What is the official website of Union League Club of Chicago ?

The official website of Union League Club of Chicago is http://www.ulcc.org.

What is Union League Club of Chicago's cybersecurity risk score?

Union League Club of Chicago has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 757 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Union League Club of Chicago experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Union League Club of Chicago currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Union League Club of Chicago been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Union League Club of Chicago has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Union League Club of Chicago have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Union League Club of Chicago is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Union League Club of Chicago have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Union League Club of Chicago does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Union League Club of Chicago comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Union League Club of Chicago is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Union League Club of Chicago have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Union League Club of Chicago does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Union League Club of Chicago comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Union League Club of Chicago is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Union League Club of Chicago have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Union League Club of Chicago is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Union League Club of Chicago operate in ?

Union League Club of Chicago operates primarily in the Civic and Social Organizations industry.

How many employees does Union League Club of Chicago have ?

Union League Club of Chicago employs approximately 178 people worldwide.

Does Union League Club of Chicago own any subsidiaries ?

Union League Club of Chicago presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Union League Club of Chicago have ?

Union League Club of Chicago's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 9,649 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Union League Club of Chicago ?

Union League Club of Chicago is classified under the NAICS code 8134, which corresponds to Civic and Social Organizations.

Does Union League Club of Chicago have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Union League Club of Chicago does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Union League Club of Chicago have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Union League Club of Chicago maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ulcchicago.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Union League Club of Chicago experienced ?

As of August 11, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Union League Club of Chicago has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Union League Club of Chicago have ?

Union League Club of Chicago has an estimated 5,429 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Union League Club of Chicago faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

ULCC

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

757

/1000

Fair

782

/1000

Fair

Union League Club of Chicago Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

ulcc.org

Add Your Compliance Badge

The strength of the ULCC is our membership. We are a diverse group of individuals with a common desire to meet others, make connections, learn new things, enjoy the city's cultural offerings and find ways to give back to our community and country. We are from different places, backgrounds, professions and points of view. We are members because we value the opportunity to become friends and together enjoy the ULCC's extensive array of programming and amenities. We consider our clubhouse a home away from home with first-class benefits. There are multiple comfortable spaces to bring a laptop and get serious work done or find time to chat with members from different professions and share ideas and business opportunities. A few floors away are

ULCC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

ULCC

Union League Club of Chicago CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Union League Club o...

Breach

05/2016

UNI118131222

Loading…

A.I.

ULCC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for ULCC

Incidents vs Civic and Social Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Union League Club of Chicago in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Union League Club of Chicago in 2026.

Incident Types ULCC vs Civic and Social Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Union League Club of Chicago in 2026.

Incident History - ULCC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Union League Club of Chicago Subsidiaries

Parent Company

ULCC

Civic and Social Organizations

Website: http://www.ulcc.org

Company Size: 178

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Union League Club of Chicago Similar Companies

SESI - Serviço Social da Indústria / Departamento Nacional

sesi.org.br

Organization supported by Brazilain industries in order to contribute for industrial entreprises competitiveness and susitainability through the promotion of quality of life of industrial workers. SESI offers services on Education, Health, Leisure and Social Responsibility areas. SESI National Department define and implement strategies, policies and guidelines, leading the "SESI System" and its 27 Regional Departments.

Loading…

NEWS

Union League Club of Chicago CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

September 19, 2025 09:53 AM

Hayley Chang

Hayley Chang serves as Director and Associate General Counsel for Cybersecurity and Investigations at Meta (formerly Facebook), where she leads the legal...

Read Article

August 20, 2025 07:00 AM

Bill Daley, Ray LaHood revive Illinois map fight

Happy Wednesday, Illinois. We're getting antsy for our end-of-summer hiatus that starts Monday, so send your tips and scoops soon to get...

Read Article

April 03, 2025 07:00 AM

Winners and highly commended announced for Cyber Insurance Awards USA 2025

At a glittering Awards Ceremony held last night at the Union League Club of Chicago hosted by the talented comedian, Adam Mamawala,...

Read Article

September 05, 2023 01:37 PM

Regina Jones

Regina Jones is Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer of ADM and a member of the company's Executive Council.

Read Article

June 07, 2023 07:00 AM

Eastern Michigan University’s Information Assurance Student Association ranks No. 1 in Michigan and No. 18 nationally by Cyber Power Rankings

YPSILANTI – Eastern Michigan University's Information Assurance Student Association (IASA) was ranked No. 1 in Michigan and No.

Read Article

September 23, 2020 07:00 AM

ABOUT AMY CONEY BARRETT — THE HANDLING OF COVID — JUICE FOR KILBRIDE — NEW BULLS COACH

Good Wednesday morning, Illinois. STORY TO WATCH: Pritzker puts Illinois National Guard 'in a state of readiness' ahead of Kentucky...

Read Article

February 15, 2014 08:00 AM

Justice Scalia: Chicago pizza ‘shouldn’t be called pizza’

The verdict on Chicago-style pizza is, it's not pizza, says justice.

Read Article

June 30, 2013 07:00 AM

An Anti-Modern Lodging

Private and university clubs' central location and reasonable rates make them a smart option for business travelers who are not put off by...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8718

SUMMARY

tls_opt_dtls_peer_connection_id_value_get() in subsys/net/lib/sockets/sockets_tls.c, which handles getsockopt(SOL_TLS, TLS_DTLS_PEER_CID_VALUE), passed the caller-supplied optval directly to mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() without verifying the buffer was at least MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX (default 32) bytes. mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() copies the peer-negotiated DTLS Connection ID (length 1..MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX) into that buffer without a destination-size parameter, so a caller-supplied optlen smaller than the CID causes a write of up to 31 bytes past the buffer end. In CONFIG_USERSPACE builds the getsockopt syscall verifier (z_vrfy_zsock_getsockopt) bounce-buffers the user's optval into a kernel allocation of exactly optlen bytes (k_usermode_alloc_from_copy -> z_thread_malloc), so an unprivileged user thread that passes a small optlen on a connected DTLS socket with Connection ID enabled induces a kernel-heap buffer overflow, with the overflowing content being the remote peer's CID. The defect requires CONFIG_MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID, an established DTLS session with a negotiated peer CID, and (for the kernel-crossing case) CONFIG_USERSPACE. Introduced when the TLS_DTLS_CID option was added (v3.5.0). The fix rejects callers whose optlen is below MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX with -EINVAL.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.8

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48161

SUMMARY

react18-use is a React 19 use hook shim. Between 2026-05-19 01:07:01 and 2026-05-19 15:20:43, the default branch contained malicious commits 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 through 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 that executed remote attacker-controlled code on developer machines during `npm install`. The commits were removed by force-push, but local clones, forks, and direct-SHA URLs may still contain them, and `npm install` against an affected checkout will still execute the code today. The package was not published to npm. `src/install.js` was added and wired into the `postinstall` script. It fetched a JavaScript payload from an attacker-controlled HTTPS endpoint (configurable via an environment variable), disabled TLS verification, and evaluated the response as code with `require` available. Execution was deliberately skipped on CI and cloud/serverless environments, targeting developer workstations. The second-stage payload was attacker-hosted and cannot be reconstructed. Assume full compromise of anything reachable from a Node process with the user's permissions. Those who ran `npm install` against an affected checkout on a developer machine on or after 2026-05-19 01:07:01 should treat the machine as compromised, rotate every credential the machine could reach, audit account activity since 2026-05-19 01:07:01, and clean local clones.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/dai-shi/react18-use/security/advisories/GHSA-32xh-vg5f-64fm

CVE-2026-11812

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub management subsystem (subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c) drives every update operation through a single file-scope ctx structure that holds the CoAP block context, payload buffer, status code, socket, and a one-element poll-fd array fds[1]. Access to ctx was not serialized, and prepare_fds() wrote ctx.fds[ctx.nfds] and incremented ctx.nfds with no bounds check. Two independent paths mutate ctx concurrently: the background autohandler running on the system workqueue, and user-triggered operations reached through the updatehub run shell command, direct API calls, or — since the operations are exposed as syscalls — userspace threads. When a second flow enters prepare_fds() while ctx.nfds is already 1, the write lands one element past the array; by struct layout it overlaps the adjacent ctx.sock/ctx.nfds members. More broadly, the unsynchronized sharing lets two flows interleave connection setup and teardown, double-closing a socket descriptor or scribbling the shared buffers. The result is corruption of the update subsystem's internal state and denial of service of the firmware-update path; the out-of-bounds write is contained within the ctx structure and there is no demonstrated path to memory outside it or to code execution. Triggering requires a local actor able to invoke update operations (or, with CONFIG_USERSPACE, an unprivileged userspace thread) and to win a timing race against the background handler; remote peers cannot control the race timing. The fix serializes the entry points with a mutex and adds a bounds check to prepare_fds().

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-11811

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub over-the-air update client's start_coap_client() in subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c leaks the CoAP/DTLS socket descriptor on its connection-setup failure paths. The shared error: cleanup gated socket closing on a ret > 0 flag, but ret was set to -1 immediately after the socket was created, so when zsock_setsockopt() (DTLS) or zsock_connect() subsequently failed the gate was false and cleanup_connection() was never called. The open descriptor in the global ctx.sock was then overwritten by the next attempt, permanently leaking it from the socket / net_context pool until reboot. The failing setup path is reached every time the OTA client tries to contact the UpdateHub server and the connection cannot be established — driven automatically by the periodic autohandler() poll (and on demand via the updatehub_probe()/updatehub_update() API or the updatehub run shell command). The DTLS handshake/connect outcome is influenceable by a network or on-path attacker who drops, resets, or otherwise disrupts traffic to the server, and also fails naturally whenever the server is unreachable. Each failed attempt permanently leaks one descriptor; once the shared socket pool is exhausted, networking degrades device-wide until the device is rebooted, a denial-of-service condition. Severity is low because the leak rate is bounded by the configured OTA poll interval (default once per 24 hours), the effect is gradual and recovered by reboot, and only builds with the UpdateHub client enabled are affected. There is no memory-corruption, information-disclosure, or authentication impact.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2025-30241

SUMMARY

Certain web interface components in affected TP-Link Aginet devices do not validate and sanitize user-supplied input properly before passing it to system-level command execution functions. An authenticated adjacent attacker may inject specially crafted input to execute arbitrary operation system commands with elevated privileges. Successful exploitation may allow execution of arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full device compromise.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5239/

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…