Comparison Overview
Co-operative and Experiential Education at University of Waterloo
Co-operative and Experiential Education at University of Waterloo
200 University Ave W, Waterloo, N2L 3G1, CA
Last Update: 27/02/2026
Co-operative education is synonymous with the University of Waterloo. It’s one of the innovations that the University was founded on more than 60 years ago. Today, our incomparable co-operative education program is the reason 70% of incoming undergraduate students choos...
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Madrid, 28040, ES
Last Update: 01/04/2026
La Universidad Complutense de Madrid es una universidad pública de calidad al servicio de la sociedad. Sus estudiantes son el eje principal de su actividad por ello, la UCM apuesta por una formación integral y crítica del más alto nivel. Su oferta para el curso 2016...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Co-operative and Experiential Education at University of Waterloo
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Co-operative and Experiential Education at University of Waterloo in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Universidad Complutense de Madrid in 2026.
Incident History - Co-operative and Experiential Education at University of Waterloo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Co-operative and Experiential Education at University of Waterloo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Universidad Complutense de Madrid (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Co-operative and Experiential Education at University of Waterloo
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security vulnerability has been detected in adafap api-mcp up to 92b9a5d04acfec165c7d4ef852496593aa87be06. This affects the function customAxios of the file app/api/proxy/route.ts of the component Proxy API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A weakness has been identified in PhialsBasement KoboldCPP-MCP-Server 1.0.0. Affected by this issue is the function makeRequest of the file src/index.ts of the component BaseConfigSchema. Executing a manipulation of the argument apiUrl can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A security flaw has been discovered in Handwriting-OCR handwriting-ocr-mcp-server 0.1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fs.readFileSync of the file src/index.ts of the component upload_document. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in path traversal. Attacking locally is a requirement. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was identified in Nikolaibibo claude-comfyui-mcp 1.0.0. Affected is the function copyFileSync of the file src/tools/utils.ts of the component comfy_upload_image. Such manipulation of the argument image_path leads to path traversal. An attack has to be approached locally. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python's `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK's network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed.