Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » UFCW Local 342 » UFC1773160904

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (UFC1773160904)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-53
Company Score Before Incident773 / 1000
Company Score After Incident720 / 1000
Company LinkView UFCW Local 342 Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERUFC1773160904
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive information
INCIDENT DATE11/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of UFCW Local 342's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts UFCW Local 342 Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the UFCW Local 342 breach identified under incident ID UFC1773160904.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of UFCW Local 342's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ufcw-local-342, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Public Policy Offices and the number of employees: 49 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 773 and after the incident was 720 with a difference of -53 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on UFCW Local 342 and their customers.

On 09 March 2026, UFCW Local 342 disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "UFCW Local 342 Data Breach".

UFCW Local 342, a labor union representing workers in New York and New Jersey, identified a data breach impacting 56,615 individuals nationwide, including 30 residents of Maine.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive information, with nearly 56615 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Dedicated toll-free line (833-518-0169) and notification letters.

The case underscores how Ongoing, and recommending next steps like Affected individuals are advised to place fraud alerts on credit files, consider credit freezes, review credit reports for unauthorized activity, and monitor health insurance statements for signs of medical identity theft, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Complimentary credit monitoring services offered (enrollment within 90 days required). Additional resources on identity theft prevention provided.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating details surrounding the breach remain limited...could range from...unauthorized access and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating scale of the breach...suggests a significant compromise. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access or internal error...sensitive information compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting 56,615 individuals...sensitive information and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating labor union representing workers...high sensitivity of data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating 56,615 individuals affected...high identity theft risk and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating scale of breach suggests organized exfiltration. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating details surrounding the breach remain limited and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk...medical identity theft concerns. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (70%)
Data from Information Repositories (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (40%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References