Comparison Overview
Louis Vuitton

Louis Vuitton
2 Rue du Pont Neuf, Paris, 75001, FR
Last Update: 19/06/2026
For more than 150 years, men and women at Louis Vuitton have shared the same spirit of excellence and passion, reaffirming their expertise every day, the world over. With us, every career is a journey, filled with excitement and challenge, desire and daring. There is no...

Swatch Group
Seevorstadt 6, Biel, Berne, CH, 2502
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Swatch Group is the world's number one manufacturer of finished watches. With its 16 watch brands, the Group is present in all price segments, and is also active in the manufacture and sale of jewelry, watch movements and components. Swatch Group unites, among other co...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Louis Vuitton







Swatch Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)
Louis Vuitton has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Swatch Group in 2026.
Incident History - Louis Vuitton (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Louis Vuitton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Swatch Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Swatch Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Louis Vuitton

Swatch Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.