Comparison Overview

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

VS

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

Washington, 20536, US
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 550 and 599

Protects America through criminal investigations and by enforcing immigration law to preserve national security and public safety. Privacy: http://go.dhs.gov/UC8 https://go.dhs.gov/lapse-2025

NAICS: 92212
NAICS Definition: Police Protection
Employees: 1,791
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
5

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

J. Edgar Hoover Building, Washington, 20535-0001, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 600 and 649

This is the official Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) LinkedIn account and is used to build awareness of workplace culture, engagement opportunities, and the FBI mission. The FBI does not collect comments or messages through this account. The FBI is the premier law enforcement agency in the world. We are an intelligence-driven, outcome-focused national security organization. Steeped in a history of innovation and determination, the Bureau is a collective of individuals united under one unwavering mission: to protect the American people and uphold the U.S. Constitution. The FBI mission guides our efforts and focuses our resources on critical threats, while our core values—respect, integrity, accountability, leadership, compassion, fairness, and rigorous obedience to the Constitution—serve as the foundation of everything we do. The FBI has more than 500 purpose-driven careers—such as special agent, forensic accountant, victim specialist, and IT specialist—to safeguard the nation against cyberattacks, financial fraud, organized crime, and more. We leverage our varied backgrounds, from art history to engineering, to investigate illegal activity. The FBI collaborates worldwide with law enforcement partners and intelligence agencies, providing resources including biometric identification, laboratory examinations, comprehensive training, and more. And while you are investing in us, the FBI is investing in you: Bureau benefits include unparalleled leadership development, advancement and growth opportunities, and an impactful career that enables our workforce to evolve with the mission. Set yourself apart by joining the FBI. Apply today. Note: Submit tips at tips.fbi.gov. Public info may be used for authorized purposes only: justice.gov/doj/privacy-policy.

NAICS: 92212
NAICS Definition: Police Protection
Employees: 10,118
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/u-s-immigration-and-customs-enforcement-ice.jpeg
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fbi.jpeg
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has 11.11% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has 55.56% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/u-s-immigration-and-customs-enforcement-ice.jpeg
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Whistleblower Leak
Motivation: Accountability for law enforcement actions, reform of ICE and CBP
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS)
Motivation: Suppression of leaked data
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Brute-force attacks, Password spraying, MFA fatigue (push bombing)
Motivation: Retaliation for U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, Financial gain (ransomware payments), Political/ideological (anti-Semitic or anti-Israel sentiment)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fbi.jpeg
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Brute-force attacks, Password spraying, MFA fatigue (push bombing)
Motivation: Retaliation for U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, Financial gain (ransomware payments), Political/ideological (anti-Semitic or anti-Israel sentiment)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing (Password Reuse Exploitation), Infostealer Malware (Browser/Email Client Credential Theft), Targeted Phishing/Social Engineering, Dark Web/Encrypted Messaging Platforms (Telegram, Signal), Mainstream Platforms (TikTok, X)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Selling Access for $40–$X per Account), Fraud (Impersonation, Forged EDRs, Malware Distribution), Exploitation of Institutional Trust, Access to Premium OSINT Tools, Data Theft (IP Addresses, Emails, Phone Numbers)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Radical Ideology Proliferation
Motivation: Radical Ideology, Political Motives
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company.

In the current year, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company has reported more cyber incidents than Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Both Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company employs more people globally than U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company, reflecting its scale as a Law Enforcement.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N