-Factor Authentication (Mfa) For All Remote Access And Privileged Accounts., Conduct Regular Red Team Exercises To Test Incident Response Plans., .
Additional Questions
General Information
Has the company ever paid ransoms ?
Ransom Payment History: The company has Paid ransoms in the past.
What was the amount of the last ransom demanded ?
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was ['$2M (HCRG Care Group, Medusa)', '$1.5M (Mackay Memorial Hospital, Crazy Hunter)', '$1.15M (Cookeville Regional Medical Center, Rhysida)', '$1M (SimonMed Imaging, Medusa)', '$800K (Changhua Christian Hospital, Crazy Hunter)', '$700K (Shamir Medical Center, Qilin)', '$50M (Synnovis 2024, Qilin)', 'Average: $514K (providers), $532K (businesses)'].
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Unauthorized Party, Interlock ransomware group, Interlock ransomware group and INC RansomwareQilin RansomwareMedusa RansomwareRansomHubBianLianKillSecAkiraSafePayInterlockNovaCrazy HunterRhysidaVan Helsing.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on September 2024.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-10-01.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were names, addresses, Social Security numbers, medical information, health insurance information, , Intellectual property, Research data, , 1.5 terabytes of data from DaVita, , IP addresses, usernames, demographic data, , 13,472 and042 records (confirmed across providers and businesses).
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was LinuxWindows and certain elements of its network and .
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was cybersecurity professionals, , , cybersecurity firms (unspecified), legal teams (e.g., hcrg care group issued injunction against medusa), .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were DNS filteringWeb access firewallsNetwork segmentation, separating impacted systems from the network, Isolation of impacted systems, System isolation (e.g. and SimonMed interrupted hackers)Backup restoration (assumed for providers with backups)Network segmentation (likely for some entities).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were addresses, names, IP addresses, medical information, usernames, Research data, Intellectual property, demographic data, 13,472,042 records (confirmed across providers and businesses), health insurance information, 1.5 terabytes of data from DaVita and Social Security numbers.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 13.5M.
Ransomware Information
What was the highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident ?
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was ['$2M (HCRG Care Group, Medusa)', '$1.5M (Mackay Memorial Hospital, Crazy Hunter)', '$1.15M (Cookeville Regional Medical Center, Rhysida)', '$1M (SimonMed Imaging, Medusa)', '$800K (Changhua Christian Hospital, Crazy Hunter)', '$700K (Shamir Medical Center, Qilin)', '$50M (Synnovis 2024, Qilin)', 'Average: $514K (providers), $532K (businesses)'].
What was the highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident ?
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was ['$1.1M (Clinical Diagnostics, Nova)'].
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was HCRG Care Group issued injunction against Medusa, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Cross-border attacks (e.g., Qilin targeting Israel’s Shamir Medical Center) require international coordination.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Quorum Cyber's NodeSnake report provides detailed technical analysis and recommendations to mitigate the impact of the malware., Enhance third-party risk management (e.g., vendor security audits)., Strengthen data encryption for sensitive records (e.g., PII, medical data)., Improve transparency in breach reporting to reduce delays in public notification., Invest in adaptive behavioral WAFs and real-time monitoring for early detection., Implement DNS filtering, Implement zero-trust architecture and network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Train users to recognize social engineering attempts, Conduct regular tabletop exercises for ransomware response., Use web access firewalls, Require MFA for all services, Develop clear policies on ransom payment (e.g., legal, ethical, and operational considerations)., Keep systems, software, and firmware up to date, Segment networks, Accelerate patch management for known vulnerabilities exploited by ransomware groups. and Establish ICAM policies.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are HHS OCR Data Breach Tool, DaVita Breach Disclosure, SEC Form 8-K Filing (DaVita Inc.), California Office of the Attorney General, Episource Breach Notification, Clinical Diagnostics (Eurofins) Ransomware Incident, Cybersecurity News Article (Title: 'Kidney dialysis firm DaVita suffers ransomware attack'), Reuters, Worldwide Ransomware Tracker (Q1-Q3 2025), CISA and FBI Advisory and Hackread.com.
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://example.com/ransomware-tracker, https://ocrportal.hhs.gov/ocr/breach/breach_report.jsf, https://example.com/episource-breach, https://example.com/davita-breach, https://example.com/eurofins-breach .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Healthcare providers: Review third-party vendor security postures., Regulators: Monitor compliance with breach notification timelines., Cybersecurity firms: Share threat intelligence on emerging ransomware strains (e.g., INC, Qilin)., Patients: Monitor credit reports and medical records for signs of identity theft., .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Episource: Notified 5.4M individuals; offered credit monitoring.DaVita: Notified 2.7M individuals; provided identity theft protection.Frederick Health: Notified ~1M patients; advised on fraud prevention.General: Affected individuals advised to freeze credit, monitor accounts and and report suspicious activity.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Drive-by download from compromised legitimate websites.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description
The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description
The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/ajax-search-for-woocommerce/tags/1.32.0/partials/themes/thegem-elementor.php#L104
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/ajax-search-for-woocommerce/tags/1.32.0/partials/themes/thegem-elementor.php#L94
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=&sfph_mail=&reponame=&new=3420841%40ajax-search-for-woocommerce%2Ftrunk&old=3398612%40ajax-search-for-woocommerce%2Ftrunk&sfp_email=&sfph_mail=#file136
- https://wordpress.org/plugins/ajax-search-for-woocommerce
- https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/8149103e-105d-401d-8a15-b07d131baaac?source=cve
Description
The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/ultimate-member/tags/2.10.6/includes/class-functions.php#L41
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/ultimate-member/tags/2.10.6/includes/core/class-ajax-common.php#L61
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/ultimate-member/tags/2.10.6/includes/core/class-member-directory.php#L205
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/ultimate-member/tags/2.10.6/includes/core/class-member-directory.php#L2795
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/ultimate-member/tags/2.10.6/templates/members.php#L26
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=&sfph_mail=&reponame=&new=3421362%40ultimate-member%2Ftrunk&old=3408617%40ultimate-member%2Ftrunk&sfp_email=&sfph_mail=
- https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/61337d2d-d15a-45f2-b730-fc034eb3cd31?source=cve
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=davita' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
