UHO
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
uk-home-office
Employees number:
16,852
Number of followers:
439,416
NAICS:
92
Industry Type:
Homepage:
www.gov.uk
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
UK _1627996
Scan Status:
In-progress
UK Home Office Company CyberSecurity Posture
www.gov.uk
At the Home Office, we help to ensure that the country is safe and secure. We’ve been looking after UK citizens since 1782. We are responsible for: - working on the problems caused by illegal drug use - shaping the alcohol strategy, policy and licensing conditions - keeping the United Kingdom safe from the threat of terrorism - reducing and preventing crime, and ensuring people feel safe in their homes and communities - securing the UK border and controlling immigration - considering applications to enter and stay in the UK - issuing passports and visas - supporting visible, responsible and accountable policing by empowering the public and freeing up the police to fight crime - fire prevention and rescue These organisations are all part of the Home Office: - Border Force - HM Passport Office (HMPO) - Immigration Enforcement - UK Visas and Immigration (UKVI)
UK Home Office A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
UHO Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
UHO
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
UHO Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
UHO
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
UHO Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
UK Government (Public Sector)
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: The UK government is facing severe criticism for its repeated failures in safeguarding sensitive data, with a history of major breaches exposing highly confidential information. Recent incidents include the **Afghan data leak**, where 19,000 Afghans (including British military allies) and over 100 UK officials had their personal details exposed, endangering lives. Another breach involved **200 abuse survivors in the Church of England**, whose private records were leaked through a compensation scheme. Additionally, the **Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) breach** compromised nearly 10,000 officers' data, risking their safety and that of their families. The **Legal Aid Agency breach** further exposed names, addresses, National Insurance numbers, and criminal histories dating back to 2010.The proposed **mandatory digital ID system** would centralize biometric and identity data for the entire UK population, creating a high-value target for cyberattacks. Experts warn this could lead to **mass surveillance risks**, **foreign adversary exploitation**, and **large-scale identity theft**, with 63% of Britons already distrusting the government’s data security. The cumulative impact of these breaches—combined with the potential for a centralized digital ID—poses existential threats to **national security, civil liberties, and individual safety**, turning the UK into a high-risk surveillance state.
UHO Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for UHO
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UK Home Office in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UK Home Office in 2025.
Incident Types UHO vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UK Home Office in 2025.
Incident History — UHO (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UHO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
UHO Company Subsidiaries
At the Home Office, we help to ensure that the country is safe and secure. We’ve been looking after UK citizens since 1782. We are responsible for: - working on the problems caused by illegal drug use - shaping the alcohol strategy, policy and licensing conditions - keeping the United Kingdom safe from the threat of terrorism - reducing and preventing crime, and ensuring people feel safe in their homes and communities - securing the UK border and controlling immigration - considering applications to enter and stay in the UK - issuing passports and visas - supporting visible, responsible and accountable policing by empowering the public and freeing up the police to fight crime - fire prevention and rescue These organisations are all part of the Home Office: - Border Force - HM Passport Office (HMPO) - Immigration Enforcement - UK Visas and Immigration (UKVI)
Loading...
UHO Similar Companies
Ministry of Environment and Urbanism
MINISTRY of ENVIRONMENT and URBANISM (MEU) MAIN SERVICE UNITS ================== 1) General Directorate of Construction Works 2) General Directorate of Spatial Planning 3) General Directorate of Environmental Management 4) General Directorate of EIA, Permits and Control 5) General Directo
County of Santa Clara
The County of Santa Clara is located at the southern end of the San Francisco Bay and encompasses 1,312 square miles. It has one of the highest median family incomes in the country, and a wide diversity of cultures, backgrounds and talents. The County of Santa Clara continues to attract people fro
HM Revenue & Customs
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) is the UK’s tax, payments and customs authority. We collect the money that pays for the UK’s public services and help families and individuals with targeted financial support. We help the honest majority to get their taxes and payments right, and make it hard for the d
City of Los Angeles
The City of Los Angeles employs more than 45,000 people in a wide range of careers. Visit our website for information on current openings, including regular civil service positions, exempt and emergency appointment opportunities, in addition to internships! The City of Los Angeles is a Mayor-Counci
State of Missouri
Build the Missouri of tomorrow. Ensure a strong foundation today. Join a group of innovative team members focused on driving the State of Missouri forward. As public servants, our team members have the opportunity to produce work that is both lasting and important. This work serves to protect famil
City of Seattle
Work With Purpose. Shape Seattle. Inspire the World. Seattle is more than a world-class city — it’s a vibrant, evolving community rooted in shared values of sustainability, innovation, and inclusion. As a public employer, the City of Seattle is committed to building a city that works for everyone —
State of Maryland
Maryland is on the path to becoming the best state in the nation. Referred to as “America in Miniature”, Maryland embodies the very spirit of the United States. Maryland is home to ethnic groups of every origin, just about every natural feature, and much like our country, opportunity! If you are
Government of Western Australia
Welcome to the official WA Government page where you can stay up to date on the latest information about Western Australia and WA government initiatives. Questions relating to a specific activity within the WA Government should be referred to the relevant Department or Minister’s Office for a re
South African Revenue Service (SARS)
Its main functions are to: collect and administer all national taxes, duties and levies; collect revenue that may be imposed under any other legislation, as agreed on between SARS and an organ of state or institution entitled to the revenue; provide protection against the illegal importation
.png)
UHO CyberSecurity News
November 15, 2025 08:00 AM
EY US - Home | Building a better working world
Our commitment to audit quality. At EY US, we are bringing our bold vision for the future of audit to life with quality at the center,...
