Louis Vuitton
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
louis-vuitton
Website:
Employees number:
25,945
Number of followers:
3,103,472
NAICS:
4483
Industry Type:
Homepage:
louisvuitton.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
LOU_5764444
Scan Status:
In-progress
Louis Vuitton Company CyberSecurity Posture
louisvuitton.com
For more than 150 years, men and women at Louis Vuitton have shared the same spirit of excellence and passion, reaffirming their expertise every day, the world over. With us, every career is a journey, filled with excitement and challenge, desire and daring. There is no better way to reveal your potential. Explore, develop, innovate, create... Every journey is unique. Today, Louis Vuitton invites you to discover your own.
Louis Vuitton A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Louis Vuitton Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
Louis Vuitton
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Louis Vuitton Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Louis Vuitton
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Louis Vuitton Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
Louis Vuitton
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: In July 2025, luxury fashion brand **Louis Vuitton** confirmed a **data breach** affecting thousands of its customers. The incident exposed highly sensitive personal information, including **names, contact details, and purchase histories**. While the exact scale of the breach remains undisclosed, the leaked data—particularly transaction records and customer profiles—poses severe risks. Criminals could exploit this information for **targeted phishing attacks, identity theft, or financial fraud**, especially given the brand’s high-net-worth clientele. The breach underscores vulnerabilities in **third-party data-sharing practices**, as retailers often store and share customer data with minimal oversight. Though no ransomware was involved, the exposure of **personal and financial details** linked to luxury purchases heightens the potential for **reputation damage, fraudulent activity, and long-term trust erosion**. The breach aligns with broader trends in 2025, where stolen account data—including 6.8 million records earlier in the year—fueled underground markets for identity exploitation.
Louis Vuitton Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Louis Vuitton
Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Average (This Year)
Louis Vuitton has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Louis Vuitton has 28.21% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types Louis Vuitton vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)
Louis Vuitton reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — Louis Vuitton (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Louis Vuitton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Louis Vuitton Company Subsidiaries
For more than 150 years, men and women at Louis Vuitton have shared the same spirit of excellence and passion, reaffirming their expertise every day, the world over. With us, every career is a journey, filled with excitement and challenge, desire and daring. There is no better way to reveal your potential. Explore, develop, innovate, create... Every journey is unique. Today, Louis Vuitton invites you to discover your own.
Loading...
Louis Vuitton Similar Companies
Swatch Group
Swatch Group is the world's number one manufacturer of finished watches. With its 16 watch brands, the Group is present in all price segments, and is also active in the manufacture and sale of jewelry, watch movements and components. Swatch Group unites, among other companies, the following watch b
Pandora is the world’s largest jewellery brand. The company designs, manufactures and markets hand-finished jewellery made from high-quality materials at affordable prices Pandora jewellery is sold in more than 100 countries through more than 6,500 points of sale, including more than 2,500 concept s
Swatch Group
The Swatch Group Ltd is an international group active in the manufacture and sale of finished watches, jewelry, watch movements and components. Swatch Group supplies nearly all components required for the watches sold by its 16 watch and jewelry brands as well as by its two retail brands, Tourbillon
Prada Group
The Prada Group is a global leader in the luxury industry and a pioneer in its unconventional dialogue with contemporary society across diverse cultural spheres. Home to prestigious brands as Prada, Miu Miu, Church’s, Car Shoe, Marchesi 1824 and Luna Rossa, the Group remains committed to enhancing
At Richemont, we craft the future. Our unique portfolio includes prestigious Maisons distinguished by their craftsmanship and creativity. Richemont’s ambition is to nurture its Maisons and businesses and enable them to grow and prosper in a responsible, sustainable manner over the long term. Riche
Chanel is a private company and world leader in creating, manufacturing and distributing luxury products, including Ready-to-Wear, Accessories, Fragrances, Makeup, Skincare, Jewellery and Watches. Founded by Gabrielle Chanel in 1910, the House remains dedicated to exceptional craftsmanship and offer
Gucci
Founded in Florence, Italy in 1921, Gucci is one of the world’s leading luxury brands. Following the House’s centenary, Gucci forges ahead continuing to redefine fashion and luxury while celebrating creativity, Italian craftsmanship, and innovation. Gucci is part of the global luxury group Kering,
Hermès
A creator, artisan and seller of high-quality objects since 1837, Hermès is an independent, family-owned French house that employs more than 16,600 people worldwide. Driven by its permanent entrepreneurial spirit and consistently high standards, Hermès cultivates the freedom and autonomy of each ind
LVMH is the world leader in luxury. A family group founded in 1987 and headed by Chairman and CEO Bernard Arnault, LVMH is now home to 75 iconic Maisons, which embody a distinctive art de vivre blending heritage and modernity. With reported sales of 86.2 billion euros in 2023 and 6000 stores around
.png)
Louis Vuitton CyberSecurity News
December 11, 2025 07:01 AM
2025 in cybersecurity: Major incidents of the year
SiliconRepublic.com has kept an ear to the ground, covering cybersecurity stories as they evolve. Here are some of the biggest incidents.
