Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

University of CaliforniaUniversity of California
VS
Newcastle UniversityNewcastle University
University of California

University of California

1111 Franklin St, Oakland, 94607, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
811/1000Good

No other university does as much for so many as the University of California. For almost 150 years, the University of California has educated the brightest minds and helped California become a beacon of innovation. Our campuses routinely are ranked among the best in the...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:149,251
Subsidiaries:59
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Newcastle University

Newcastle University

King's Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, GB, NE1 7RU

Last Update: 10/07/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.ncl.ac.uk/
643/1000Poor

Newcastle University is a Russell Group university in the North East of England with a thriving international community of some 27,750 students from over 130 countries worldwide. As a member of the Russell Group of research intensive universities we have a world-class ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:10,193
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
University of California

University of California

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Newcastle University

Newcastle University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of California in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Newcastle University has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - University of California (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of California cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Newcastle University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newcastle University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
University of California

University of California

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Newcastle University

Newcastle University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IMPNEW1783702112
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
NEW21271123

FAQ

Between University of California company and Newcastle University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between University of California company and Newcastle University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between University of California company and Newcastle University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between University of California company and Newcastle University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between University of California company and Newcastle University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between University of California company and Newcastle University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between University of California company and Newcastle University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between University of California company and Newcastle University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between University of California company and Newcastle University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between University of California company and Newcastle University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between University of California company and Newcastle University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between University of California and Newcastle University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between University of California and Newcastle University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - University of California or Newcastle University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - University of California or Newcastle University ?
Between University of California and Newcastle University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between University of California and Newcastle University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1