Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (VIP1773145966)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Viper's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Viper Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Viper breach identified under incident ID VIP1773145966.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Viper's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/viper, the number of followers: 1543, the industry type: Machinery Manufacturing and the number of employees: 140 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 746 and after the incident was 735 with a difference of -11 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Viper and their customers.
A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "New VIP Keylogger Malware Campaign Targets Credentials via Phishing and Stealthy Execution", has drawn attention.
A recently uncovered malware campaign is deploying VIP Keylogger to steal credentials through sophisticated phishing tactics, hidden payloads, and in-memory execution techniques.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Windows systems with Chromium-based browsers (Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, Vivaldi), Firefox-based browsers, email clients, chat applications, file transfer tools, and exposing Saved logins, cookies, credit card details, autofill data, download history, browsing URLs, browser credentials, email client credentials, chat application credentials, file transfer tool credentials.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating attacks begin with social engineering, luring victims into opening a seemingly legitimate purchase order attachment and Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating rAR archive containing a malicious executable. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating luring victims into opening a seemingly legitimate purchase order attachment and Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (T1059.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating loaded VIP Keylogger via the Common Language Runtime (CLR). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including aES-encrypted payload in its .data section, and hidden PNG image using steganography, Process Injection: Process Hollowing (T1055.012) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating process hollowing launching a legitimate process in suspended mode, replacing its memory with malicious code, Reflective Code Loading (T1620) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating loads its final payload directly into memory, avoiding disk-based detection, and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating disabled Windows security monitoring (AMSI and ETW). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Input Capture: Keylogging (T1056.001) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating vIP Keylogger to harvest sensitive data from browsers, email clients, chat applications, Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating saved logins, cookies, credit card details, autofill data from Chromium-based browsers, and Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers (T1555.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating firefox-based browser credentials via PK11SDR_Decrypt API from nss3.dll. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating harvest sensitive data from browsers, email clients, chat applications, and file transfer tools and Automated Collection (T1119) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating vIP Keylogger targets a wide range of sensitive data, including saved logins, cookies, credit card details. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltration via FTP, SMTP (port 587), Telegram, Discord, and HTTP POST and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltration via Telegram, Discord, and HTTP POST. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Viper Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/viper/incident/VIP1773145966
- Viper CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/viper
- Viper Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/vip1773145966-vip-keylogger-cyber-attack-march-2026/
- Viper CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/viper/history
- Viper CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://cyberpress.org/vip-keylogger-steals-credentials/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf