Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of CaliforniaU.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California
VS
Metropolitan PoliceMetropolitan Police
U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California

U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California

101 W Broadway, San Diego, California, 92101, US

Last Update: 23/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.casp.uscourts.gov
759/1000Fair

The U.S. Probation Office for the Southern District of California serves the Court by investigating and supervising individuals convicted of federal crimes. Some examples of federal crimes include interstate drug crimes, tax evasion, major frauds, cybercrimes, and immi...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:15
Subsidiaries:75
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Metropolitan Police

Metropolitan Police

Victoria Embankment, Westminster, London, GB, SW1A 2JL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.met.police.uk
615/1000Poor

The Metropolitan Police Service is famed around the world and has a unique place in the history of policing. Our headquarters at New Scotland Yard - and its iconic revolving sign - has provided the backdrop to some of the most high profile and complex law enforcement ...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:19,573
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California

U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Metropolitan Police

Metropolitan Police

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

Metropolitan Police has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Metropolitan Police (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metropolitan Police cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California

U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Metropolitan Police

Metropolitan Police

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MET1774599822
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MET102117923
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
MET9516923

FAQ

Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California company and Metropolitan Police company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California company and Metropolitan Police company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California company and Metropolitan Police company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California company and Metropolitan Police company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California company and Metropolitan Police company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California company and Metropolitan Police company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California company and Metropolitan Police company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California company and Metropolitan Police company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California company and Metropolitan Police company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California company and Metropolitan Police company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California company and Metropolitan Police company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California and Metropolitan Police, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California and Metropolitan Police, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California or Metropolitan Police ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California or Metropolitan Police ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California and Metropolitan Police, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U.S. Probation Office, Southern District of California and Metropolitan Police, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-50044
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an inadequate encryption strength vulnerability which could allow an attacker to steal admin credentials via weak hash or a pass-the-hash attack.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-44955
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could allow for asset discovery by unauthenticated users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42933
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an unintended proxy or intermediary vulnerability which could allow an attacker to use an active proxy, which would bypass OT segmentation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-40430
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE Versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have a plaintext storage of a password vulnerability that could expose cleartext credentials through the API.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-28698
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could expose the underlying host/share filesystem.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9