Comparison Overview

VF Corporation

VS

Tommy Hilfiger

VF Corporation

VF Corporation, Denver, CO, US, 80202
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 600 and 649

VF Corporation is one of the world’s largest apparel, footwear and accessories companies connecting people to the lifestyles, activities and experiences they cherish most through a family of iconic outdoor, active and workwear brands including Vans®, The North Face®, Timberland® and Dickies®. Our purpose is to power movements of sustainable and active lifestyles for the betterment of people and our planet. We believe that when you discover the difference between a career and a calling, you get so much more out of life. When those lines begin to blur, you start to limit yourself much less and start aiming for more. That’s what we want for everyone who joins us at VF. And frankly, that’s what it takes to thrive here too. For more information, please visit vfc.com.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 28,984
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Tommy Hilfiger

Danzigerkade 165, Amsterdam, North Holland, 1013, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

TOMMY HILFIGER is one of the world’s leading designer lifestyle brands creating a platform that inspires the modern American spirit, while committing to wasting nothing and welcoming all. Founded in 1985, Tommy Hilfiger delivers premium styling, quality and value to consumers worldwide under the TOMMY HILFIGER and TOMMY JEANS brands, with a breadth of collections including HILFIGER COLLECTION, TOMMY HILFIGER TAILORED, men’s, women’s and kids’ sportswear, denim, accessories, and footwear. In addition, the brand is licensed for a range of products, including fragrances, eyewear, watches and home furnishings. Founder Tommy Hilfiger remains the company’s Principal Designer and provides leadership and direction for the design process. Tommy Hilfiger, which was acquired by PVH Corp. in 2010, is a global apparel and retail company with more than 16,000 associates worldwide. With the support of strong global consumer recognition, Tommy Hilfiger has built an extensive distribution network in over 100 countries and more than 2,000 retail stores throughout North America, Europe, Latin America and the Asia Pacific region. Global retail sales of the TOMMY HILFIGER brand were US $9.2 billion in 2019.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 11,534
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vf-corporation.jpeg
VF Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tommy-hilfiger.jpeg
Tommy Hilfiger
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VF Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tommy Hilfiger
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VF Corporation in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tommy Hilfiger in 2026.

Incident History — VF Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VF Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tommy Hilfiger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tommy Hilfiger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vf-corporation.jpeg
VF Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tommy-hilfiger.jpeg
Tommy Hilfiger
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unsecured Database
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Tommy Hilfiger company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VF Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

VF Corporation company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Tommy Hilfiger company.

In the current year, Tommy Hilfiger company and VF Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tommy Hilfiger company nor VF Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Tommy Hilfiger company and VF Corporation company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

VF Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Tommy Hilfiger company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither VF Corporation company nor Tommy Hilfiger company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither VF Corporation nor Tommy Hilfiger holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tommy Hilfiger company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to VF Corporation company.

VF Corporation company employs more people globally than Tommy Hilfiger company, reflecting its scale as a Retail Apparel and Fashion.

Neither VF Corporation nor Tommy Hilfiger holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VF Corporation nor Tommy Hilfiger holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VF Corporation nor Tommy Hilfiger holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VF Corporation nor Tommy Hilfiger holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VF Corporation nor Tommy Hilfiger holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VF Corporation nor Tommy Hilfiger holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N