Columbia University
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
columbia-university
Website:
Employees number:
23,329
Number of followers:
740,462
NAICS:
6113
Industry Type:
Homepage:
columbia.edu
IP Addresses:
614
Company ID:
COL_3351048
Scan Status:
Completed
Columbia University Company CyberSecurity Posture
columbia.edu
For more than 250 years, Columbia has been a leader in higher education in the nation and around the world. At the core of our wide range of academic inquiry is the commitment to attract and engage the best minds in pursuit of greater human understanding, pioneering new discoveries and service to society.
Columbia University A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Columbia University Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
Columbia University
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Columbia University Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Columbia University
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Columbia University Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
Dartmouth College, Harvard University, Princeton University, Columbia University and Clemson University: Why Cyberattacks in Higher Ed Keep Proliferating
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Higher Education Under Siege: A Wave of Cyberattacks Exposes Systemic Vulnerabilities In the first half of 2025, a surge of cyberattacks has targeted major U.S. universities, exposing critical weaknesses in higher education’s cybersecurity defenses. The University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, and Princeton University all reported breaches within the past two months, following earlier incidents at Columbia University, Dartmouth College, and New York University. Each institution confirmed the attacks stemmed from social engineering, with Harvard and Princeton specifically citing phone-based phishing as the entry point. Officials at the affected schools stated they acted swiftly to contain the breaches and are reinforcing security measures. However, experts warn that universities face an uphill battle. Mike Corn, a former chief information security officer in higher education and current consultant at Vantage Technology, noted that colleges operate like "small cities," with decentralized networks, personal devices, and diverse user behaviors creating countless vulnerabilities. Even robust investments in cybersecurity, he argued, cannot guarantee immunity from attacks especially as AI-driven threats grow more sophisticated. The challenges extend beyond technology. Brian Nichols, CIO at the University of Kentucky, highlighted that while phishing simulations and training have improved awareness, they are not foolproof. Anita Nikolich, director of research and technology innovation at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, warned that punitive security measures can backfire, alienating faculty who may resist protocols perceived as restrictive. A core tension lies in academic freedom versus centralized IT control: many universities allow individual departments such as medical or business schools to maintain separate IT teams, increasing risk. Nikolich, who previously led IT infrastructure at the University of Chicago, described this fragmentation as a "huge risk factor," as decentralized systems complicate consistent security enforcement. Faculty resistance further complicates the issue. Janice Lanham, a nursing lecturer at Clemson University, nearly fell victim to a phishing scam but caught the deception in time. Yet, as Brian Voss, Clemson’s CIO, observed, some professors view security protocols as obstacles to research and teaching. Voss described a "culture of subservience" in higher-ed IT, where departments prioritize faculty demands over security, often retaining excessive data including sensitive information like Social Security numbers despite the risks. His efforts to reduce data storage have met resistance, with one university even retaining personal data for voter registration purposes, creating what he called "piles of gold for bad guys." The conflict between research needs and security is particularly acute. Nikolich, who also conducts quantum computing research, faced initial pushback when requesting network data for her work. After demonstrating the data’s non-sensitive nature and potential security benefits, she gained access but noted that other universities default to blanket denials. When researchers are blocked, she warned, they often bypass official channels, increasing exposure. The solution, Nikolich suggested, lies in collaboration: IT, security teams, and faculty must treat cybersecurity as a shared priority, balancing innovation with protection. Until then, universities remain prime targets caught between the demands of open academic environments and the escalating sophistication of cyber threats.
Columbia University Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Columbia University
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)
Columbia University has 50.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Columbia University has 27.54% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types Columbia University vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Columbia University reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — Columbia University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Columbia University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Columbia University Company Subsidiaries
For more than 250 years, Columbia has been a leader in higher education in the nation and around the world. At the core of our wide range of academic inquiry is the commitment to attract and engage the best minds in pursuit of greater human understanding, pioneering new discoveries and service to society.
Loading...
Columbia University Similar Companies
University of Pittsburgh
The University of Pittsburgh is a top-ranked, public institution in Pennsylvania and a member of the Association of American Universities of leading research universities. With our discoveries, we are recognized as one of the most innovative universities in the world. We invent the paths of the futu
Rutgers University
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, stands among America’s highest-ranked, most diverse public research universities. The oldest, largest, and top-ranked public university in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan area, you’ll find us at our main locations in three New Jersey cities, and our
The University of Missouri System has provided teaching, research and service to Missouri and the nation since 1839. The university was the first publicly supported institution of higher education established in the Louisiana Purchase territory. Its philosophy of education was shaped in accordance
Arizona State University
ASU has developed a new model for the American research university, creating an institution committed to excellence, access and impact — the New American University. Nationally and internationally acclaimed, ASU ranks among the very best in nearly every critical measurement of student success, out
Texas A&M University
Texas A&M University has a proud history that stretches back to 1876 when The Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas became the first public institution of higher learning in the state of Texas. Nestled in the heart of the Houston-Dallas-Austin triangle, Texas A&M University at College Station
UC Irvine
Since 1965, the University of California, Irvine has combined the strengths of a major research university with the bounty of an incomparable Southern California location. As a U.S. News & World Report top 10 public university, UCI’s unyielding commitment to rigorous academics, cutting-edge research
The University of Queensland
For more than a century, The University of Queensland (UQ) has maintained a global reputation for delivering knowledge leadership for a better world. The most prestigious and widely recognised rankings of world universities consistently place UQ among the world's top universities. UQ has also wo
Temple University
As the largest university in one of the nation’s most iconic cities, Temple educates diverse future leaders from across Philadelphia, the country and the world who share a common drive to learn, prepare for their careers and make a real impact. Founded as a night school by Russell Conwell in 1884, T
The Johns Hopkins University
We are America’s first research university, founded in 1876 on the principle that by pursuing big ideas and sharing what we learn, we can make the world a better place. For more than 140 years, our faculty and students have worked side by side in pursuit of discoveries that improve lives. Johns Hop
.png)
Columbia University CyberSecurity News
January 12, 2026 11:08 PM
Columbia University warns community about personal information stolen months after ‘politically motivated’ hack
The hack came during the summer of 2025, when Columbia was negotiating with the Trump administration to restore hundreds of millions of...
January 12, 2026 01:49 AM
SAYA University Announces Japan-Native Cybersecurity Awareness Training avalibilty on NTT DOCOMO gacco
Cybersecurity awareness must reach employees and everyday people alike. Through NTT DOCOMO gacco, SAYA delivers Japanese-native training at...
December 19, 2025 08:00 AM
Lawsuits filed against University after cybersecurity incidents
Multiple lawsuits have been filed against Princeton in the wake of a widespread cybersecurity breach.
November 06, 2025 08:00 AM
Why massive data breaches are still surging in higher ed
As cybercriminals grow more sophisticated, universities are facing a new wave of phishing attacks that are harder to detect and more...
October 31, 2025 07:00 AM
University of Pennsylvania investigating offensive email sent through graduate school system
The University of Pennsylvania is investigating an email that was sent out to thousands of current and former students on Friday afternoon...
October 29, 2025 07:15 PM
The following is the announcement made by the East Hampton, New York, library:
Joseph Steinberg, author of "CyberSecurity for Dummies,” and a Columbia University lecturer on the subject, will be speaking for the East Hampton New York...
October 17, 2025 07:00 AM
Conference on Cyber Regulation
Panel I: Update on Cyber Regulation and the Grid This panel will explore the latest in cybersecurity regulation for the electrical grid,...
October 14, 2025 03:23 PM
Joseph Steinberg To Moderate AI and Cybersecurity Panel for Columbia Business School Alumni
Next month, cybersecurity expert Joseph Steinberg will moderate panel on Artificial Intelligence for the Columbia Business School Alumni Association.
September 19, 2025 07:00 AM
Columbia University Health Care to Pay $600,000 to Settle Data Breach Lawsuit
Columbia University Health Care (CUHC) has agreed to pay $600000 to settle a class action lawsuit over a cybersecurity incident that...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Columbia University CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Columbia University
The official website of Columbia University is http://columbia.edu.
Columbia University’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 749, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does Columbia University’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has Columbia University been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
Does Columbia University have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Columbia University have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Columbia University comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Columbia University have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Columbia University comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Columbia University have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Columbia University is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Columbia University
Columbia University operates primarily in the Higher Education industry.