November 14, 2025 08:00 AM
The retail sector needs a cybersecurity talent incubator
Retailers are facing an unprecedented cybersecurity crisis, with giants like Louis Vuitton and Dior losing millions to data breaches.
October 16, 2025 10:18 AM
Mango Data Breach Confirms Exposure Of Limited Customer Info
Spanish fashion retailer Mango has confirmed a data breach after one of its external marketing service providers suffered unauthorized access to limited...
September 25, 2025 07:00 AM
What the Latest Cyber Attacks Mean for Luxury Supply Chains
A ransomware attack on Gucci, Balenciaga and McQueen exposes customer data and highlights growing cybersecurity gaps in luxury retail supply...
September 19, 2025 07:00 AM
Louis Vuitton data breach could lead to potential class action lawsuits
Who: Louis Vuitton is addressing a cybersecurity incident affecting over 419,000 customers. Why: An unauthorized party accessed a database...
September 18, 2025 07:00 AM
What Kering’s Cyber Attack Teaches Industries About AI
The cyber attack exposing 7.4 million customer's data across Kering's Gucci, Balenciaga and Alexander McQueen shows how AI can both help and...
September 17, 2025 07:00 AM
AI-Driven Hack Hits Gucci, Balenciaga and McQueen's Data
Cyber attackers have stolen customer details from Gucci, Balenciaga and Alexander McQueen, highlighting major cybersecurity flaws in retail...
September 16, 2025 07:00 AM
A Rare and Audacious Louis Vuitton Collection
CREATIVITY REIGNS IN STEVEN WALBROEHL'S DIVERSE ASSEMBLAGE OF LIMITED-EDITION BAGS, LUGGAGE, SKATEBOARDS, AND ONE INNOVATIVE, NFT-EQUIPPED...
September 12, 2025 07:00 AM
CAGs of 29 nations pledge focus on cybersecurity audits, adopt AI and ML
India News: A global gathering of audit chiefs in Hyderabad, including China, concluded with a focus on cybersecurity and IoT-based remote...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Louis Vuitton CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Louis Vuitton
The official website of Louis Vuitton is http://www.louisvuitton.com.
Louis Vuitton’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Louis Vuitton’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 779, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Louis Vuitton’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Louis Vuitton currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Louis Vuitton have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Louis Vuitton is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Louis Vuitton have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Louis Vuitton does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Louis Vuitton comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Louis Vuitton is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Louis Vuitton have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Louis Vuitton does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Louis Vuitton comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Louis Vuitton is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Louis Vuitton have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Louis Vuitton is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Louis Vuitton
Louis Vuitton operates primarily in the Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry industry.
Number of Employees at Louis Vuitton
Louis Vuitton employs approximately 25,945 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Louis Vuitton
Louis Vuitton presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Louis Vuitton’s LinkedIn Followers
Louis Vuitton’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 3,103,472 followers.
NAICS Classification of Louis Vuitton
Louis Vuitton is classified under the NAICS code 4483, which corresponds to Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores.
