Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Victoria Falls TechnologyVictoria Falls Technology
VS
UK Ministry of DefenceUK Ministry of Defence
Victoria Falls Technology

Victoria Falls Technology

N/A

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://vftech.org/
746/1000Moderate

Victoria Falls Technology (VFTech) is the premier advisory firm for venture-backed technologies with dual-use commercial-defense usecases. VFTech has best-in-world insight into the full range of national security applications within the Departments of Defense, the Inte...

NAICS:336
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:23
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UK Ministry of Defence

UK Ministry of Defence

Ministry of Defence, Whitehall, London, GB, SW1A 2HB

Last Update: 13/07/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.gov.uk/mod
325/1000Critical

We defend the United Kingdom and its allies, at home and abroad.

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:30,825
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
12
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Victoria Falls Technology

Victoria Falls Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UK Ministry of Defence

UK Ministry of Defence

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Victoria Falls Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

UK Ministry of Defence has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Victoria Falls Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Victoria Falls Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UK Ministry of Defence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UK Ministry of Defence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Victoria Falls Technology

Victoria Falls Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UK Ministry of Defence

UK Ministry of Defence

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FORGOV1783297461
🔒 Incident : Breach
UK-5234752110425
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
UK-5562155102025

FAQ

Between Victoria Falls Technology company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology and UK Ministry of Defence, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology and UK Ministry of Defence, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Victoria Falls Technology or UK Ministry of Defence ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Victoria Falls Technology or UK Ministry of Defence ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology and UK Ministry of Defence, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Victoria Falls Technology and UK Ministry of Defence, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1