November 12, 2025 08:00 AM
UK's Cyber Security and Resilience Bill makes Parliamentary debut
UK government introduced the Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR) Bill to Parliament today, marking a significant overhaul of local...
October 23, 2025 07:00 AM
UK cyber law delays 'deeply concerning,' say MPs
Major recent cybersecurity incidents should spur the British government to act decisively on new cybersecurity laws, opposition MPs say.
October 14, 2025 07:00 AM
Revealed: Hundreds of passwords linked to government departments leaked on dark web
Exclusive: Nine attempts have been made to sell classified UK military documents in the past year – with experts warning it could 'directly...
October 14, 2025 07:00 AM
CyberSmart joins NCRCG to boost cyber resilience for UK SMEs
CyberSmart has joined the National Cyber Resilience Centre Group (NCRCG) as a National Ambassador. NCRCG is funded and supported by the Home...
October 04, 2025 07:00 AM
Hacked Ford screens put anti-RTO slogan above CEO’s face
Conference-room screens at Ford's Dearborn HQ were briefly hijacked on Thursday to display a protest image in an apparent swipe at the...
September 17, 2025 07:00 AM
Information Commissioner’s Office shares cyber security tips for small businesses
With cyber attacks regularly in the news, we are reminding businesses to check they have the appropriate security measures in place to...
September 11, 2025 07:00 AM
What Are The Effects Of The UK Cybersecurity Skills Shortage?
Recruitment company Robert Half reported that 45% of UK employers intend to grow their permanent IT and technology teams before the end of...
August 14, 2025 07:00 AM
Home Office Phishing Scam Target UK Visa Sponsorship System
Fake Home Office emails target the UK Visa Sponsorship System, stealing logins to issue fraudulent visas and run costly immigration scams.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
UHO CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of UK Home Office
The official website of UK Home Office is https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office.
UK Home Office’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, UK Home Office’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 792, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does UK Home Office’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, UK Home Office currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does UK Home Office have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, UK Home Office is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does UK Home Office have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, UK Home Office does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does UK Home Office comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, UK Home Office is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does UK Home Office have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, UK Home Office does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does UK Home Office comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, UK Home Office is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does UK Home Office have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,UK Home Office is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of UK Home Office
UK Home Office operates primarily in the Government Administration industry.
Number of Employees at UK Home Office
UK Home Office employs approximately 16,852 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by UK Home Office
UK Home Office presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
UK Home Office’s LinkedIn Followers
UK Home Office’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 439,416 followers.
NAICS Classification of UK Home Office
UK Home Office is classified under the NAICS code 92, which corresponds to Public Administration.
