Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U.S. District Court, Western District of North CarolinaU.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina
VS
United States CourtsUnited States Courts
U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina

U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina

401 W Trade St, Charlotte, 28202, US

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
758/1000Fair

NAICS:92211
NAICS Definition:Courts
Employees:29
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
United States Courts

United States Courts

Washington, 20002, US

Last Update: 29/09/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.uscourts.gov/
639/1000Poor

The U.S. Courts, located in courthouses across the nation, safeguard the constitutional rights and liberties of the public. Judges, court clerks, federal public defenders, law clerks, probation and pretrial services officers, technology specialists, human resources and ...

NAICS:92211
NAICS Definition:Courts
Employees:11,282
Subsidiaries:80
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina

U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
United States Courts

United States Courts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Administration of Justice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Administration of Justice Industry Avg (This Year)

United States Courts has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - United States Courts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Courts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina

U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
United States Courts

United States Courts

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-1790649576
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALA1788460208
🔒 Incident : Breach
US-1790475871

FAQ

Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina company and United States Courts company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina company and United States Courts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina company and United States Courts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina company and United States Courts company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina company and United States Courts company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina company and United States Courts company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina company and United States Courts company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina company and United States Courts company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina company and United States Courts company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina company and United States Courts company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina company and United States Courts company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina and United States Courts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina and United States Courts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina or United States Courts ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina or United States Courts ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina and United States Courts, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina and United States Courts, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-108773
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in erzhongxmu JEEWMS up to 2026.09.27-W39. Impacted is the function docheck of the file src/main/java/com/zzjee/wm/controller/WmOmNoticeHController.java. Performing a manipulation of the argument goodscode results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108772
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in bleenco abstruse up to 2.1.0. This issue affects the function filepath.Join of the file server/api/worker/download_cache.go of the component Cache Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument File leads to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-108770
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Appwrite up to 2.3.0. This vulnerability affects the function PublicHostname of the file src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Avatars/Http/Screenshots/Get.php of the component Browser Screenshot Service. This manipulation of the argument url causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 2.4.0 is able to resolve this issue. Patch name: 393255e7302ae5503331d45802e2eee01c6a47fe. You should upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-108978
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Samsung Opensource rlottie allows Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables. This issue affects rlottie: e57b094f03c39a751a1fded6f7d6c13f1ed95ec9.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-108769
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.2.0. This affects an unknown part of the file Markdown.tsx of the component Markdown Rendering. The manipulation results in denial of service. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8