Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (UZCMIN1770216507)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of UzCERT's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts UzCERT Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the UzCERT breach identified under incident ID UZCMIN1770216507.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of UzCERT's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/uzcert, the number of followers: 110, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 18 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 752 and after the incident was 637 with a difference of -115 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on UzCERT and their customers.
On 03 February 2024, Uzbekistan Government disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Alleged Leak of Uzbek Citizen Data on Darknet Forums".
Reports surfaced suggesting that the personal data of Uzbek citizens may have been leaked from government systems and shared on darknet forums.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal data of up to 15 million individuals, with nearly Up to 15 million records at risk.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statements denying breaches and urging reliance on verified sources.
The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Public urged to rely on verified sources for updates.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating potential vulnerabilities in state information systems and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating government systems allegedly breached, no conclusive evidence. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating personal data of up to 15 million individuals allegedly leaked and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating high sensitivity of personal data compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating personal data allegedly leaked from government systems and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating records of up to 15 million individuals allegedly exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data allegedly shared on darknet forums and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating reports surfaced on social media and Reddit. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no conclusive evidence presented on breach extent and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential vulnerabilities in state information systems. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no unauthorized access detected (per Ministry of Internal Affairs) and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating ongoing investigation, no containment measures disclosed. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- UzCERT Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/uzcert/incident/UZCMIN1770216507
- UzCERT CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/uzcert
- UzCERT Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/uzcmin1770216507-uzbekistan-ministry-of-internal-affairs-uzbekistan-cybersecurity-center-uzbekistan-statistics-agency-breach-february-2026/
- UzCERT CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/uzcert/history
- UzCERT CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://timesca.com/uzbekistan-probes-alleged-personal-data-leak-from-state-information-systems/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf