Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Ministry of Justice UK

Ministry of Justice UK Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

www.gov.uk

This is the official LinkedIn page of the UK Ministry of Justice. This page is not moderated. To find out more about our work follow us on: X at www.twitter.com/mojgovuk Facebook at www.facebook.com/ministryofjusticeuk Instagram at www.instagram.com/mojgovuk


MJU A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

MJU
Company Information
Website:http://www.gov.uk/moj
Employees number:19,872
Number of followers:296,157
NAICS:92
Industry Type:Government Administration
Homepage:www.gov.uk
MJU Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
logo
MJUGovernment Administration
Updated:
02/04/2026
682/1000
Weak
B
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
MJU Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
MJUGovernment Administration
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

MJU
MJUWeak
Current Score
682B (WEAK)
01000
3 incidents
-66 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
689Before Incident
JUNE 2026
688Before Incident
MAY 2026
685Before Incident
APRIL 2026
684Before Incident
MARCH 2026
682Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
679Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
675Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
673Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
672Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
735Before Incident
Breach
16 Oct 2025MJU
Ministry of Justice (UK)

Exposure of Over 3,000 UK Civil Servant Passwords on the Dark Web

669After Incident
HIGH-66
UK-0592305101625
A report by NordPass and NordStellar revealed that 3,014 passwords belonging to UK civil servants—including those from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ)—were exposed on the dark web. The MoJ was the most affected institution, with 36 unique exposed passwords, many of which were weak, reused, or easily guessable (e.g., '12345678' or 'password'). The breach stemmed from poor cyber hygiene, including password recycling across accounts and failure to enforce strong authentication policies. The exposure poses significant risks not only to the MoJ’s internal operations but also to national security, as compromised credentials could enable unauthorized access to sensitive government systems. Civil servants’ accounts, if hijacked, might facilitate phishing attacks, data leaks, or lateral movement into broader public infrastructure. The incident underscores systemic vulnerabilities in public-sector cybersecurity, where weak password practices jeopardize both employee data and citizen trust. While no direct data theft was confirmed, the potential for escalation—such as targeted attacks on justice systems or exploitation of administrative privileges—remains high. The report urges mandatory password managers, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and regular credential rotation to mitigate future risks.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
data breachcredential exposure
IMPACT
passwords (3,014 unique exposures)Operational Impact: Potential unauthorized access to public institution systems, risk to national strategic interestsBrand Reputation Impact: Negative perception of public sector cybersecurity practicesIdentity Theft Risk: High (due to reused passwords across accounts)
DATA BREACH
passwords/credentialsSensitivity Of Data: High (government/ civil servant credentials)Data Exfiltration: Yes (exposed on dark web)
SEPTEMBER 2025
735Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
733Before Incident
JANUARY 2025
756Before Incident
Cyber Attack
31 Dec 2024MJU
Ministry of Justice: MoJ spent £50M on security at Legal Aid Agency before attack

Cyberattack on the UK's Legal Aid Agency (LAA)

722After Incident
CRITICAL-34
UK-1767792855
UK Ministry of Justice Faces Criticism Over £50M Cybersecurity Failures in Legal Aid Agency Breach The UK’s Ministry of Justice (MoJ) spent £50 million ($67 million) on cybersecurity upgrades for the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) before a major cyberattack exposed critical vulnerabilities, according to a report by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). Despite the investment, the attack—described as one of the most sensitive in British history—went undetected for four months, raising concerns over the MoJ’s risk management. The LAA’s cybersecurity risks had been flagged as "extremely high" on its risk register since 2021, prompting three rounds of funding (£8.5M, £10.5M, and £32M) to address gaps. However, the attack began in December 2024 and was only discovered in April 2025, with servers taken offline nearly a month later in May. A portion of the £10.5M funding was used to deploy a new threat detection system, though its operational timeline remains unclear. The breach’s full scope emerged on May 16, 2025, when investigators confirmed attackers had accessed not only legal aid providers’ financial data but also sensitive information on legal aid applicants. The LAA immediately shut down systems, secured an injunction to prevent data leaks, and activated contingency measures. While no providers exited the market, the disruption forced manual processes, straining legal sector workers and delaying case management. To maintain operations, the LAA issued average monthly payments to providers based on pre-attack data, later recovering funds at a 25% rate—meaning a 20-week contingency period would take 20 months to recoup. MoJ permanent secretary Dr. Jo Farrar acknowledged the LAA may require additional funding to fully modernize its IT systems, though budget allocations remain uncertain. The PAC report criticized the MoJ’s handling of the incident, questioning public confidence in its ability to secure personal data. Farrar defended the department’s efforts, citing a comprehensive review of all systems and ongoing investments to counter increasingly sophisticated threats. However, the attack underscores persistent risks in high-priority government systems.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach, Cyberattack
MOTIVATION
Criminal purposes
IMPACT
Financial Loss: £50 million spent on cybersecurity improvements; overpayment to legal aid providers during contingency periodData Compromised: Legal aid applicant data, legal aid provider financial data (account and transaction data), personally identifiable informationSystems Affected: LAA servers, legal aid systemsDowntime: Systems taken offline in May 2025; manual processes implementedOperational Impact: Manual processes for managing caseloads, delayed recovery of overpaid funds (20 months estimated), profound impact on legal sector workers' wellbeingBrand Reputation Impact: Loss of public confidence in MoJ's ability to secure personal dataIdentity Theft Risk: High (personally identifiable information compromised)Payment Information Risk: High (financial data such as account and transaction data accessed)
DATA BREACH
Legal aid applicant dataLegal aid provider financial dataPersonally identifiable informationSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: Yes (potential publication on the web/dark web)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
MARCH 2022
791Before Incident
Breach
01 Mar 2022MJU
Ministry of Justice UK

Unauthorized Access to UK Ministry of Justice Servers

727After Incident
CRITICAL-64
MIN164115322
The employee’s sensitive personal data of UK Ministry of Justice was compromised in an unauthorized access gained to the servers of Justice Academy, an online learning platform used by MoJ. The compromised information includes full name, staff identification information, email address, national insurance number, and details of where they work and with which department or agency. MoJ has reported about 2,152 data breaches and several cyber incidents in the 12 months.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
full namestaff identification informationemail addressnational insurance numberwork detailsdepartment or agency detailsJustice Academy servers
DATA BREACH
Personal InformationHighfull namestaff identification informationemail addressnational insurance numberwork detailsdepartment or agency details

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for MJU ?
?
What was MJU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was MJU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was MJU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was MJU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was MJU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was MJU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was MJU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was MJU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was MJU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was MJU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was MJU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on MJU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with MJU ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view MJU's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?