Louis Vuitton’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Louis Vuitton does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Louis Vuitton’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Louis Vuitton maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/louis-vuitton.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Louis Vuitton
As of December 24, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Louis Vuitton has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Louis Vuitton has an estimated 1,392 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Louis Vuitton ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
How does Louis Vuitton detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an communication strategy with public disclosure (july 2025)..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Louis Vuitton Data Breach (July 2025)
Description: Luxury fashion brand Louis Vuitton confirmed a data breach in July 2025 that exposed personal information of thousands of customers, including names, contact details, and purchase histories. The breach highlights risks associated with long-term data retention, third-party data-sharing vulnerabilities, and the criminal marketplace for stolen data. Attackers may combine exposed purchase histories and addresses with phishing tactics (enhanced by AI) to build detailed identity profiles for fraud, identity theft, or targeted attacks. The incident underscores broader concerns about data broker practices, regulatory compliance (e.g., GDPR, CCPA), and consumer rights to data deletion.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-07
Type: Data Breach
Vulnerability Exploited: Inadequate Third-Party VettingLong-Term Data RetentionLack of Data Minimization
Motivation: Financial GainFraud EnablementIdentity TheftData Monetization (Dark Web Sales)
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Data Compromised: Names, Contact details, Purchase histories, Potential addresses
Brand Reputation Impact: High (Luxury brand trust erosion, privacy concerns)
Legal Liabilities: Potential GDPR/CCPA ViolationsRegulatory Scrutiny
Identity Theft Risk: High (Exposed data enables profiling for phishing/AI-driven scams)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Identifiable Information (Pii), Transaction Histories and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Entity Name: Louis Vuitton
Entity Type: Luxury Retailer
Industry: Fashion & Apparel
Location: Global (HQ: Paris, France)
Customers Affected: Thousands
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Communication Strategy: Public Disclosure (July 2025)
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Type of Data Compromised: Personal identifiable information (pii), Transaction histories
Number of Records Exposed: Thousands
Sensitivity of Data: High (Enables identity profiling, fraud, and targeted phishing)
Data Exfiltration: Likely (Data sold on dark web markets)
Personally Identifiable Information: NamesContact DetailsPurchase Histories
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Regulations Violated: Potential GDPR (EU), Potential CCPA (California, USA),
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Lessons Learned: Long-term data retention increases breach risks; implement data minimization strategies., Third-party data-sharing practices require rigorous vetting and accountability controls., Consumer demand for privacy (e.g., GDPR/CCPA requests) is rising; proactive data deletion processes are critical., AI-enhanced phishing leverages breached data (e.g., purchase histories) for hyper-targeted attacks., Data brokers exacerbate risks by monetizing sensitive information (e.g., location tracking).
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Recommendations: Adopt **data minimization** principles: Retain customer data only as long as legally required., Enhance **third-party risk management**: Audit data-sharing partners for security/compliance., Implement **automated data deletion** workflows to comply with GDPR/CCPA requests efficiently., Educate customers on **privacy controls**: Promote account settings for data deletion, marketing opt-outs, and payment method removal., Monitor **dark web markets** for exposed data and proactively notify affected individuals., Invest in **AI-driven threat detection** to counter phishing campaigns using breached data., Advocate for **strengthened regulations** on data brokers to limit unauthorized data sales.Adopt **data minimization** principles: Retain customer data only as long as legally required., Enhance **third-party risk management**: Audit data-sharing partners for security/compliance., Implement **automated data deletion** workflows to comply with GDPR/CCPA requests efficiently., Educate customers on **privacy controls**: Promote account settings for data deletion, marketing opt-outs, and payment method removal., Monitor **dark web markets** for exposed data and proactively notify affected individuals., Invest in **AI-driven threat detection** to counter phishing campaigns using breached data., Advocate for **strengthened regulations** on data brokers to limit unauthorized data sales.Adopt **data minimization** principles: Retain customer data only as long as legally required., Enhance **third-party risk management**: Audit data-sharing partners for security/compliance., Implement **automated data deletion** workflows to comply with GDPR/CCPA requests efficiently., Educate customers on **privacy controls**: Promote account settings for data deletion, marketing opt-outs, and payment method removal., Monitor **dark web markets** for exposed data and proactively notify affected individuals., Invest in **AI-driven threat detection** to counter phishing campaigns using breached data., Advocate for **strengthened regulations** on data brokers to limit unauthorized data sales.Adopt **data minimization** principles: Retain customer data only as long as legally required., Enhance **third-party risk management**: Audit data-sharing partners for security/compliance., Implement **automated data deletion** workflows to comply with GDPR/CCPA requests efficiently., Educate customers on **privacy controls**: Promote account settings for data deletion, marketing opt-outs, and payment method removal., Monitor **dark web markets** for exposed data and proactively notify affected individuals., Invest in **AI-driven threat detection** to counter phishing campaigns using breached data., Advocate for **strengthened regulations** on data brokers to limit unauthorized data sales.Adopt **data minimization** principles: Retain customer data only as long as legally required., Enhance **third-party risk management**: Audit data-sharing partners for security/compliance., Implement **automated data deletion** workflows to comply with GDPR/CCPA requests efficiently., Educate customers on **privacy controls**: Promote account settings for data deletion, marketing opt-outs, and payment method removal., Monitor **dark web markets** for exposed data and proactively notify affected individuals., Invest in **AI-driven threat detection** to counter phishing campaigns using breached data., Advocate for **strengthened regulations** on data brokers to limit unauthorized data sales.Adopt **data minimization** principles: Retain customer data only as long as legally required., Enhance **third-party risk management**: Audit data-sharing partners for security/compliance., Implement **automated data deletion** workflows to comply with GDPR/CCPA requests efficiently., Educate customers on **privacy controls**: Promote account settings for data deletion, marketing opt-outs, and payment method removal., Monitor **dark web markets** for exposed data and proactively notify affected individuals., Invest in **AI-driven threat detection** to counter phishing campaigns using breached data., Advocate for **strengthened regulations** on data brokers to limit unauthorized data sales.Adopt **data minimization** principles: Retain customer data only as long as legally required., Enhance **third-party risk management**: Audit data-sharing partners for security/compliance., Implement **automated data deletion** workflows to comply with GDPR/CCPA requests efficiently., Educate customers on **privacy controls**: Promote account settings for data deletion, marketing opt-outs, and payment method removal., Monitor **dark web markets** for exposed data and proactively notify affected individuals., Invest in **AI-driven threat detection** to counter phishing campaigns using breached data., Advocate for **strengthened regulations** on data brokers to limit unauthorized data sales.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Long-term data retention increases breach risks; implement data minimization strategies.,Third-party data-sharing practices require rigorous vetting and accountability controls.,Consumer demand for privacy (e.g., GDPR/CCPA requests) is rising; proactive data deletion processes are critical.,AI-enhanced phishing leverages breached data (e.g., purchase histories) for hyper-targeted attacks.,Data brokers exacerbate risks by monetizing sensitive information (e.g., location tracking).
