Comparison Overview
U.S. Probation Office, Western District of North Carolina

U.S. Probation Office, Western District of North Carolina
200 S College St, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28202, US
Last Update: 24/12/2025
The Western District of North Carolina is about people at every level of our organization. We strive to build relationships and want all of our employees to feel valued as individuals. Our objective is to provide a cohesive working environment for our staff whereby id...

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
J. Edgar Hoover Building, Washington, 20535-0001, US
Last Update: 16/10/2026
This is the official Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) LinkedIn account and is used to build awareness of workplace culture, engagement opportunities, and the FBI mission. The FBI does not collect comments or messages through this account. The FBI is the premier ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

U.S. Probation Office, Western District of North Carolina







Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for U.S. Probation Office, Western District of North Carolina in 2026.
Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has 2841.18% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - U.S. Probation Office, Western District of North Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)
U.S. Probation Office, Western District of North Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

U.S. Probation Office, Western District of North Carolina

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.