Comparison Overview
UCalgary Faculty of Arts

UCalgary Faculty of Arts
2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, T2N 1N4, CA
Last Update: 19/02/2026
Welcome to UCalgary’s most diverse faculty! Our motto is to Engage, Inspire and Discover -- through critical and creative research, teaching excellence and expertise and embracing equity, diversity and inclusion. We nurture talent, imagination and ambition to understan...

Columbia University
West 116 Street and Broadway, New York, NY, US, 10027
Last Update: 08/08/2026
For more than 250 years, Columbia has been a leader in higher education in the nation and around the world. At the core of our wide range of academic inquiry is the commitment to attract and engage the best minds in pursuit of greater human understanding, pioneering new...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

UCalgary Faculty of Arts







Columbia University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UCalgary Faculty of Arts in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Columbia University has 197.03% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - UCalgary Faculty of Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UCalgary Faculty of Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Columbia University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Columbia University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

UCalgary Faculty of Arts

Columbia University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.