Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Van Cleef & ArpelsVan Cleef & Arpels
VS
Louis VuittonLouis Vuitton
Van Cleef & Arpels

Van Cleef & Arpels

75001, Place Vendôme, Paris, Île-de-France, 75001, FR

Last Update: 21/01/2026

View Profile
783/1000Fair

Van Cleef & Arpels was born in Paris’ place Vendôme in 1906, following Alfred Van Cleef’s marriage to Estelle Arpels in 1895. For over a century, their names have graced some of the finest High Jewelry ever created. Over the years, the Maison has remained faithful to a...

NAICS:4483
NAICS Definition:Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores
Employees:3,476
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Louis Vuitton

Louis Vuitton

2 Rue du Pont Neuf, Paris, 75001, FR

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.louisvuitton.com
584/1000Very Poor

For more than 150 years, men and women at Louis Vuitton have shared the same spirit of excellence and passion, reaffirming their expertise every day, the world over. With us, every career is a journey, filled with excitement and challenge, desire and daring. There is no...

NAICS:4483
NAICS Definition:Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores
Employees:26,974
Subsidiaries:75
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Van Cleef & Arpels

Van Cleef & Arpels

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Louis Vuitton

Louis Vuitton

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Van Cleef & Arpels in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)

Louis Vuitton has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Van Cleef & Arpels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Van Cleef & Arpels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Louis Vuitton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Louis Vuitton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Van Cleef & Arpels

Van Cleef & Arpels

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Louis Vuitton

Louis Vuitton

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TIFLVMCHR1770865579
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOU0265102090625
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674

FAQ

Between Van Cleef & Arpels company and Louis Vuitton company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels company and Louis Vuitton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels company and Louis Vuitton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels company and Louis Vuitton company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels company and Louis Vuitton company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels company and Louis Vuitton company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels company and Louis Vuitton company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels company and Louis Vuitton company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels company and Louis Vuitton company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels company and Louis Vuitton company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels company and Louis Vuitton company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels and Louis Vuitton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels and Louis Vuitton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Van Cleef & Arpels or Louis Vuitton ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Van Cleef & Arpels or Louis Vuitton ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels and Louis Vuitton, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Van Cleef & Arpels and Louis Vuitton, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-77648
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Glance through 32.0.0, the /v2/tasks API accepts type=import tasks that bypass import_filtering_opts, allowing an admin to fetch internal URLs from the Glance service network (aka SSRF), as long as https:// or http:// is used. This API has been available only to admins since Xena, and it has been deprecated for several releases.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.7
CVE-2026-77647
SUMMARY

SPIP before 4.4.20 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, as exploited in the wild in August 2026. This is related to incorrect identification of <?php blocks, and var_export's mishandling of certain cases such as presence of a '<' character.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-77113
SUMMARY

Path traversal in apport-unpack in Canonical Apport before 2.36.0, 2.34.2, and 2.28.4 on Linux allows an attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the executing user via an attacker controlled key names in crash report files.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-77646
SUMMARY

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill PDMLink and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Red
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-77645
SUMMARY

A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Red
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA