Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Van HeusenVan Heusen
VS
J.CrewJ.Crew
Van Heusen

Van Heusen

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
759/1000Fair

Van Heusen is a premium lifestyle brand for men, women and youth. The brand caters to every aspect of an individual’s clothing needs, be it corporate, casual, club or ceremonial.

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
J.Crew

J.Crew

225 Liberty St, New York, New York, US, 10281

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.jcrew.com/
783/1000Fair

Since 1983, we’ve been designing pieces that feel both familiar and refreshingly new, crafted with unbeatable quality and distinctive point of view...it’s no wonder we’ve been in your closet for four decades and counting. Today, we continue to do the classics our way, ...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:15,292
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Van Heusen

Van Heusen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
J.Crew

J.Crew

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Van Heusen in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J.Crew in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Van Heusen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Van Heusen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - J.Crew (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J.Crew cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Van Heusen

Van Heusen

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
J.Crew

J.Crew

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
J-C1056072525

FAQ

Between Van Heusen company and J.Crew company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Van Heusen company and J.Crew company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Van Heusen company and J.Crew company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Van Heusen company and J.Crew company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Van Heusen company and J.Crew company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Van Heusen company and J.Crew company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Van Heusen company and J.Crew company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Van Heusen company and J.Crew company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Van Heusen company and J.Crew company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Van Heusen company and J.Crew company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Van Heusen company and J.Crew company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Van Heusen and J.Crew, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Van Heusen and J.Crew, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Van Heusen or J.Crew ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Van Heusen or J.Crew ?
Between Van Heusen and J.Crew, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Van Heusen and J.Crew, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1