UK Home Office’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, UK Home Office does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
UK Home Office’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, UK Home Office maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/uk-home-office.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving UK Home Office
As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that UK Home Office has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
UK Home Office has an estimated 11,106 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at UK Home Office ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
How does UK Home Office detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with partial (varies by breach), incident response plan activated with legal gagging orders (afghan leak), and law enforcement notified with likely (for psni breach), law enforcement notified with unclear for other incidents, and containment measures with data removal requests (psni), containment measures with legal suppression (afghan leak), and remediation measures with review of 11 breaches by cabinet office, remediation measures with unclear if all recommendations implemented, and communication strategy with delayed/supppressed (afghan leak), communication strategy with public disclosures for psni/church of england breaches..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Series of Major UK Public Sector Data Breaches and Concerns Over Proposed Mandatory Digital ID System
Description: A review by the UK Cabinet Office revealed eleven major data breaches in recent years, exposing systemic failures in safeguarding sensitive public sector data. High-profile incidents include the 'Afghan data leak' (19,000 Afghans and 100+ British officials exposed), the PSNI breach (10,000 police officers' details published online), a Church of England abuse survivors' data leak (200 victims), and the Legal Aid Agency breach (sensitive data dating back to 2010 accessed by unauthorized parties). These breaches highlight risks associated with the UK government's proposed mandatory digital ID system, which critics argue would create a centralized 'honeypot' for hackers, enabling mass surveillance and threatening civil liberties. Public trust in the government's data security is low (63% distrust), per YouGov polling commissioned by Big Brother Watch.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Human ErrorInsecure Data HandlingImproper Access ControlsAccidental Publication
Vulnerability Exploited: Lack of Data EncryptionPoor Access ManagementInadequate RedactionFailure to Implement Security Recommendations
Threat Actor: Insider Threat (Accidental)Unauthorized Third PartiesPotential State-Sponsored Actors (for future digital ID risks)
Motivation: NegligenceOperational FailuresPotential Espionage (for Afghan/PSNI breaches)Financial Gain (for dark web sales of leaked data)
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Human error (e.g. and accidental publication)Insecure data storage.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Data Compromised: Personal identifiable information (pii), Biometric data (potential future risk with digital id), National insurance numbers, Criminal history records, Addresses, Names, Sensitive role identifiers (e.g., mi6, special forces), Abuse survivor details, Legal aid client data
Systems Affected: Defence Ministry Systems (Afghan leak)Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) DatabasesChurch of England Compensation SchemeLegal Aid Agency Systems
Operational Impact: Endangerment of Afghans who assisted British forcesRisk to lives of PSNI officers and familiesRe-traumatization of abuse survivorsLegal and reputational damage to UK governmentErosion of public trust in digital systems
Customer Complaints: ['High (public outcry, 95,000+ petition signatories)']
Brand Reputation Impact: Severe damage to UK government credibilityIncreased skepticism toward digital ID proposals
Legal Liabilities: Potential lawsuits from affected individualsViolations of GDPR/UK Data Protection ActLegal gagging orders (e.g., Afghan leak suppression)
Identity Theft Risk: ['High (for exposed PII)', 'Extreme (potential future risk with digital ID)']
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Pii (Names, Addresses), Sensitive Role Identifiers (Mi6, Special Forces), National Insurance Numbers, Criminal History, Abuse Survivor Details, Biometric Data (Potential Future Risk) and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Entity Name: UK Ministry of Defence
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Defence
Location: United Kingdom
Customers Affected: 19,000 Afghans + 100+ British officials
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Entity Name: Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI)
Entity Type: Law Enforcement
Industry: Public Safety
Location: Northern Ireland, UK
Customers Affected: 10,000 officers and staff
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Entity Name: Church of England
Entity Type: Religious Institution
Industry: Non-Profit/Religious
Location: United Kingdom
Customers Affected: 200 abuse survivors
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Entity Name: Legal Aid Agency
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Legal Services
Location: United Kingdom
Customers Affected: Unknown (records dating to 2010)
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Entity Name: UK Cabinet Office
Entity Type: Government Department
Industry: Public Administration
Location: United Kingdom
Customers Affected: Population-wide (potential future risk with digital ID)
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Incident Response Plan Activated: ['Partial (varies by breach)', 'Legal gagging orders (Afghan leak)']
Law Enforcement Notified: Likely (for PSNI breach), Unclear for other incidents,
Containment Measures: Data removal requests (PSNI)Legal suppression (Afghan leak)
Remediation Measures: Review of 11 breaches by Cabinet OfficeUnclear if all recommendations implemented
Communication Strategy: Delayed/Supppressed (Afghan leak)Public disclosures for PSNI/Church of England breaches
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Partial (varies by breach), Legal gagging orders (Afghan leak), .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Type of Data Compromised: Pii (names, addresses), Sensitive role identifiers (mi6, special forces), National insurance numbers, Criminal history, Abuse survivor details, Biometric data (potential future risk)
Number of Records Exposed: 19,000 (Afghan leak), 10,000 (PSNI), 200 (Church of England), Unknown (Legal Aid Agency, records since 2010)
Sensitivity of Data: Extremely High (life-endangering in some cases)
Data Exfiltration: Confirmed (published online for PSNI)Likely (Afghan leak)Unclear for others
Data Encryption: ['Likely Unencrypted (based on breach severity)']
File Types Exposed: DatabasesSpreadsheetsCompensation Scheme Records
Personally Identifiable Information: NamesAddressesNational Insurance NumbersRoles/Associations (e.g., interpreters, police)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Review of 11 breaches by Cabinet Office, Unclear if all recommendations implemented, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by data removal requests (psni), legal suppression (afghan leak) and .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Regulations Violated: UK GDPR, Data Protection Act 2018, Potential Human Rights Act violations (for surveillance risks),
Legal Actions: Potential lawsuits from affected parties, Parliamentary scrutiny,
Regulatory Notifications: Cabinet Office reviewLikely ICO notifications (unconfirmed)
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Potential lawsuits from affected parties, Parliamentary scrutiny, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Lessons Learned: Centralized databases create high-value targets for attackers., Public sector data handling practices are consistently inadequate., Legal suppression of breaches (e.g., gagging orders) undermines transparency., Mandatory digital ID systems could exacerbate risks to privacy and civil liberties., Public trust in government data security is critically low (63% distrust).
