What is the official website of UPL ?

The official website of UPL is http://www.upl-ltd.com.

What is UPL's cybersecurity risk score?

UPL has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 774 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has UPL experienced?

According to Rankiteo, UPL currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has UPL been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, UPL has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does UPL have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, UPL is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does UPL have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, UPL does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does UPL comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, UPL is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does UPL have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, UPL does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does UPL comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, UPL is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does UPL have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,UPL is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does UPL operate in ?

UPL operates primarily in the Farming industry.

How many employees does UPL have ?

UPL employs approximately 13,010 people worldwide.

Does UPL own any subsidiaries ?

UPL presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does UPL have ?

UPL's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 644,430 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for UPL ?

UPL is classified under the NAICS code 111, which corresponds to Crop Production.

Does UPL have a Crunchbase profile ?

Yes, UPL has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/upl-limited-inr2.

Does UPL have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, UPL maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/upl-ltd.

How many cybersecurity incidents has UPL experienced ?

As of August 11, 2026, Rankiteo reports that UPL has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does UPL have ?

UPL has an estimated 2,867 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

UPL

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

774

/1000

Fair

799

/1000

Fair

UPL Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

upl-ltd.com

cb in

Add Your Compliance Badge

UPL Ltd. (NSE: UPL & BSE: 512070) is a global provider of sustainable agriculture products & solutions, with annual revenue exceeding $5 billion. As one of the top 5 agriculture solutions companies worldwide, our robust portfolio consists of biologicals and traditional crop protection solutions with more than 13,600 registrations. With a presence in more than 130 countries and more than 10,000 colleagues globally, we reach more than 90% of the world’s food basket. For more information about our integrated portfolio of solutions across the food value chain including seeds, post-harvest, as well as physical and digital services, please visit upl-ltd.com.

UPL A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

UPL

UPL CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

UPL Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for UPL

Incidents vs Farming Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UPL in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UPL in 2026.

Incident Types UPL vs Farming Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UPL in 2026.

Incident History - UPL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

UPL Subsidiaries

Parent Company

UPL

Farming

Website: http://www.upl-ltd.com

Company Size: 10,001+ employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

UPL Similar Companies

Corteva Agriscience

cb corteva.com

Corteva Agriscience combines industry-leading innovations, high-touch customer engagement and operational execution to profitably deliver solutions for the world's most pressing agriculture challenges. Corteva generates advantaged market preference through its unique distribution strategy, together with its balanced and globally diverse mix of seed, crop protection, biologicals, and digital products and services. With some of the most recognized brands in agriculture and a technology pipeline well positioned to drive growth, the company is committed to maximizing productivity for farmers, while working with stakeholders throughout the food system as it fulfills its promise to enrich the lives of those who produce and those who consume, ensuring progress for generations to come.

Yara International

yara.com

Yara's mission is to responsibly feed the world and protect the planet. We pursue a strategy of sustainable value growth through reducing emissions from crop nutrition production and developing low-emission energy solutions. Yara’s ambition is focused on growing a nature-positive food future that creates value for our customers, shareholders and society at large and delivers a more sustainable food value chain. To drive the green shift in fertilizer production, shipping, and other energy intensive industries, Yara will produce ammonia with significantly lower emissions. We provide digital tools for precision farming and work closely with partners at all levels of the food value chain to share knowledge and promote more efficient and sustainable solutions. Founded in 1905 to solve the emerging famine in Europe, Yara has established a unique position as the industry’s only global crop nutrition company. With 18,000 employees and operations in more than 60 countries, sustainability is an integral part of our business model. In 2024, Yara reported revenues of USD 13.9 billion.

Syngenta Group

cb syngentagroup.com

To help feed 10 billion people while reducing emissions and improve biodiversity. This is our mission as the global agriculture technology leader. With over 56,000 employees in more than 90 countries and hundreds of thousands of agricultural partners worldwide, we are committed to transforming agriculture into a more sustainable, productive system to benefit society and the planet. We invite you to join us in this collective mission to feed the world while respecting the earth.

Syngenta

syngenta.com

Syngenta is one of the world’s leading agriculture companies. Our ambition is to help safely feed the world while taking care of the planet. We aim to improve the sustainability, quality and safety of agriculture with world class science and innovative crop solutions. Our technologies enable millions of farmers around the world to make better use of limited agricultural resources. Syngenta is part of Syngenta Group with 53,000 people in more than 100 countries and is working to transform how crops are grown. Through partnerships, collaboration and The Good Growth Plan we are committed to accelerating innovation for farmers and nature, striving for carbon neutral agriculture, helping people stay safe and healthy and partnering for impact. To learn more visit www.syngenta.com and www.goodgrowthplan.com. Follow us on Twitter at www.twitter.com/Syngenta.

Loading…

NEWS

UPL CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

February 23, 2026 08:00 AM

Stocks To Watch Today: UPL, IDFC First Bank, RailTel | 23 Feb

Stocks to Watch Today include UPL restructuring, IDFC First Bank fraud probe, RailTel order win and Bharti Airtel cyber initiative on 23...

Read Article

February 10, 2026 08:00 AM

Indian NSA Ajit Doval visits Canada

Our Bureau. Ottawa. India and Canada have agreed to establish security and law-enforcement liaison officers during a meeting with National...

Read Article

January 11, 2026 08:00 AM

Pulkit Desai makes history as Mayor of Parsippany, New Jersey

Our Bureau. Parsippany, NJ. In a milestone moment for the local community, Pulkit Desai, an Indian-American U.S. Marine Corps veteran and a...

Read Article

November 08, 2025 08:00 AM

UPL launches global ‘#AFarmerCan’ campaign ahead of COP30

Through '#AFarmerCan', UPL strengthens its global commitment to empowering farmers for a sustainable future.

