What is the official website of UNICEF Innocenti ?

The official website of UNICEF Innocenti is https://www.unicef.org/innocenti.

What is UNICEF Innocenti's cybersecurity risk score?

UNICEF Innocenti has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 768 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has UNICEF Innocenti experienced?

According to Rankiteo, UNICEF Innocenti currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has UNICEF Innocenti been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, UNICEF Innocenti has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does UNICEF Innocenti have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, UNICEF Innocenti is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does UNICEF Innocenti have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, UNICEF Innocenti does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does UNICEF Innocenti comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, UNICEF Innocenti is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does UNICEF Innocenti have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, UNICEF Innocenti does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does UNICEF Innocenti comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, UNICEF Innocenti is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does UNICEF Innocenti have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,UNICEF Innocenti is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does UNICEF Innocenti operate in ?

UNICEF Innocenti operates primarily in the Research industry.

How many employees does UNICEF Innocenti have ?

UNICEF Innocenti employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does UNICEF Innocenti own any subsidiaries ?

UNICEF Innocenti presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does UNICEF Innocenti have ?

UNICEF Innocenti's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 75,813 followers.

Does UNICEF Innocenti have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, UNICEF Innocenti does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does UNICEF Innocenti have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, UNICEF Innocenti maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/unicefinnocenti.

How many cybersecurity incidents has UNICEF Innocenti experienced ?

As of August 11, 2026, Rankiteo reports that UNICEF Innocenti has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does UNICEF Innocenti have ?

UNICEF Innocenti has an estimated 1,404 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has UNICEF Innocenti faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

UNICEF Innocenti

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

768

/1000

Fair

793

/1000

Fair

UNICEF Innocenti Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

unicef.org

Add Your Compliance Badge

We are @UNICEF Office of Strategy and Evidence – Innocenti. We generate knowledge, drive change and find answers #ForEveryChild.

UNICEF Innocenti A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

UNICEF Innocenti

UNICEF Innocenti CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

UNICEF Innocenti

Data Leak

09/2019

UNI161313423

Loading…

A.I.

UNICEF Innocenti Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for UNICEF Innocenti

Incidents vs Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNICEF Innocenti in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNICEF Innocenti in 2026.

Incident Types UNICEF Innocenti vs Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNICEF Innocenti in 2026.

Incident History - UNICEF Innocenti (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

UNICEF Innocenti Subsidiaries

UNICEF Innocenti

Research

Website: https://www.unicef.org/innocenti

Company Size: 51-200 employees

UNICEFNon-profit Organizations

UNICEF DeutschlandNon-profit Organizations

UNICEF NigeriaNon-profit Organizations

UNICEF IndiaNon-profit Organizations

UNICEF in the Democratic Republic of the CongoNon-profit Organizations

UNICEF EthiopiaNon-profit Organizations

UNICEF Latin America and CaribbeanNon-profit Organizations

Loading…

UNICEF Innocenti Similar Companies

Aarhus University

au.dk

About Aarhus University Aarhus University is a leading international research university covering all scientific areas with a staff of 11.000 employees and 44.500 students, the majority are post-graduate students enrolled on Master’s and PhD programmes. Aarhus University is among the top 100 universities in the world. The aim of the university is to sustain and enhance a high standard in both research and education, which has placed it among the international elite. Aarhus University was established in 1928 as a small private initiative. It has since grown to become a leading public research university with international reach covering all academic fields and address basic, applied and strategic research as well as the research-based consultancy provided to public authorities and private business. One of Aarhus University’s focus areas is talent development. An activity considered so important that it is singled out as one of the four core activities in the Aarhus University strategy alongside excellent research, world-class education and inspiring research-based consultancy. Research at Aarhus University is both organised in traditional departments under the four faculties and in interdisciplinary research centres. In addition, Aarhus University researchers engage in research collaboration under the auspices of Knowledge Management Centres with external partners such as government organisations, private enterprises, NGOs and Aarhus University’s wide range of international partner universities.

Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen

ku.dk

PRIVACY POLICY at the University of Copenhagen: https://informationssikkerhed.ku.dk/english/protection-of-information-privacy/privacy-policy/ With over 40,000 students and more than 9,000 employees, the University of Copenhagen is the largest institution of research and education in Denmark. The purpose of the University – to quote the University Statute – is to ’conduct research and provide further education to the highest academic level’. Approximately one hundred different institutes, departments, laboratories, centres, museums, etc., form the nucleus of the University, where professors, lecturers and other academic staff, as well as most of the technical and administrative personnel, carry out their daily work, and where teaching takes place. These activities take place in various environments ranging from the plant world of the Botanical Gardens, through high-technology laboratories and auditoriums, to the historic buildings and lecture rooms of Frue Plads and other locations.

Loading…

NEWS

UNICEF Innocenti CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

December 31, 2025 08:00 AM

Armenia Launches First-Ever National Study on Technology-Facilitated Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse

YEREVAN, 31 December - A groundbreaking study released today reveals that five per cent of internet-using children aged 12 to 17 were...

Read Article

June 05, 2025 03:40 PM

Keeping children safe online

Sexual exploitation and abuse is one of the most insidious threats children face online. AI is changing the way they're exposed to it.

Read Article

April 14, 2025 07:00 AM

Strengthening data governance in EdTech

Imagine a world where children can learn, explore, and thrive in digital environments with confidence, knowing their data is safeguarded and...

Read Article

March 10, 2025 07:00 AM

The future of Artificial Intelligence

In today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to reshape industries, systems,...

Read Article

February 27, 2025 01:42 PM

Our management | Office of Strategy and Evidence Innocenti

Bo Viktor Nylund is Director of UNICEF Innocenti – Global Office of Research and Foresight in Florence, Italy, appointed in October 2022.

Read Article

January 13, 2025 08:00 AM

Prospects for Children in 2025: Building Resilient Systems for Children’s Futures

The world is facing a new and intensifying era of crisis for children. Many of these crises – including climate change, conflict and...

Read Article

December 12, 2024 02:03 PM

How will childhood look in the 21st century?

This Explainer outlines four quantified scenarios for the long-term future, exploring the impact of different paths on development, climate, and geopolitics.

Read Article

December 10, 2024 06:24 PM

Six ways to help end online child sexual exploitation and abuse

Children and young people's lives are an increasingly seamless interplay of online and in-person experiences – as they harness the internet's many...

Read Article

November 14, 2024 11:10 PM

What does neurotechnology mean for children? | Office of Strategy and Evidence Innocenti

In the past decade, neurotechnology – techniques and devices aimed at monitoring and modulating functions of the brain and nervous system – has become a...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8718

SUMMARY

tls_opt_dtls_peer_connection_id_value_get() in subsys/net/lib/sockets/sockets_tls.c, which handles getsockopt(SOL_TLS, TLS_DTLS_PEER_CID_VALUE), passed the caller-supplied optval directly to mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() without verifying the buffer was at least MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX (default 32) bytes. mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() copies the peer-negotiated DTLS Connection ID (length 1..MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX) into that buffer without a destination-size parameter, so a caller-supplied optlen smaller than the CID causes a write of up to 31 bytes past the buffer end. In CONFIG_USERSPACE builds the getsockopt syscall verifier (z_vrfy_zsock_getsockopt) bounce-buffers the user's optval into a kernel allocation of exactly optlen bytes (k_usermode_alloc_from_copy -> z_thread_malloc), so an unprivileged user thread that passes a small optlen on a connected DTLS socket with Connection ID enabled induces a kernel-heap buffer overflow, with the overflowing content being the remote peer's CID. The defect requires CONFIG_MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID, an established DTLS session with a negotiated peer CID, and (for the kernel-crossing case) CONFIG_USERSPACE. Introduced when the TLS_DTLS_CID option was added (v3.5.0). The fix rejects callers whose optlen is below MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX with -EINVAL.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.8