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Recommendations: Reject mandatory digital ID proposals to prevent mass surveillance risks., Implement all Cabinet Office review recommendations for existing systems., Enhance transparency in breach disclosures (avoid gagging orders)., Adopt decentralized, privacy-preserving identity solutions if digital ID is pursued., Strengthen legal protections for whistleblowers reporting data mishandling., Conduct independent audits of public sector data security practices.Reject mandatory digital ID proposals to prevent mass surveillance risks., Implement all Cabinet Office review recommendations for existing systems., Enhance transparency in breach disclosures (avoid gagging orders)., Adopt decentralized, privacy-preserving identity solutions if digital ID is pursued., Strengthen legal protections for whistleblowers reporting data mishandling., Conduct independent audits of public sector data security practices.Reject mandatory digital ID proposals to prevent mass surveillance risks., Implement all Cabinet Office review recommendations for existing systems., Enhance transparency in breach disclosures (avoid gagging orders)., Adopt decentralized, privacy-preserving identity solutions if digital ID is pursued., Strengthen legal protections for whistleblowers reporting data mishandling., Conduct independent audits of public sector data security practices.Reject mandatory digital ID proposals to prevent mass surveillance risks., Implement all Cabinet Office review recommendations for existing systems., Enhance transparency in breach disclosures (avoid gagging orders)., Adopt decentralized, privacy-preserving identity solutions if digital ID is pursued., Strengthen legal protections for whistleblowers reporting data mishandling., Conduct independent audits of public sector data security practices.Reject mandatory digital ID proposals to prevent mass surveillance risks., Implement all Cabinet Office review recommendations for existing systems., Enhance transparency in breach disclosures (avoid gagging orders)., Adopt decentralized, privacy-preserving identity solutions if digital ID is pursued., Strengthen legal protections for whistleblowers reporting data mishandling., Conduct independent audits of public sector data security practices.Reject mandatory digital ID proposals to prevent mass surveillance risks., Implement all Cabinet Office review recommendations for existing systems., Enhance transparency in breach disclosures (avoid gagging orders)., Adopt decentralized, privacy-preserving identity solutions if digital ID is pursued., Strengthen legal protections for whistleblowers reporting data mishandling., Conduct independent audits of public sector data security practices.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Centralized databases create high-value targets for attackers.,Public sector data handling practices are consistently inadequate.,Legal suppression of breaches (e.g., gagging orders) undermines transparency.,Mandatory digital ID systems could exacerbate risks to privacy and civil liberties.,Public trust in government data security is critically low (63% distrust).
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Source: Big Brother Watch Report: 'Checkpoint Britain: the dangers of digital ID and why privacy must be protected'
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Source: YouGov Polling (commissioned by Big Brother Watch)
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Source: UK Cabinet Office Review of 11 Major Data Breaches
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Source: Big Brother Watch Petition Against Digital ID
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Big Brother Watch Report: 'Checkpoint Britain: the dangers of digital ID and why privacy must be protected', and Source: YouGov Polling (commissioned by Big Brother Watch), and Source: UK Cabinet Office Review of 11 Major Data Breaches, and Source: Big Brother Watch Petition Against Digital ID.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Investigation Status: ['Ongoing (for some breaches)', 'Cabinet Office review completed but recommendations not fully implemented']
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Delayed/Supppressed (Afghan Leak) and Public Disclosures For Psni/Church Of England Breaches.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Stakeholder Advisories: Big Brother Watch Warns Of Orwellian Surveillance Risks With Digital Id., Public Opposition Via 95,000+ Petition Signatories., Mps Criticize Government For Failing To Act On Breach Review Recommendations..
