Comparison Overview
UL Solutions in India

UL Solutions in India
Kalyani Platina, 3rd Floor, Block I, No. 24, Bengaluru, 560 066, IN
Last Update: 31/01/2026
A global leader in applied safety science, UL Solutions transforms safety, security, and sustainability challenges into opportunities for customers in more than 100 countries. UL Solutions delivers testing, inspection and certification services, together with software p...

Rakuten
Rakuten Crimson House, Setagaya-ku, 158-0094, JP
Last Update: 07/10/2026
Rakuten Group, Inc. (TSE: 4755) is a global technology leader in services that empower individuals, communities, businesses and society. Founded in Tokyo in 1997 as an online marketplace, Rakuten has expanded to offer services in e-commerce, fintech, digital content and...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

UL Solutions in India







Rakuten






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UL Solutions in India in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Rakuten has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - UL Solutions in India (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UL Solutions in India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Rakuten (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rakuten cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

UL Solutions in India

Rakuten
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.