Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (VESNOR1780527378)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Vestas's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Vestas Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Vestas breach identified under incident ID VESNOR1780527378.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Vestas's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/vestas, the number of followers: 1223584, the industry type: Renewable Energy Equipment Manufacturing and the number of employees: 31615 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 757 and after the incident was 670 with a difference of -87 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Vestas and their customers.
On 02 April 2023, Nordex disclosed Cyberattack issues under the banner "Nordex Cyberattack and IT Systems Shutdown".
German wind turbine manufacturer Nordex has taken its IT systems offline following a cyberattack detected on 31 March.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting IT systems across multiple locations and business units.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like IT systems shutdown across multiple locations and business units, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement on 2 April.
The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Customers, employees, and stakeholders may be impacted.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), with evidence including cyberattack detected on 31 March, and iT systems across multiple locations and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating pattern of cyber threats targeting the renewable energy sector. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including cyberattack detected, and iT systems shutdown as precaution. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including type such as Ransomware, and iT systems taken offline to contain breach and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating shutdown of systems across multiple locations and business units. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating iT systems taken offline following cyberattack and Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (T1070.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating incident response team assembled to contain breach. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating systems across multiple locations and business units affected. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating pattern of cyber threats in sector (e.g., Vestas Lockbit attack). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Vestas Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/vestas/incident/VESNOR1780527378
- Vestas CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/vestas
- Vestas Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/vesnor1780527378-vestas-nordex-ransomware-april-2022/
- Vestas CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/vestas/history
- Vestas CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.windpowermonthly.com/article/1751954/wind-turbine-maker-nordex-shuts-down-systems-cyber-attack-hits
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf