Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Unimed do Brasil » UNIWESFOX1780562007

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (UNIWESFOX1780562007)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-163
Company Score Before Incident808 / 1000
Company Score After Incident645 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERUNIWESFOX1780562007
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED115 TB (total across all...
INCIDENT DATE02/05/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Unimed do Brasil's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Unimed do Brasil Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Unimed do Brasil breach identified under incident ID UNIWESFOX1780562007.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Unimed do Brasil's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/unimeddobrasil, the number of followers: 2107657, the industry type: Wellness and Fitness Services and the number of employees: 4770 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 808 and after the incident was 645 with a difference of -163 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Unimed do Brasil and their customers.

On 31 May 2026, Universitat de València disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Ransomware Attacks Rise in May 2026, With Education and Retail Sectors Hit Hardest".

Ransomware attacks increased by 3% in May 2026, with 661 incidents recorded.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 115 TB (total across all attacks in May 2026), with nearly ['120,000+ (Unimed)', '142,000+ (Cardinal Services)', '113,000+ (Western Orthopaedics)'] records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of ['$4.48 million (UnoAerre Industries)'].

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks increased by 3% in May 2026, with 661 incidents recorded and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no specific attack vector disclosed, but ransomware groups active. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks recorded, implying malicious file execution and Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (T1059.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating common ransomware tactic, though not explicitly mentioned. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups likely used compromised credentials. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks often involve privilege escalation. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains like Qilin and DragonForce likely use obfuscation and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware often disables security tools. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 120,000+ records exposed (Unimed), implying credential access and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk noted in incident. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating 115 TB of data stolen, implying discovery phase. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 8 TB of data stolen from Foxconn North America and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 20.8 TB stolen by DragonForce, largest volume reported. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating nearly 115 TB of data stolen across all attacks and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating iNC auctioned 200–300 GB of stolen data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks with data encryption confirmed and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware may involve destructive tactics. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
External Remote Services (50%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (50%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (70%)
Credentials from Password Stores (60%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Network Shared Drive (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Data Destruction (50%)

Sources & References