Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Vanson Bourne » SOPVAN1777508803

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SOPVAN1777508803)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-113
Company Score Before Incident750 / 1000
Company Score After Incident637 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSOPVAN1777508803
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDData encryption (85% lower education,...
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2023
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Vanson Bourne's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Vanson Bourne Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Vanson Bourne breach identified under incident ID SOPVAN1777508803.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Vanson Bourne's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/vanson-bourne, the number of followers: 2072, the industry type: Market Research and the number of employees: 41 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 750 and after the incident was 637 with a difference of -113 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Vanson Bourne and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Ransomware in Education: Declining Attack Rates Mask Rising Costs and Recovery Challenges", has drawn attention.

Sophos’ latest annual report on ransomware in the education sector reveals a complex landscape, where declining attack rates contrast with soaring recovery costs and evolving attacker tactics.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting {'lower_education': '52% of computers impacted per attack', 'higher_education': '50% of computers impacted per attack'}, and exposing Data encryption (85% lower education, 77% higher education), plus an estimated financial loss of {'lower_education': '$3.76 million (2024 average recovery cost)', 'higher_education': '$4.02 million (2024 average recovery cost)'}.

In response, and began remediation that includes Backup restoration (75% lower education, 78% higher education), while recovery efforts such as Hybrid recovery strategies (65% lower education, 69% higher education) continue.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Improved backup strategies coexist with rising costs and increasingly aggressive attacker tactics targeting backups.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating declining attack rates contrast with evolving attacker tactics and External Remote Services (T1133) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating education sector faces higher attack rate than global average. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption affecting 85% lower education, 77% higher education. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attackers targeting backups (95% reported attempts). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Direct Volume Access (T1006) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 71% saw backups successfully breached and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption (85% lower education, 77% higher education). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption remains a persistent threat and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 95% reported attempts to compromise backups, 71% breached. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating financial gain motivation, median ransom payments up to $6.6M. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
External Remote Services (40%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Credential Access
Credentials from Password Stores (50%)
Defense Evasion
Direct Volume Access (70%)
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Inhibit System Recovery (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)

Sources & References