What is the official website of UPC KU Leuven ?

The official website of UPC KU Leuven is http://www.upckuleuven.be.

What is UPC KU Leuven's cybersecurity risk score?

UPC KU Leuven has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 758 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has UPC KU Leuven experienced?

According to Rankiteo, UPC KU Leuven currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has UPC KU Leuven been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, UPC KU Leuven has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does UPC KU Leuven have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, UPC KU Leuven is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does UPC KU Leuven have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, UPC KU Leuven does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does UPC KU Leuven comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, UPC KU Leuven is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does UPC KU Leuven have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, UPC KU Leuven does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does UPC KU Leuven comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, UPC KU Leuven is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does UPC KU Leuven have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,UPC KU Leuven is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does UPC KU Leuven operate in ?

UPC KU Leuven operates primarily in the Mental Health Care industry.

How many employees does UPC KU Leuven have ?

UPC KU Leuven employs approximately 564 people worldwide.

Does UPC KU Leuven own any subsidiaries ?

UPC KU Leuven presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does UPC KU Leuven have ?

UPC KU Leuven's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 6,784 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for UPC KU Leuven ?

UPC KU Leuven is classified under the NAICS code 62133, which corresponds to Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians).

Does UPC KU Leuven have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, UPC KU Leuven does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does UPC KU Leuven have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, UPC KU Leuven maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/upc-kuleuven.

How many cybersecurity incidents has UPC KU Leuven experienced ?

As of June 16, 2026, Rankiteo reports that UPC KU Leuven has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does UPC KU Leuven have ?

UPC KU Leuven has an estimated 5,423 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

UKL

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

758

/1000

Fair

783

/1000

Fair

UPC KU Leuven Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

upckuleuven.be

Add Your Compliance Badge

In het Universitair Psychiatrisch Centrum KU Leuven vind je kwaliteitsvolle zorg voor emotionele, psychische of psychiatrische problemen. Het is gehuisvest op Campus Gasthuisberg en Campus Kortenberg en heeft diverse mobiele teams voor zorg aan huis in de oostelijke regio van Vlaams-Brabant.

UKL A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

UKL

UPC KU Leuven CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

UKL Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for UKL

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UPC KU Leuven in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UPC KU Leuven in 2026.

Incident Types UKL vs Mental Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UPC KU Leuven in 2026.

Incident History - UKL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

UPC KU Leuven Subsidiaries

UKL

Mental Health Care

Website: http://www.upckuleuven.be

Company Size: 564

UZ LeuvenHospitals and Health Care

KU LeuvenResearch Services

KU Leuven Research & DevelopmentResearch Services

YouReCa@KU LeuvenHigher Education

EUTHORITYResearch Services

Jura FalconisEducation Administration Programs

KU Leuven Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD)Research Services

Instituut voor Arbeidsrecht - KU LeuvenEducation Administration Programs

KU Leuven ICTSIT Services and IT Consulting

Loading…

UPC KU Leuven Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

UPC KU Leuven CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-53430

SUMMARY

Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc (GRPC.Compressor.Gzip, GRPC.Message modules) allows a denial of service via a gzip decompression bomb. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/grpc/compressor/gzip.ex, lib/grpc/message.ex and program routines 'Elixir.GRPC.Compressor.Gzip':decompress/1, 'Elixir.GRPC.Message':from_data/2. 'Elixir.GRPC.Compressor.Gzip':decompress/1 calls :zlib.gunzip/1 directly on attacker-controlled bytes with no decompressed-size limit, ratio check, or incremental decoding. Because this module is the registered gzip GRPC.Compressor implementation, it is invoked automatically whenever an incoming gRPC frame carries the grpc-encoding: gzip header. :zlib.gunzip/1 allocates the entire decompressed result as a single binary, so a small highly compressible payload (for example a few kilobytes of zeros, which gzip compresses at roughly 1000:1) expands to multiple gigabytes inside a single call. The max_receive_message_length limit is enforced only against the already-decompressed message, so it provides no protection. An unauthenticated remote peer can send a single crafted frame to exhaust the BEAM node's heap and trigger an out-of-memory kill. This issue affects grpc: from 0.4.0 before 1.0.0.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48854

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc allows unauthenticated attackers to exhaust the BEAM's memory and crash the server by streaming a large or slow-trickle unary request body. 'Elixir.GRPC.Server.Adapters.Cowboy.Handler':read_full_body/3 (lib/grpc/server/adapters/cowboy/handler.ex) accumulates every received chunk into a single growing binary with no size cap. Additionally, when the client omits the grpc-timeout header, the per-chunk read timeout resolves to :infinity, allowing a slow-trickle client to keep the connection alive indefinitely while memory grows. A single connection is sufficient to exhaust server memory and crash the node. This issue affects grpc from 0.3.1 before 1.0.0.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48853

SUMMARY

Deserialization of Untrusted Data and Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerabilities in elixir-grpc grpc allow unauthenticated attackers to crash the BEAM node via atom table exhaustion and, when a decoded term flows into a call site that invokes it, achieve remote code execution on the server. 'Elixir.GRPC.Codec.Erlpack':decode/2 (lib/grpc/codec/erlpack.ex) calls :erlang.binary_to_term/1 on the raw gRPC message body without the :safe option, no size bound, and no type guard. Any unauthenticated peer that sends a request with Content-Type: application/grpc+erlpack can send a crafted payload that mints arbitrary new atoms (which are never garbage-collected, exhausting the bounded atom table and crashing the VM) or that encodes a fun term which, if applied anywhere downstream, executes attacker-controlled code inside the server process. This issue affects grpc from 0.4.0 before 1.0.0.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48723

SUMMARY

The browserstack-cypress-cli is BrowserStack's CLI which allows users to run Cypress tests on BrowserStack. Versions prior to 1.36.4 are vulnerable to OS command injection via the cypress_config_file configuration parameter. In readCypressConfigUtil.js, the loadJsFile() function constructs a shell command by interpolating the user-controlled cypress_config_filepath value into a template literal, then executes it via child_process.execSync(). Shell metacharacters in the config path (specifically " and ;) allow breaking out of the quoted argument and injecting arbitrary commands. This issue has been fixed in version 1.36.6.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48599

SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc allows authenticated attackers to access or modify resources belonging to other users by smuggling a conflicting value for any path-bound field via the query string or request body. In 'Elixir.GRPC.Server.Transcode':map_request/5 (lib/grpc/server/transcode.ex), all three clauses use Map.merge/2 with path bindings as the first argument, giving them the lowest merge precedence. A request such as GET /users/me/profile?user_id=victim (or a POST with {"user_id": "victim"} when body: "*") yields a decoded protobuf struct where the path-bound field carries the attacker-supplied value rather than the router-extracted value. Any handler that uses the path-bound field for authorization, multi-tenancy scoping, or ownership checks is silently bypassed. This issue affects grpc from 0.8.0 before 1.0.0.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…