Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UNIQA osiguranje SrbijaUNIQA osiguranje Srbija
VS
AflacAflac
UNIQA osiguranje Srbija

UNIQA osiguranje Srbija

Milutina Milankovića 134g, Belgrade, 11000, RS

Last Update: 20/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.uniqa.rs
753/1000Fair

UNIQA Srbija članica je jednog od vodećih evropskih osiguravajućih koncerna - austrijske UNIQA grupe, koja sa tradicijom poslovanja dugom 200 godina posluje na 14 tržišta Evrope i broji više od 17 miliona klijenata. U Srbiji ima tradiciju poslovanja dugu više od 20 godi...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:326
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aflac

Aflac

1932 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, 31999, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.aflac.com
491/1000Critical

Over 50 Million people worldwide have chosen Aflac because of our commitment to providing customers with the confidence that comes from knowing they have assistance in being prepared for whatever life may bring. With Aflac, whether you're a large business or a small o...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:18,043
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UNIQA osiguranje Srbija

UNIQA osiguranje Srbija

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aflac

Aflac

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNIQA osiguranje Srbija in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Aflac has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - UNIQA osiguranje Srbija (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNIQA osiguranje Srbija cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aflac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aflac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UNIQA osiguranje Srbija

UNIQA osiguranje Srbija

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aflac

Aflac

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AFLJAGNUC1768389868
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFL1768391547
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFL2462024101425

FAQ

Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija company and Aflac company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija company and Aflac company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija company and Aflac company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija company and Aflac company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija company and Aflac company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UNIQA osiguranje Srbija or Aflac ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UNIQA osiguranje Srbija or Aflac ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija and Aflac, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UNIQA osiguranje Srbija and Aflac, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA