Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Verifone » VER1773304587

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (VER1773304587)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-19
Company Score Before Incident770 / 1000
Company Score After Incident751 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERVER1773304587
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDTransaction records and financial data
INCIDENT DATE11/03/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Verifone's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Verifone Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Verifone breach identified under incident ID VER1773304587.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Verifone's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/verifone, the number of followers: 135295, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 4704 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 770 and after the incident was 751 with a difference of -19 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Verifone and their customers.

On 12 March 2024, Verifone disclosed Cyberattack issues under the banner "Handala Hackers Disrupt Verifone’s POS Systems in Retaliatory Cyberattack".

On March 12, the pro-Palestinian cyber group Handala claimed responsibility for a sophisticated cyberattack targeting Verifone, a leading global provider of point-of-sale (POS) payment solutions in Israel.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Payment terminals and associated systems, and exposing Transaction records and financial data.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Warning issued to governments and companies collaborating with Verifone, particularly those allied with Israel, about potential harsher consequences.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sophisticated cyberattack targeting Verifone, a leading global provider of POS payment solutions and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating governments and companies collaborating with Verifone warned of harsher consequences. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating widespread disruption to Verifone’s payment terminals and associated systems and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating handala issued a warning to governments and companies collaborating with Verifone. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating extracted transaction records and financial data from Verifone’s systems. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed; transaction records and financial data compromised. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating transaction records and financial data extracted suggest access to sensitive credentials. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sophisticated attack described; likely used valid accounts for access and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating widespread disruption to payment terminals suggests defense impairment. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Trusted Relationship (50%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (40%)
Defacement (30%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (50%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (60%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)

Sources & References