Number of Employees at Columbia University
Columbia University employs approximately 23,329 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Columbia University
Columbia University presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Columbia University’s LinkedIn Followers
Columbia University’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 740,462 followers.
NAICS Classification of Columbia University
Columbia University is classified under the NAICS code 6113, which corresponds to Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools.
Columbia University’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Columbia University does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Columbia University’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Columbia University maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/columbia-university.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Columbia University
As of January 23, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Columbia University has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Columbia University has an estimated 15,170 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Columbia University ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
How does Columbia University detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with yes, and containment measures with removed hackers' access to internal systems, and remediation measures with stepped up security protocols, and communication strategy with public statements to stakeholders..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Multiple University Data Breaches Due to Social Engineering Attacks
Description: In the past two months, the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, and Princeton University have fallen victim to data breaches attributed to social engineering attacks, specifically phone-based phishing. Earlier in 2025, Columbia University, Dartmouth College, and New York University also experienced similar incidents. These breaches highlight vulnerabilities in higher education cybersecurity infrastructure.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering (Phone-based Phishing)
Vulnerability Exploited: Human error, lack of centralized IT control, decentralized IT departments
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Phone-based phishing (social engineering).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Data Compromised: Personal data of students, faculty, and staff
Systems Affected: Internal university systems
Operational Impact: Disruption of university operations, increased security protocols
Brand Reputation Impact: Reputational damage to affected universities
Identity Theft Risk: High (potential exposure of personally identifiable information)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal data and potentially including personally identifiable information.
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: University of Pennsylvania
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: Harvard University
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: Princeton University
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: Columbia University
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: Dartmouth College
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: New York University
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes
Containment Measures: Removed hackers' access to internal systems
Remediation Measures: Stepped up security protocols
Communication Strategy: Public statements to stakeholders
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes.
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Type of Data Compromised: Personal data, potentially including personally identifiable information
Sensitivity of Data: High (personal and potentially sensitive information)
Personally Identifiable Information: Likely (e.g., Social Security numbers, payroll data)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Stepped up security protocols.
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by removed hackers' access to internal systems.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Lessons Learned: Universities are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks due to decentralized IT structures, lack of centralized control, and human error. Cybersecurity training and awareness are critical but not sufficient alone. There is a need for better collaboration between IT departments and faculty to balance security with academic freedom.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Recommendations: Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Universities are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks due to decentralized IT structures, lack of centralized control, and human error. Cybersecurity training and awareness are critical but not sufficient alone. There is a need for better collaboration between IT departments and faculty to balance security with academic freedom.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Source: Chronicle of Higher Education
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Chronicle of Higher Education.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Investigation Status: Ongoing
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public statements to stakeholders.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Stakeholder Advisories: Universities have issued public statements to stakeholders about the breaches and steps taken to mitigate risks.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: was Universities have issued public statements to stakeholders about the breaches and steps taken to mitigate risks..
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entry Point: Phone-based phishing (social engineering)
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Root Causes: Human Error (Falling For Phishing Attacks), Decentralized It Departments Creating Inconsistent Security Protocols, Lack Of Centralized Control Over Technology Use, Excessive Data Retention (E.G., Storing Social Security Numbers Unnecessarily), Faculty Resistance To It Policies Due To Perceived Restrictions On Academic Freedom,
Corrective Actions: Removing Hackers' Access To Systems, Stepping Up Security Protocols, Enhancing Cybersecurity Training For Faculty And Staff,
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Removing Hackers' Access To Systems, Stepping Up Security Protocols, Enhancing Cybersecurity Training For Faculty And Staff, .
Additional Questions
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal data of students, faculty and and staff.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Removed hackers' access to internal systems.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Personal data of students, faculty and and staff.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Universities are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks due to decentralized IT structures, lack of centralized control, and human error. Cybersecurity training and awareness are critical but not sufficient alone. There is a need for better collaboration between IT departments and faculty to balance security with academic freedom.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively., Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g. and avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is Chronicle of Higher Education.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Universities have issued public statements to stakeholders about the breaches and steps taken to mitigate risks., .
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Phone-based phishing (social engineering).
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description
Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description
Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=columbia-university' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