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Source: LOKKER (Ian Cohen, CEO)
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Source: DataGrail (2025 Data Deletion Report)
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Source: UBC Sauder School of Business (Dr. Joy Wu)
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Source: SEC Employee Tracking Study (Location Data Brokers)
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: LOKKER (Ian Cohen, CEO), and Source: DataGrail (2025 Data Deletion Report), and Source: UBC Sauder School of Business (Dr. Joy Wu), and Source: SEC Employee Tracking Study (Location Data Brokers).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Investigation Status: Disclosed (July 2025); details limited
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Disclosure (July 2025).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Customer Advisories: Review/account privacy settings for data deletion options.Submit formal data deletion requests (cite GDPR/CCPA if applicable).Remove saved payment methods/addresses to limit exposure.Monitor financial accounts for fraudulent activity.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Review/Account Privacy Settings For Data Deletion Options., Submit Formal Data Deletion Requests (Cite Gdpr/Ccpa If Applicable)., Remove Saved Payment Methods/Addresses To Limit Exposure., Monitor Financial Accounts For Fraudulent Activity. and .
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
High Value Targets: High-Net-Worth Individuals (Via Purchase Histories),
Data Sold on Dark Web: High-Net-Worth Individuals (Via Purchase Histories),
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach LOU0265102090625
Root Causes: Over-Retention Of Customer Data Without Clear Deletion Policies., Insufficient Oversight Of Third-Party Data-Sharing Ecosystems., Lack Of Proactive Monitoring For Dark Web Data Leaks.,
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-07.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Names, Contact Details, Purchase Histories, Potential Addresses and .
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Purchase Histories, Contact Details, Potential Addresses and Names.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 0.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Data brokers exacerbate risks by monetizing sensitive information (e.g., location tracking).
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Invest in **AI-driven threat detection** to counter phishing campaigns using breached data., Enhance **third-party risk management**: Audit data-sharing partners for security/compliance., Monitor **dark web markets** for exposed data and proactively notify affected individuals., Educate customers on **privacy controls**: Promote account settings for data deletion, marketing opt-outs, and payment method removal., Advocate for **strengthened regulations** on data brokers to limit unauthorized data sales., Adopt **data minimization** principles: Retain customer data only as long as legally required. and Implement **automated data deletion** workflows to comply with GDPR/CCPA requests efficiently..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are LOKKER (Ian Cohen, CEO), SEC Employee Tracking Study (Location Data Brokers), DataGrail (2025 Data Deletion Report) and UBC Sauder School of Business (Dr. Joy Wu).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Disclosed (July 2025); details limited.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Review/account privacy settings for data deletion options.Submit formal data deletion requests (cite GDPR/CCPA if applicable).Remove saved payment methods/addresses to limit exposure.Monitor financial accounts for fraudulent activity.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description
KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
- https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/commit/2bdcb24d7d6d5886e0214ed504b63a6dc5488779
- https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/commit/bf2f0783634efed2663d1b187dc55461ee1f987a
- https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/releases/tag/1.6.13
- https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/releases/tag/1.7.14
- https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/releases/tag/1.8.15
- https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/releases/tag/1.9.2
- https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/security/advisories/GHSA-rchf-xwx2-hm93
Description
Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description
An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=louis-vuitton' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