Customer Advisories: Affected individuals in Afghan/PSNI breaches likely received risk notifications.Church of England abuse survivors offered support (unclear if adequate).General public advised to oppose mandatory digital ID proposals.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Big Brother Watch Warns Of Orwellian Surveillance Risks With Digital Id., Public Opposition Via 95,000+ Petition Signatories., Mps Criticize Government For Failing To Act On Breach Review Recommendations., Affected Individuals In Afghan/Psni Breaches Likely Received Risk Notifications., Church Of England Abuse Survivors Offered Support (Unclear If Adequate)., General Public Advised To Oppose Mandatory Digital Id Proposals. and .
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Entry Point: Human Error (E.G., Accidental Publication), Insecure Data Storage,
High Value Targets: Afghan Interpreters, Psni Officers, Abuse Survivors, Potential Future: Entire Uk Adult Population (Digital Id),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Afghan Interpreters, Psni Officers, Abuse Survivors, Potential Future: Entire Uk Adult Population (Digital Id),
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UK-0694206092025
Root Causes: Chronic Underinvestment In Public Sector Cybersecurity., Culture Of Secrecy (E.G., Gagging Orders) Prioritized Over Transparency., Lack Of Accountability For Repeated Breaches., Failure To Implement Existing Security Recommendations., Over-Reliance On Centralized Data Storage Without Adequate Protections.,
Corrective Actions: Cabinet Office Review (Incomplete Implementation)., Public Campaigning Against Digital Id (E.G., Big Brother Watch)., Parliamentary Scrutiny Of Breach Responses., Proposed Decentralized Alternatives To Digital Id (By Privacy Advocates).,
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Cabinet Office Review (Incomplete Implementation)., Public Campaigning Against Digital Id (E.G., Big Brother Watch)., Parliamentary Scrutiny Of Breach Responses., Proposed Decentralized Alternatives To Digital Id (By Privacy Advocates)., .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Insider Threat (Accidental)Unauthorized Third PartiesPotential State-Sponsored Actors (for future digital ID risks).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal Identifiable Information (PII), Biometric Data (potential future risk with digital ID), National Insurance Numbers, Criminal History Records, Addresses, Names, Sensitive Role Identifiers (e.g., MI6, Special Forces), Abuse Survivor Details, Legal Aid Client Data and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Defence Ministry Systems (Afghan leak)Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) DatabasesChurch of England Compensation SchemeLegal Aid Agency Systems.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Data removal requests (PSNI)Legal suppression (Afghan leak).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Names, Biometric Data (potential future risk with digital ID), National Insurance Numbers, Sensitive Role Identifiers (e.g., MI6, Special Forces), Legal Aid Client Data, Personal Identifiable Information (PII), Abuse Survivor Details, Addresses and Criminal History Records.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 29.4K.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Potential lawsuits from affected parties, Parliamentary scrutiny, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Public trust in government data security is critically low (63% distrust).
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Conduct independent audits of public sector data security practices., Strengthen legal protections for whistleblowers reporting data mishandling., Reject mandatory digital ID proposals to prevent mass surveillance risks., Adopt decentralized, privacy-preserving identity solutions if digital ID is pursued., Enhance transparency in breach disclosures (avoid gagging orders). and Implement all Cabinet Office review recommendations for existing systems..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are YouGov Polling (commissioned by Big Brother Watch), Big Brother Watch Report: 'Checkpoint Britain: the dangers of digital ID and why privacy must be protected', UK Cabinet Office Review of 11 Major Data Breaches and Big Brother Watch Petition Against Digital ID.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is ['Ongoing (for some breaches)', 'Cabinet Office review completed but recommendations not fully implemented'].
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Big Brother Watch warns of Orwellian surveillance risks with digital ID., Public opposition via 95,000+ petition signatories., MPs criticize government for failing to act on breach review recommendations., .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Affected individuals in Afghan/PSNI breaches likely received risk notifications.Church of England abuse survivors offered support (unclear if adequate).General public advised to oppose mandatory digital ID proposals.
Initial Access Broker
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=uk-home-office' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
