Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Ubisoft » NINCRYUBICAP1780793478

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (NINCRYUBICAP1780793478)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-21
Company Score Before Incident736 / 1000
Company Score After Incident715 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERNINCRYUBICAP1780793478
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDsource code, internal data
INCIDENT DATE06/11/2020
STATUSongoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Ubisoft's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Ubisoft Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Ubisoft breach identified under incident ID NINCRYUBICAP1780793478.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Ubisoft's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ubisoft, the number of followers: 1486883, the industry type: Computer Games and the number of employees: 21990 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 736 and after the incident was 715 with a difference of -21 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Ubisoft and their customers.

Capcom recently reported "Cyberattacks Target Major Video Game Studios, Exposing Source Code and Internal Data", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

In a wave of recent cyber incidents, leading video game companies including Capcom, Ubisoft, and Crytek have fallen victim to ransomware attacks and data breaches, raising concerns over the security of intellectual property in the gaming industry.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting email servers, file servers and internal networks, and exposing source code and internal data.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating disrupted internal networks, including email and file servers and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ragnar Locker ransomware group targeted internal networks. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ragnar Locker ransomware group disrupted internal networks. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating internal networks, including email and file servers disrupted. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ragnar Locker ransomware group targeted internal networks. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ragnar Locker ransomware group attributed to the breach and Indicator Removal: File Deletion (T1070.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of customer data being accessed (Capcom). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating internal networks disrupted, potential unauthorized access. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating source code and internal data compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating source code for Watch Dogs such as Legion stolen (Ubisoft) and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating internal data compromised via internal networks. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating source code and internal data compromised and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breaches raising concerns over IP security. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ragnar Locker ransomware group attributed to the breach and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating disrupted internal networks, potential data loss. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
External Remote Services (60%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (60%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (50%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Indicator Removal: File Deletion (60%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (50%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (70%)
Data Destruction (50%)

Sources & References