Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Verizon » VERGOOECL1773851169

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (VERGOOECL1773851169)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-10
Company Score Before Incident367 / 1000
Company Score After Incident357 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERVERGOOECL1773851169
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORBrute-force SSH credentials, Exploitation of unpatched network devices, File transfer utilities (wget, curl, tftp, ftpget)
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE05/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Verizon's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Verizon Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Verizon breach identified under incident ID VERGOOECL1773851169.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Verizon's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/verizon, the number of followers: 1455266, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 101542 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 367 and after the incident was 357 with a difference of -10 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Verizon and their customers.

On 06 March 2026, a cybersecurity incident called "New Malware Strains Exploit Network Devices for DDoS and Crypto Mining" came to light.

On March 6, 2026, security researchers uncovered two previously undetected malware strains CondiBot and Monaco targeting Linux-based routers, IoT devices, and enterprise network equipment.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Linux-based routers, IoT devices and Enterprise network equipment.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as The incident underscores the growing threat to network infrastructure due to unpatched devices and weak credentials, as well as the visibility gap in enterprise security for embedded firmware. Persistence mechanisms like hardware watchdog manipulation make infections difficult to remove without physical intervention, and recommending next steps like Improve patch management for network devices, Enforce strong SSH credentials and Enhance monitoring for embedded firmware in network appliances.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including exploitation of unpatched network devices, and 8x increase in exploits targeting network devices and External Remote Services (T1133) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including brute-force SSH credentials to deploy malware, and monaco brute-forces weak SSH credentials. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating condiBot infects devices by cycling through file transfer utilities (wget, curl, tftp, ftpget) and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating malware executes payloads via file transfer utilities. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (T1543.003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating condiBot disables reboot utilities to maintain persistence and Compromise Client Software Binary (T1554) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating hardware watchdog manipulation for persistence. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exploitation of unpatched network devices for access. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Masquerading (T1036) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating malware evaded VirusTotal and ThreatFox until discovery, Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating condiBot disables reboot utilities, and Indicator Removal: Timestomp (T1070.006) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating malware strains evaded major threat intelligence platforms. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating monaco brute-forces weak SSH credentials. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating malware likely scans for system resources to monopolize. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating brute-force SSH credentials for lateral movement. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including monaco deploys Monero cryptocurrency mining software, and condiBot monopolizes system resources and Network Denial of Service (T1498) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating condiBot is a Mirai-based DDoS botnet with 32 attack modules. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
External Remote Services (90%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (80%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (70%)
Persistence
Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (50%)
Compromise Client Software Binary (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (70%)
Defense Evasion
Masquerading (80%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (70%)
Indicator Removal: Timestomp (50%)
Credential Access
Brute Force: Password Guessing (90%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (60%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (70%)
Impact
Resource Hijacking (90%)
Network Denial of Service (90%)

Sources & References