Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VDL Van Hool MacedoniaVDL Van Hool Macedonia
VS
Volkswagen do BrasilVolkswagen do Brasil
VDL Van Hool Macedonia

VDL Van Hool Macedonia

Technological Industrial Development Zone Skopje 2, 1041 Ilinden, 1000, MK

Last Update: 08/02/2026

View Profile
748/1000Moderate

Van Hool, established in 1947 by Bernard Van Hool and ever since a non-listed family-owned and -run business, is a Belgian manufacturer of buses, coaches and industrial vehicles. Van Hool has around 4,450 staff worldwide, the majority of whom of course work in the produ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:77
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Volkswagen do Brasil

Volkswagen do Brasil

Via Anchieta km 23,5, São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo, BR, 09823-901

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vw.com.br
788/1000Fair

A gente sabe que o nome “Volkswagen” com certeza deve fazer parte da sua história. Porque a gente também sabe que não é à toa que estamos na vida, no coração e na garagem dos brasileiros. O segredo? Construímos os carros mais inovadores, tornamos as tecnologias acessíve...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:12,470
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
VDL Van Hool Macedonia

VDL Van Hool Macedonia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Volkswagen do Brasil

Volkswagen do Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VDL Van Hool Macedonia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Volkswagen do Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - VDL Van Hool Macedonia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VDL Van Hool Macedonia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Volkswagen do Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Volkswagen do Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
VDL Van Hool Macedonia

VDL Van Hool Macedonia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Volkswagen do Brasil

Volkswagen do Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia company and Volkswagen do Brasil company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia company and Volkswagen do Brasil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia company and Volkswagen do Brasil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia company and Volkswagen do Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia company and Volkswagen do Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia company and Volkswagen do Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia company and Volkswagen do Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia company and Volkswagen do Brasil company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia company and Volkswagen do Brasil company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia company and Volkswagen do Brasil company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia company and Volkswagen do Brasil company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia and Volkswagen do Brasil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia and Volkswagen do Brasil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - VDL Van Hool Macedonia or Volkswagen do Brasil ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - VDL Van Hool Macedonia or Volkswagen do Brasil ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia and Volkswagen do Brasil, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between VDL Van Hool Macedonia and Volkswagen do Brasil, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2