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48161

SUMMARY

react18-use is a React 19 use hook shim. Between 2026-05-19 01:07:01 and 2026-05-19 15:20:43, the default branch contained malicious commits 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 through 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 that executed remote attacker-controlled code on developer machines during `npm install`. The commits were removed by force-push, but local clones, forks, and direct-SHA URLs may still contain them, and `npm install` against an affected checkout will still execute the code today. The package was not published to npm. `src/install.js` was added and wired into the `postinstall` script. It fetched a JavaScript payload from an attacker-controlled HTTPS endpoint (configurable via an environment variable), disabled TLS verification, and evaluated the response as code with `require` available. Execution was deliberately skipped on CI and cloud/serverless environments, targeting developer workstations. The second-stage payload was attacker-hosted and cannot be reconstructed. Assume full compromise of anything reachable from a Node process with the user's permissions. Those who ran `npm install` against an affected checkout on a developer machine on or after 2026-05-19 01:07:01 should treat the machine as compromised, rotate every credential the machine could reach, audit account activity since 2026-05-19 01:07:01, and clean local clones.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/dai-shi/react18-use/security/advisories/GHSA-32xh-vg5f-64fm

CVE-2026-11812

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub management subsystem (subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c) drives every update operation through a single file-scope ctx structure that holds the CoAP block context, payload buffer, status code, socket, and a one-element poll-fd array fds[1]. Access to ctx was not serialized, and prepare_fds() wrote ctx.fds[ctx.nfds] and incremented ctx.nfds with no bounds check. Two independent paths mutate ctx concurrently: the background autohandler running on the system workqueue, and user-triggered operations reached through the updatehub run shell command, direct API calls, or — since the operations are exposed as syscalls — userspace threads. When a second flow enters prepare_fds() while ctx.nfds is already 1, the write lands one element past the array; by struct layout it overlaps the adjacent ctx.sock/ctx.nfds members. More broadly, the unsynchronized sharing lets two flows interleave connection setup and teardown, double-closing a socket descriptor or scribbling the shared buffers. The result is corruption of the update subsystem's internal state and denial of service of the firmware-update path; the out-of-bounds write is contained within the ctx structure and there is no demonstrated path to memory outside it or to code execution. Triggering requires a local actor able to invoke update operations (or, with CONFIG_USERSPACE, an unprivileged userspace thread) and to win a timing race against the background handler; remote peers cannot control the race timing. The fix serializes the entry points with a mutex and adds a bounds check to prepare_fds().

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-11811

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub over-the-air update client's start_coap_client() in subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c leaks the CoAP/DTLS socket descriptor on its connection-setup failure paths. The shared error: cleanup gated socket closing on a ret > 0 flag, but ret was set to -1 immediately after the socket was created, so when zsock_setsockopt() (DTLS) or zsock_connect() subsequently failed the gate was false and cleanup_connection() was never called. The open descriptor in the global ctx.sock was then overwritten by the next attempt, permanently leaking it from the socket / net_context pool until reboot. The failing setup path is reached every time the OTA client tries to contact the UpdateHub server and the connection cannot be established — driven automatically by the periodic autohandler() poll (and on demand via the updatehub_probe()/updatehub_update() API or the updatehub run shell command). The DTLS handshake/connect outcome is influenceable by a network or on-path attacker who drops, resets, or otherwise disrupts traffic to the server, and also fails naturally whenever the server is unreachable. Each failed attempt permanently leaks one descriptor; once the shared socket pool is exhausted, networking degrades device-wide until the device is rebooted, a denial-of-service condition. Severity is low because the leak rate is bounded by the configured OTA poll interval (default once per 24 hours), the effect is gradual and recovered by reboot, and only builds with the UpdateHub client enabled are affected. There is no memory-corruption, information-disclosure, or authentication impact.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2025-30241

SUMMARY

Certain web interface components in affected TP-Link Aginet devices do not validate and sanitize user-supplied input properly before passing it to system-level command execution functions. An authenticated adjacent attacker may inject specially crafted input to execute arbitrary operation system commands with elevated privileges. Successful exploitation may allow execution of arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full device compromise.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5239/

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…