Read Article

April 23, 2024 07:00 AM

Dinesh Kumar Shrimali joins Tata Steel Ltd. as CISO and DPO

Shrimali assumes dual roles as Chief Information Security Officer and Data Protection Officer at Tata Steel Ltd. and will lead Tata Steel's...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8718

SUMMARY

tls_opt_dtls_peer_connection_id_value_get() in subsys/net/lib/sockets/sockets_tls.c, which handles getsockopt(SOL_TLS, TLS_DTLS_PEER_CID_VALUE), passed the caller-supplied optval directly to mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() without verifying the buffer was at least MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX (default 32) bytes. mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() copies the peer-negotiated DTLS Connection ID (length 1..MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX) into that buffer without a destination-size parameter, so a caller-supplied optlen smaller than the CID causes a write of up to 31 bytes past the buffer end. In CONFIG_USERSPACE builds the getsockopt syscall verifier (z_vrfy_zsock_getsockopt) bounce-buffers the user's optval into a kernel allocation of exactly optlen bytes (k_usermode_alloc_from_copy -> z_thread_malloc), so an unprivileged user thread that passes a small optlen on a connected DTLS socket with Connection ID enabled induces a kernel-heap buffer overflow, with the overflowing content being the remote peer's CID. The defect requires CONFIG_MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID, an established DTLS session with a negotiated peer CID, and (for the kernel-crossing case) CONFIG_USERSPACE. Introduced when the TLS_DTLS_CID option was added (v3.5.0). The fix rejects callers whose optlen is below MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX with -EINVAL.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.8

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48161

SUMMARY

react18-use is a React 19 use hook shim. Between 2026-05-19 01:07:01 and 2026-05-19 15:20:43, the default branch contained malicious commits 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 through 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 that executed remote attacker-controlled code on developer machines during `npm install`. The commits were removed by force-push, but local clones, forks, and direct-SHA URLs may still contain them, and `npm install` against an affected checkout will still execute the code today. The package was not published to npm. `src/install.js` was added and wired into the `postinstall` script. It fetched a JavaScript payload from an attacker-controlled HTTPS endpoint (configurable via an environment variable), disabled TLS verification, and evaluated the response as code with `require` available. Execution was deliberately skipped on CI and cloud/serverless environments, targeting developer workstations. The second-stage payload was attacker-hosted and cannot be reconstructed. Assume full compromise of anything reachable from a Node process with the user's permissions. Those who ran `npm install` against an affected checkout on a developer machine on or after 2026-05-19 01:07:01 should treat the machine as compromised, rotate every credential the machine could reach, audit account activity since 2026-05-19 01:07:01, and clean local clones.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/dai-shi/react18-use/security/advisories/GHSA-32xh-vg5f-64fm

CVE-2026-11812

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub management subsystem (subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c) drives every update operation through a single file-scope ctx structure that holds the CoAP block context, payload buffer, status code, socket, and a one-element poll-fd array fds[1]. Access to ctx was not serialized, and prepare_fds() wrote ctx.fds[ctx.nfds] and incremented ctx.nfds with no bounds check. Two independent paths mutate ctx concurrently: the background autohandler running on the system workqueue, and user-triggered operations reached through the updatehub run shell command, direct API calls, or — since the operations are exposed as syscalls — userspace threads. When a second flow enters prepare_fds() while ctx.nfds is already 1, the write lands one element past the array; by struct layout it overlaps the adjacent ctx.sock/ctx.nfds members. More broadly, the unsynchronized sharing lets two flows interleave connection setup and teardown, double-closing a socket descriptor or scribbling the shared buffers. The result is corruption of the update subsystem's internal state and denial of service of the firmware-update path; the out-of-bounds write is contained within the ctx structure and there is no demonstrated path to memory outside it or to code execution. Triggering requires a local actor able to invoke update operations (or, with CONFIG_USERSPACE, an unprivileged userspace thread) and to win a timing race against the background handler; remote peers cannot control the race timing. The fix serializes the entry points with a mutex and adds a bounds check to prepare_fds().

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-11811

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub over-the-air update client's start_coap_client() in subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c leaks the CoAP/DTLS socket descriptor on its connection-setup failure paths. The shared error: cleanup gated socket closing on a ret > 0 flag, but ret was set to -1 immediately after the socket was created, so when zsock_setsockopt() (DTLS) or zsock_connect() subsequently failed the gate was false and cleanup_connection() was never called. The open descriptor in the global ctx.sock was then overwritten by the next attempt, permanently leaking it from the socket / net_context pool until reboot. The failing setup path is reached every time the OTA client tries to contact the UpdateHub server and the connection cannot be established — driven automatically by the periodic autohandler() poll (and on demand via the updatehub_probe()/updatehub_update() API or the updatehub run shell command). The DTLS handshake/connect outcome is influenceable by a network or on-path attacker who drops, resets, or otherwise disrupts traffic to the server, and also fails naturally whenever the server is unreachable. Each failed attempt permanently leaks one descriptor; once the shared socket pool is exhausted, networking degrades device-wide until the device is rebooted, a denial-of-service condition. Severity is low because the leak rate is bounded by the configured OTA poll interval (default once per 24 hours), the effect is gradual and recovered by reboot, and only builds with the UpdateHub client enabled are affected. There is no memory-corruption, information-disclosure, or authentication impact.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2025-30241

SUMMARY

Certain web interface components in affected TP-Link Aginet devices do not validate and sanitize user-supplied input properly before passing it to system-level command execution functions. An authenticated adjacent attacker may inject specially crafted input to execute arbitrary operation system commands with elevated privileges. Successful exploitation may allow execution of arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full device compromise.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5239/

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…